Lewisham & Greenwich RSS Feed


NEW CROSS: Family asked to pay rent after aunt died


A GRIEVING family was left “shocked” after a council demanded £336 in rent two months after their aunt died.

Gladys Lloyd, aged 81, lived in her council home of Saltwood House, Lovelinch Close, New Cross, for 34 years but died on November 19.

Her nephew and niece, James and Lisa Newton, followed the correct procedure of notifying Lewisham Homes and returning the keys to her property.

Two months later they received a demand for rent from the council's debt recovery team.

Mr Newton, said: “When we got the letter we were completely shocked.

“We let Lewisham Homes know within two days of my aunt's death. We were told to bring in the keys by a certain date and were given no other information about our responsibilities.”

The family have been told they must pay a month's rent at the full rate because Miss Lloyd’s housing benefit stopped when she passed away.

Mr Newton, of Beckwith Road, Herne Hill, said: “We think the policy is ridiculous.

“Communication with the next of kin needs to be in written and oral form immediately.”

The 41-year-old added: “We would like to see a couple of weeks' grace for the families to clear the property.”

Whitefoot ward councillor Pete Pattisson was contacted by the family asking for help.

Cllr Pattisson said: “It must be so hard to be dealing with the loss of a loved one, only to find you are being chased by the council for the rent for the month following their death.”

He added: “While the council does need to maintain its rental income, there must be a more sensitive way to handle this.”

Lewisham Homes has been managing tenants' homes on behalf of Lewisham Council since 2007.

A spokesman said: “We understand this is a difficult time for Miss Lloyd’s family and we are very sorry for any distress caused to them.

“We recognise we could have dealt with the situation more sensitively and have instructed staff to look at cases such as these on an individual basis and our communications with bereaved relatives and next of kin.”


Your Say YourLondon

Brook, Deptford says...
12:17pm Sun 7 Feb 10

At the end of the day the rent comes out of the persons estate not from the relatives.

madras, petts wood says...
6:38pm Sun 7 Feb 10

Brook wrote:
At the end of the day the rent comes out of the persons estate not from the relatives.
you're all heart...

porkpie, SE London says...
9:55am Mon 8 Feb 10

madras wrote:
Brook wrote: At the end of the day the rent comes out of the persons estate not from the relatives.
you're all heart...
Well it's the truth. Also seeing as it was all sorted and Lewisham Homes said sorry will re-train was there any need to run off to the the local papers??????

AnnieN, East Dulwich says...
4:04pm Tue 9 Feb 10

I assume you are acquainted with the deceased and are fully in the know of how much she had in her estate? Has it not occurred to you that someone living in a council house, receiving housing benefit, probably didnt have any money in their estate and therefore the local authority was just chancing their arm? Maybe going to the papers was the only way the family felt some sort of justification.

The Peckham Pouncer, says...
10:26pm Thu 11 Feb 10

At the end of the day...it gets dark! and the whole point of the article was to highlight the fact that the money should never have demanded in the first place.
And why shouldn't this story and others like it make the papers?..stories like this highlight some of the ridiculous and petty beaurocracy that is advocated and commonly administered by people in local government organisations who do not have a section on common sense in the rule books that they work from.

porkpie, SE London says...
10:15am Fri 12 Feb 10

The Peckham Pouncer wrote:
At the end of the day...it gets dark! and the whole point of the article was to highlight the fact that the money should never have demanded in the first place. And why shouldn't this story and others like it make the papers?..stories like this highlight some of the ridiculous and petty beaurocracy that is advocated and commonly administered by people in local government organisations who do not have a section on common sense in the rule books that they work from.
I got sent a letter for someone that lived in my house 35 years ago - I don't need to run to the press. I dealt with privately. Mistakes happen, this was highlighted and the firm has sorted it.

The Peckham Pouncer, says...
5:07pm Fri 12 Feb 10

Not a case of 'running' to the press..its issues like this that make the news..thats why people read the papers..why should they be exposed for their incompetence..this was not the first time something like this has happened nor, unfortunately will it be the last..but too many people hide behind 'computer errors' etc..and this was a little more serious than a 'letter'

Forgetit, se london says...
9:39am Mon 15 Feb 10

The fact of the matter is the council is asking for money and the relatives hav e done as they were asked.
Once they keys are handed back then you shouldnt be responsible for the property any more. Someone in the council has not recorded correctly that the keys have been handed back. Its ok for them to make mistakes but the tenants always have to pay for it.

Comments are closed on this article.

James Newton and Councillor Pete Pattisson outside Miss Lloyd's old flat James Newton and Councillor Pete Pattisson outside Miss Lloyd's old flat

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »