Local London Logo
Where I Live
Barnet & Potters Bar
Bexley
Bishop's Stortford
Borehamwood
Bromley
Chigwell
Chingford
Croydon
Dartford & Gravesend
Ealing
Edgware
Elmbridge
Enfield
Epping Forest
Epsom
Harlow
Harrow
Hendon & Finchley
Hillingdon & Uxbridge
Hounslow & Chiswick
Kingston
Lewisham & Greenwich
Leyton
Loughton & Buckhurst Hill
Muswell Hill & Crouch End
Ongar
Redbridge
Richmond & Twickenham
South Bucks
Staines
St. Albans
Stratford
Streatham
Surrey
Sutton
Tottenham
Waltham Abbey
Waltham Forest
Wandsworth
Wanstead & Woodford
Watford
Wimbledon, Morden & Mitcham
Wood Green & Hornsey
Local Headlines
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Waltham Forest
EDITOR'S CHOICE
TOP STORIES
BEXLEY: Murder inquiry into mystery body in recycling
Boris boosts police numbers on buses
ENFIELD: Two more arrests in Ike Nmezu murder case
FEATURES
Health shake-up under spotlight
Family firm is well-bread
MAYOR NEWS
Boris boosts police numbers on buses
BIZARRE LONDON
TRAVEL
A giant 'no' to Heathrow
COMPETITIONS
Enter a world build for speed and win a Warner Bros. Pictures Speed Racer goody bag
VOTE
Do you think all police officers should be armed with stun guns?
Yes
No
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
CHINGFORD: Thousands sign parking petition
Brothers Greg, Mike and Alan Jukes with the petition (EL7705-3)
Brothers Greg, Mike and Alan Jukes with the petition (EL7705-3)

THOUSANDS of angry shoppers and traders have objected to increased parking charges made by the local authority.

Chingford traders believe that since the cost of parking was doubled at the beginning of April from 50p for an hour, to 50p for 30 minutes, shoppers have been spending less time perusing the shops in Station Road to save on parking charges.

A petition of more than 3,000 names was presented at the full council meeting calling for Waltham Forest Council to take note of their objections and requesting justification for a price hike well above inflation.

Mike Jukes, sales manager at JJ Lighting in Station Road, said at the meeting: "I find it difficult to believe that the cost of enforcement has doubled. How can the council justify these charges?

"People are buying 30-minute vouchers which makes them rush. If it becomes too expensive they will simply shop elsewhere. Shoppers will disappear, the shops may close and make the area less desirable and more shops may close, which will result in a loss of jobs.

"Retail already has difficulties as we now we have more supermarkets, people buying goods on the internet and a credit crunch and economic crisis predicted."

Mr Jukes' speech was met with applause, but he said he will have to wait and see whether the council listens.

He said after the meeting: "It seemed to generate a rousing applause and I hope we have the support of the council.

"We will give the council the opportunity to respond and if it is unsatisfactory, we will speak to local councillors and get advice on the next step to get our views heard."

The new parking charges introduced in April are 50p to park for 30 minutes, £1 for one hour and £5 for a daily voucher.

11:41am Friday 9th May 2008

Print   Email this   Comment
Posted by: raymondo, high street on 4:04pm Fri 9 May 08
Just more greed from the council.
Posted by: Frederick, Waltham Forest on 6:02pm Fri 9 May 08
Judging by the kind of flash car you see parked in Station Rad, these drivers can easily afford to pay this trivial charge. The money is ploughed back into the budget for road improvmenets. There is also plenty of free parking in the back streets for those prepared to make the effort of walking a couple of hundred yards.
Posted by: joe schmoo, elsewhere on 8:44pm Fri 9 May 08
Frederick wrote:
Judging by the kind of flash car you see parked in Station Rad, these drivers can easily afford to pay this trivial charge. The money is ploughed back into the budget for road improvmenets. There is also plenty of free parking in the back streets for those prepared to make the effort of walking a couple of hundred yards.
typical idiotic jealous quote

so what if there are nice cars parked.

plenty of shi*te cars parked with no tax just up the road


are they allowed
Posted by: Mr. T. C. Hull, Walthamstow on 12:49am Sat 10 May 08
raymondo wrote:
Just more greed from the council.
Another case of legalised theft by 'Loakes and his Jokes'
Posted by: Dave, Chingford on 12:06pm Mon 12 May 08
Frederick wrote:
Judging by the kind of flash car you see parked in Station Rad, these drivers can easily afford to pay this trivial charge. The money is ploughed back into the budget for road improvmenets. There is also plenty of free parking in the back streets for those prepared to make the effort of walking a couple of hundred yards.
ploughed back into the budget for road improvmenets

Road improvements???
Yeah ok. Whats your next joke?
Posted by: Dave, Chingford on 3:22pm Mon 12 May 08
Dave wrote:
Frederick wrote:
Judging by the kind of flash car you see parked in Station Rad, these drivers can easily afford to pay this trivial charge. The money is ploughed back into the budget for road improvmenets. There is also plenty of free parking in the back streets for those prepared to make the effort of walking a couple of hundred yards.
ploughed back into the budget for road improvmenets

Road improvements???
Yeah ok. Whats your next joke?
Well there is all the useless 'humps' that have appeared at several of the junctions off of Hoe Street between the High St and The Bell.
Posted by: Mr Khalid, walthamstow on 4:22pm Mon 12 May 08
is confiuseded for the parsons this scrageded tiketss problam for me if scrggeded wrong the boxs is all ways wrong the box and is traf woden giveded the parson many tiks
Posted by: a person, Chingford on 10:30am Thu 15 May 08
Frederick wrote:
Judging by the kind of flash car you see parked in Station Rad, these drivers can easily afford to pay this trivial charge. The money is ploughed back into the budget for road improvmenets. There is also plenty of free parking in the back streets for those prepared to make the effort of walking a couple of hundred yards.
The money is NOT plouged back into road improvements. It can only be spent of further parking enforcement.

If people choose to park in the back roads, no doubt the council will apply a CPZ, paid for with all this extra revenue. Extremely narrow minded view.
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login
Archive
Local Search
Powered by Powered by Fish4
Use our news
Feed Local London headlines live to your site with RSS - free!
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network