Carshalton PC Simon Harwood cleared of manslaughter

PC Simon Harwood, from Carshalton PC Simon Harwood, from Carshalton

A police officer has been cleared of the manslaughter of a newspaper seller at a central London protest.

PC Simon Harwood, from Carshalton, hit Ian Tomlinson with a baton and pushed him to the ground ashe prepared to walk away from a line of officers in the City of London in April 2009.

Within minutes the 47-year-old - who had been trying to walk home but found his usual route blocked due to G20 protests that day - collapsed and later died .

Prosecutors had claimed the assault upon Ian Tomlinson was an unnecessary and unreasonable use of force by the defendant that led to his death.

PC Harwood maintained he had used reasonable force and denied manslaughter throughout his trial at Southwark Crown Court.

Harwood told the court that while in retrospect he "got it wrong" in seeing Mr Tomlinson as a potentially threatening obstruction as police cleared a pedestrian passageway, his actions were justifiable within the context of the widespread disorder of that day.

Today a jury returned a verdict of not guilty.

The charges against PC Harwood, a member of the Metropolitan Police's territorial support group, followed an inquest last year which found Mr Tomlinson had been unlawfully killed.

Comments(21)

I hope not says...
3:19pm Thu 19 Jul 12

Mr. Tomlinson was street homeless and an alcoholic who died from internal injuries to his liver. PC Harwood pushed him over and hit him on the leg. As for Mr. Tomlinson's family, well where were they when he was homeless and in need of support ??? The Police do a very difficult job and it was a highly volatile situation. I am very sorry that he lost his life, but perhaps if others had given a monkeys about him before, he wouldn't have been in the wrong place at the wrong time in the first place. There are no winners here.

Crease2000 says...
3:58pm Thu 19 Jul 12

That's exactly what I was wondering when I heard this on the radio today. His family were apparently visibly upset at the verdict, so why did they leave him on the streets when he needed help??

puzzled says...
4:29pm Thu 19 Jul 12

It is quite usual for someone in rehab to live in a hostel away from family pressures

Crease2000 says...
5:18pm Thu 19 Jul 12

There's been no mention of being in rehab or living in a hostel. The reports state that he was sleeping rough for quite some time. Anyway, apparently the family are seeking compensation and now it makes a bit more sense to me.

edstar says...
5:26pm Thu 19 Jul 12

So are we agreed. The police can beat up (and kill) someone who is doing not as long as they are homeless?

I didn't know the daily mail forums linked to the local guardian

justbeinghonest says...
5:46pm Thu 19 Jul 12

would ian tomlinson have died that day if he had not been struck by the police officer? no.
manslaughter in my eyes.

kerry wright says...
6:05pm Thu 19 Jul 12

OFCOURSE HE GOT OFF HE IS A COPPER WHAT DID ANYONE EXPECT.
IF IT HAD BEEN A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC THEY WOULD BE DOING TIME NOW

I hope not says...
6:57pm Thu 19 Jul 12

Actually if you look at the Daily Mail web site, they are on the family's side, not the Police. They cannot stand the Police in case you haven't noticed. Funny how the family are suddenly seeking compensation, what a shame they couldn't have looked after their own when HE needed it. As for the Police "beating" someone up, since when did a push and a smack on the leg mean beaten up ? This has been sensationalized beyond belief. This was a near on riot, the Police did their job and a sick man, with existing health problems who was drunk and beligerent got in the middle of it all and paid the ultimate price. Perhaps the family would like to sue the protesters too for causing it all in the first place ? No ? Didn't think so.

edstar says...
7:37pm Thu 19 Jul 12

I hope not wrote:
Actually if you look at the Daily Mail web site, they are on the family's side, not the Police. They cannot stand the Police in case you haven't noticed. Funny how the family are suddenly seeking compensation, what a shame they couldn't have looked after their own when HE needed it. As for the Police "beating" someone up, since when did a push and a smack on the leg mean beaten up ? This has been sensationalized beyond belief. This was a near on riot, the Police did their job and a sick man, with existing health problems who was drunk and beligerent got in the middle of it all and paid the ultimate price. Perhaps the family would like to sue the protesters too for causing it all in the first place ? No ? Didn't think so.
why would i look at the daily mails website any more then I would look at the BNPs website but with added cancer?

ok then a few questions for you.

1. would Mr Tomlinson be alive if he hadnt met "PC" Harwood ?

2 What did he do that was so "Belligerent" that need Mr Tomlinson to be struck by "PC" Harwood with such force that it caused his death?

3. Do you know that in 2000, five years after he joined the Met, PC Harwood was involved in what was described at Mr Tomlinson's inquest as a "road rage" incident but his employment record was kept from the jury. He was off-duty and the other driver complained of unlawful arrest and abuse of authority. "PC" Harwood denied the accusation but retired on medical grounds in 2001 before a disciplinary hearing took place. Coward!

4. Did you know that "PC" Harwood had over 10 complaints of recorded against him 12 years.

Nice!

Mr Tomlinson may have had his problems but he didnt do anything that deserved to be beaten by a police office causing injuries which caused his death. Do you disagree?

puzzled says...
10:45pm Thu 19 Jul 12

When he was caught up in the demonstrations of 1 April 2009, it is thought he was making his way back to a hostel that had been his home since the previous October.

Shrimpers } says...
7:04am Fri 20 Jul 12

Harwood is a **** disgrace to the police force,his family and Carshalton

surrey-L says...
10:01am Fri 20 Jul 12

i find it hilarious how many details the journolists chose to not include!

Readign this story makes me feel sorry for Mr Tomlinson. But when youve seen footage etc then its a complete different story.!!!

Where were the family when he needed them at his lowest? then they claim compensation- decribes the kind of people these are!

BB1971 says...
11:32am Fri 20 Jul 12

Surprise Surprise

John Terry did something illegal on camera & got away with it, as did Ian Tomlinson's killer. He must have pushed him in a sarcastic way.

BB1971 says...
11:32am Fri 20 Jul 12

Surprise Surprise

John Terry did something illegal on camera & got away with it, as did Ian Tomlinson's killer. He must have pushed him in a sarcastic way.

BB1971 says...
11:32am Fri 20 Jul 12

Surprise Surprise

John Terry did something illegal on camera & got away with it, as did Ian Tomlinson's killer. He must have pushed him in a sarcastic way.

BB1971 says...
11:33am Fri 20 Jul 12

Surprise Surprise

John Terry did something illegal on camera & got away with it, as did Ian Tomlinson's killer. He must have pushed him in a sarcastic way.

BB1971 says...
11:34am Fri 20 Jul 12

Surprise Surprise

John Terry did something illegal on camera & got away with it, as did Ian Tomlinson's killer. He must have pushed him in a sarcastic way.

I hope not says...
12:47pm Fri 20 Jul 12

Edstar, because YOU bought the Daily Mail into this discussion, not me.

1. would Mr Tomlinson be alive if he hadnt met "PC" Harwood ?

Perhaps, or perhaps not, he had pre-existing health conditions, including those bought on by his chronic alcohol misuse, so who could say ?

2 What did he do that was so "Belligerent" that need Mr Tomlinson to be struck by "PC" Harwood with such force that it caused his death?

Sorry, if PC Harwood used "such force to cause his death" would Mr. Tomlinson not have had worse injuries than he had ? Stop sensationalising. The bloke was very ill, got into a demonstration, was drunk and would not do as he was told - he was treated the same as others, the Police in those situations do not have the capacity to say "sorry to bother you sir, but do you have any pre-existing health conditions that may affect you if I shove you and hit you with my baton " Get a grip. PC Harwood did not cause Ian Tomlinson's death. Did his actions contribute towards it, I do not doubt that. Should he be prosecuted for doing his job ? No he should not.

3. Do you know that in 2000, five years after he joined the Met, PC Harwood was involved in what was described at Mr Tomlinson's inquest as a "road rage" incident but his employment record was kept from the jury. He was off-duty and the other driver complained of unlawful arrest and abuse of authority. "PC" Harwood denied the accusation but retired on medical grounds in 2001 before a disciplinary hearing took place.

Yes and what is your point ? HOW is that relevant to his reactions in the front line of a riot situation ? It was not before the jury, because it has NO relevance.

4. Did you know that "PC" Harwood had over 10 complaints of recorded against him 12 years.

Again, what is your point ? How many criminals complain about the Police for no reason ? Let me tell you, thousands. Were any of the ten complaints upheld ?

Mr Tomlinson may have had his problems but he didnt do anything that deserved to be beaten by a police office causing injuries which caused his death. Do you disagree?

Tell me where I said that he deserved to be beaten and tell me where it says that the injuries - i.e. a push and a smack on the leg, caused injuries to his liver - that would already have been enlarged and infected due to his chronic alcoholic state ?

You do not get it. Stop bashing the Police for doing their job. Mr. Tomlinson has other issues which greatly contributed towards his death. PC Harwood, was just a small part of it and is the scapegoat for other's guilt at not looking after their own. Problem with this country is that too many people are too quick to blame others for stuff that just simply is not their fault.

Am I sorry Ian Tomlinson is dead ? Yes I am, but I am more sorry that he was let down by so many people leading up to it.

edstar says...
5:57pm Fri 20 Jul 12

I hope not wrote:
Edstar, because YOU bought the Daily Mail into this discussion, not me.

1. would Mr Tomlinson be alive if he hadnt met "PC" Harwood ?

Perhaps, or perhaps not, he had pre-existing health conditions, including those bought on by his chronic alcohol misuse, so who could say ?

2 What did he do that was so "Belligerent" that need Mr Tomlinson to be struck by "PC" Harwood with such force that it caused his death?

Sorry, if PC Harwood used "such force to cause his death" would Mr. Tomlinson not have had worse injuries than he had ? Stop sensationalising. The bloke was very ill, got into a demonstration, was drunk and would not do as he was told - he was treated the same as others, the Police in those situations do not have the capacity to say "sorry to bother you sir, but do you have any pre-existing health conditions that may affect you if I shove you and hit you with my baton " Get a grip. PC Harwood did not cause Ian Tomlinson's death. Did his actions contribute towards it, I do not doubt that. Should he be prosecuted for doing his job ? No he should not.

3. Do you know that in 2000, five years after he joined the Met, PC Harwood was involved in what was described at Mr Tomlinson's inquest as a "road rage" incident but his employment record was kept from the jury. He was off-duty and the other driver complained of unlawful arrest and abuse of authority. "PC" Harwood denied the accusation but retired on medical grounds in 2001 before a disciplinary hearing took place.

Yes and what is your point ? HOW is that relevant to his reactions in the front line of a riot situation ? It was not before the jury, because it has NO relevance.

4. Did you know that "PC" Harwood had over 10 complaints of recorded against him 12 years.

Again, what is your point ? How many criminals complain about the Police for no reason ? Let me tell you, thousands. Were any of the ten complaints upheld ?

Mr Tomlinson may have had his problems but he didnt do anything that deserved to be beaten by a police office causing injuries which caused his death. Do you disagree?

Tell me where I said that he deserved to be beaten and tell me where it says that the injuries - i.e. a push and a smack on the leg, caused injuries to his liver - that would already have been enlarged and infected due to his chronic alcoholic state ?

You do not get it. Stop bashing the Police for doing their job. Mr. Tomlinson has other issues which greatly contributed towards his death. PC Harwood, was just a small part of it and is the scapegoat for other's guilt at not looking after their own. Problem with this country is that too many people are too quick to blame others for stuff that just simply is not their fault.

Am I sorry Ian Tomlinson is dead ? Yes I am, but I am more sorry that he was let down by so many people leading up to it.
Actually I agree with you on your last couple of paragraphs. Where we differer is that I do think that PC harwood was, at least, in part responsible for Mr Tomlinsons death and for that he should be punished.

Surreydon says...
10:16pm Fri 20 Jul 12

I just hope that Mr Tomlinson's family don't receive a penny in compensation. They should get an A+ for acting and a C- for caring. They really are a feckless bunch of hypocrites!

PeterM says...
10:43pm Fri 20 Jul 12

It was correct that PC Harwood's previous behavior was not put to the jury, it should have no bearing as to whether he was guilty or not, but had he been found guilty then it should have been taken into account with his sentencing.

But I believe it is imperative that he leaves the force, either by being dismissed or given the opportunity to resign. If he remains a serving Officer this will send out the wrong message to the Public, i.e. the Police can do what they want and nothing will happen.

The second Postmortem clearly showed that Mr Tomlinson died as a result of the injuries that he received as a result of being hit by a baton and being pushed to the ground, both of which were caught on camera.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree