10:11pm Monday 28th February 2011 in Where I Live By Michael Purton
BROMLEY Council has approved a list of more than 150 budget cuts totalling £33m in front of a packed public gallery at the Civic Centre tonight.
Councillors voted to approve the draft budget for the next year and additional savings for 2012/13, with just three councillors, who are Labour members, voting against the proposals.
This follows the council discovering its funding from central government will be reduced by at least £33m over the next two years.
Councillor Stephen Carr, leader of the Conservative council, told the chamber the cuts had been made necessary by the “ineptitude” of the previous Labour central government.
He said: “We tonight and certainly over the next year or two are going to have to make some very difficult and unpalatable decisions to correct the blunders of 13 years of Labour.”
Protesters and the borough’s Labour group had called on the council to use some of its £51.9m reserves to save services facing the axe.
However, Cllr Carr told the chamber: “We will not be spending money out of the council’s reserves to support ongoing revenue funding.”
He added: “It would be totally irresponsible to do anything else. The country is in the position it is in today because of the economics of the mad house, or should I say the economics of Labour.
“This administration will not take that sort of approach with this borough’s wellbeing.”
Councillors also voted to freeze council tax.
- Stopping the in-house homecare provision – saving £400,000 in 2011-2012 and £600,000 in 2012-13.
- Reducing the funding to sheltered housing – saving £500,000 in 2011-2012 and £800,000 in 2012-2013.
- Ending grants to poor families for school uniforms and shoes – to save £100,000 in the 2011-2012 and £200,000 in 2012-2013.
- Axing school crossing patrols – saving £0 in 2011-2012 and £233,000 in 2012-13.
- Slashing the number of councillors from 60 to 40 – change cannot be brought in until election in 2014 so no savings for years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013.
- Having just three children and family centres across the borough rather than the 23 originally planned – saving £600,000 in 2011-2012 and £2.8m in 2012-13.
- Closing either Penge or Anerley library – saving £90,000 in 2012-2013.
- Closing park toilets, reducing grants to sports clubs, reducing allotment rents, stopping park events and campaigns and reducing support to Park Friends – saving £10,000 in 2011-2012 and £53,000 in 2012-2013.
- Introducing car parking charges at countryside sites – saving £30,000 in 2011-2012 and £50,000 in 2012-2013.
- Cllr Carr says there will also be staff redundancies at the council.
The budget does include an additional £900,000 to support adults with learning difficulties and £600,000 for adults with physical disabilities.
An extra £1.7m has also been set out for transporting children with special education needs and protecting children at risk.
During the meeting, the leader of the Bromley Labour group, Councillor John Getgood, said the cuts were too severe.
He told the chamber: “We accept cuts have to be made but not with this severity.”
Cllr Getgood said the council should use money from its reserves to save services.
He said: “We’re not proposing a complete run down of reserves but a considered use, during the four year cycle, of up to £12m or £13m.”
Cllr Getgood also said the council should increase council tax by one per cent to raise £1.3m to avoid cuts.
He proposed the council turn down 13 of the planned savings, including the reduction in funding for pupil clothing and footwear, and the axing of school crossing patrols.
Member of the public Adele Titford also addressed the councillors during the meeting to voice her opposition to ending funding for crossing patrols.
The 48-year-old mum aimed a question at Councillor Colin Smith, the portfolio holder for the environment, who has said the council is not scrapping the patrols but looking at alternative ways of providing them, such as through volunteers.
Mrs Titford, of Hayesford Park in Bromley, asked: “How many volunteers will the council have to recruit, train and insure before the £233,000 you want to save is reached?
“And do you still plan to axe the lollipop people even if any net saving is far less than the £233,000 you’re aiming to save?”
Cllr Smith said the council had made no firm decisions on the alternatives yet and that “there are no certainties at this stage”.
Comments(18)
Ice & Snow
says...
9:49am Tue 1 Mar 11
Galv Norris
says...
9:58am Tue 1 Mar 11
Ice & Snow wrote:SAw it on the BBC breakfast show this morning,the Minister for overseas development said we in britain have a duty to help the rest of the world!!!
Can't blame Bromley Council OR any other council across the map ... the coalition Government is determined to cut costs to bring the national debt down ... yep i got that bit ... then i read in my newspaper that the "Overseas development budget" is being "Increased" ... Err why is that? If we have to make cuts in this country with local communities taking a hit ... why is the overseas budget being "increased" to some countries? Its not right that some community groups have had 100% grants and support ... slashed ... yet we are allowing the coalition to chuck money abroad while our own services are cut? Disgusting!
snoop dogg
says...
10:06am Tue 1 Mar 11
Ice & Snow wrote:The Little Englanders are out and about today alright...
Can't blame Bromley Council OR any other council across the map ... the coalition Government is determined to cut costs to bring the national debt down ... yep i got that bit ... then i read in my newspaper that the "Overseas development budget" is being "Increased" ... Err why is that? If we have to make cuts in this country with local communities taking a hit ... why is the overseas budget being "increased" to some countries? Its not right that some community groups have had 100% grants and support ... slashed ... yet we are allowing the coalition to chuck money abroad while our own services are cut? Disgusting!
MB
says...
10:30am Tue 1 Mar 11
snoop dogg wrote:There is also a very selfish motivation for foreign aid which everybody should understand: if we and other rich nations don't do this there will be many more refugees and immigrants to our countries if people do not have access to food or healthcare in their own countries. Once they come here with their expended family the cost of supporting them increases thousandfold, or even more in the case of HIV positive immigrants.
Ice & Snow wrote: Can't blame Bromley Council OR any other council across the map ... the coalition Government is determined to cut costs to bring the national debt down ... yep i got that bit ... then i read in my newspaper that the "Overseas development budget" is being "Increased" ... Err why is that? If we have to make cuts in this country with local communities taking a hit ... why is the overseas budget being "increased" to some countries? Its not right that some community groups have had 100% grants and support ... slashed ... yet we are allowing the coalition to chuck money abroad while our own services are cut? Disgusting!The Little Englanders are out and about today alright... Yes, of course there is some pain to follow, but it's nothing like what this country had to go through in the 1930's and 40's when the men and women of those countries whose aid budget you now seek to cut came to our rescue and fought for Britain against Hitler and the Axis. The UK has benefitted massively from its position in the world, and any investment overseas is repaid many times over. So lets get a sense of perspective here.
Rattler One Seven
says...
11:39am Tue 1 Mar 11
Familyguy321
says...
12:13pm Tue 1 Mar 11
DJH
says...
2:15pm Tue 1 Mar 11
Clare L F
says...
5:09pm Tue 1 Mar 11
Cllr. Neil Reddin
says...
8:13pm Tue 1 Mar 11
Clare L F wrote:The reserves are "supporting and sustaining vital services" already; the £2.7m+ interest that we earn on those reserves is £2.7m+ that we won't have to find in more cuts.
What is the point of having £51.9m in reserve if not for supporting and sustaining vital services in the face of cuts? In what situation would Stephen Carr consider using this?
Excalibur
says...
8:06am Wed 2 Mar 11
UK Pensioner
says...
9:15am Wed 2 Mar 11
Excalibur
says...
9:29am Wed 2 Mar 11
Sand asa Pand
says...
10:00am Wed 2 Mar 11
kali_karmooma
says...
10:33am Wed 2 Mar 11
UK Pensioner wrote:Well said old timer!
PLease do not say that sending tax payers hard earned money on foreign aid is anything to do with the war that is not right.There should be a halt to all foreign aid for 5 years that money could go to keeping local amenities open get out of afghanistan and save billions of pounds.UK Pensioners should get free broadband doubling of there OAP Pension free TV license 50% of TElephone bills along with assistance for gas and electric not a one of cold weather payment its about time we put pensioners first in this country instead of paying out billions on wars and foreign aid.Thank you.
Oldchap
says...
3:31pm Wed 2 Mar 11
typecastboy
says...
9:34pm Mon 7 Mar 11
Bromleyresident
says...
9:32pm Tue 8 Mar 11
Search for Jobs
Search Now »
Find the right person for you
Search Now »
Search for Homes
Search Now »
Search for Cars
Search Now »
jca111 says...
8:40am Tue 1 Mar 11
How out of touch this man must be!