Where I Live RSS Feed


Bromley Council unveils first wave of £41m cuts

Council leader Councillor Stephen Carr says things have to be done on a worst case scenario basis Council leader Councillor Stephen Carr says things have to be done on a worst case scenario basis

COUNCILLORS have been accused of 'stealing the clothes off children’s backs' after a list of proposed cuts to council services in Bromley was published last night.

The proposal comes after Bromley Council learned its funding from central government will be reduced by £22m over two years.

Along with the £5m savings already required in-year this represents cumulative cash savings of £27m.

And the council estimates a further grant and funding loss amounting to at least £19m during the financial years 2013 to 2014 and 2014 to 2015.

Proposals for savings

= Stop giving grants to poor families for school uniforms and shoes – to save £100,000 in the coming financial year and £200,000 in 2012-2013.

= Have just three children and family centres across the borough rather than the 23 which were originally planned – saving £600,000 in 2011-2012 and £2.8m in 2012-13.

= Axe the school crossing patrols – saving £0 in the coming financial year and £233,000 in 2012-13.

= Close either Penge or Anerley library – saving £90,000 in 2012-2013.

= Close park toilets, reduce grants to sports clubs, allotment rents, stop park events and campaigns and reduce support to Park Friends – saving £10,000 in 2011-2012 and 53,000 in 2012-2013.

Related links

= Introduce car parking charges at countryside sites – saving £30,000 in 2011-2012 and £50,000 in 2012-2013.

= Slash the number of councillors from 60 to 40 – change cannot be brought in until election in 2014 so no savings for years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013.

Glenn Kelly is preparing to fight against the cuts

Council staff representative Glenn Kelly listened as the cuts were discussed.

Speaking after the meeting he said: “They are stealing the clothes off the poorest children in the borough’s backs by ending the grant for children who cannot afford school uniform.

“On top of the service cuts there will be the jobs to go with it.

“There are more details yet to come and it is now our intention to get the staff and the people to fight back.

“We demand they use the £50m reserves to stop any cut then they should fight back and get the grants that the government has stolen.

Union is prepared to fight against the cuts

“If they do not then between the workers in the borough, the trade unions and the community we have to mount the biggest campaign that the council has ever seen.

“If Bromley councillors do not have the guts to stand up for the people of the borough then they should be forced to stand down and let people who will take their place.”

Cllr Stephen Carr

Bromley Council leader Councillor Stephen Carr says he is fighting the government to try and get more money in grants.

Cllr Carr said: “I think the government does recognise the flaws in the current system but you cannot expect it to change in one year.”

At the moment Bromley gets just £296.35 in grants per head of population which is the second lowest in London behind Richmond.

Cllr Carr added: “We have to do things on a worst case scenario basis and are always cautious on our approach.

“These are tough times but I am confident that the budget for 2011-12 will keep us on a sound financial footing.

“As a council we are known for giving value for money and have a reputation for managing our resources well.

There will be redundancies

“We have identified £4m of savings in support functions and will continue to look for further savings by examining and modifying how we do things.

“Regrettably when dealing with budget savings on this scale there will be redundancies but we will manage our vacancies to avoid compulsory redundancies where we can.

“I am also determined we will not shy away from continuing to question everything we do.

“I want to emphasise that the potential savings we have in front of us aren’t about gimmicks or trying to make a good story out of a difficult situation but about creating certainty and stability.

“Because the decisions we make over the coming months are not just about this year or the next but about our future and our children’s future.”

Send your feedback about the cuts to the council by emailing leader@bromley.gov.uk or sent to The Leader’s Office, Civic Centre, Stockwell Close, BR1 3UH.

The issues will be discussed at Executive meetings on February 2 and February 14 which are open to the public, as are the policy, development and scrutiny committees.

Comments(13)

cookster says...
10:25am Thu 13 Jan 11

I wonder how much they could save by not polishing their tables every day?

DJH says...
12:51pm Thu 13 Jan 11

I agree with the first and last one.

DirtyElegance says...
1:10pm Thu 13 Jan 11

= Introduce car parking charges at countryside sites – saving £30,000 in 2011-2012 and £50,000 in 2012-2013.

Saving money or MAKING money?

ginger55 says...
1:42pm Thu 13 Jan 11

I think it's disgusting that the first 3 proposals listed will all directly affect the well being of children and low income families.
Uniform has got to come from the School Shop because the school badge and logo are embroidered on and that cost a fortune.

"Children and Family Centres have been established across the borough in the last few years. They bring together all the different support agencies to offer a wide range of free services to meet the needs of children under five and their parents/carers, all in one place." Quoted from the Councils own website.
Only 3 in the borough will put extreme pressure on the staff, create horrendous waiting lists and untold pressures on families. (I speak from experiences with my own children)

Do away with crossing patrols? What planet has this come from... sounds like council is willing to see accident deaths drastically increase among school children. But then, the councillors children are no doubt driven to school and dropped door, not like the thousands that have to use public transport or walk to get an education.
So much for progress, not to mention the health and safety of our children and the unemployment caused!!!

Bovine Juice says...
2:00pm Thu 13 Jan 11

A list that is predominently made up of cuts to financial assistance and services to the poorest. Never has the phrase "We're all in this together" masked a more cynical attempt to hit those who can least afford it while protecting those who can. Despicable. Shame on you Cameron, Osborne and your footsoldiers at the Council.

GeoffR says...
2:16pm Thu 13 Jan 11

I agree - the poorest and children will be hit hardest, which is wrong, as the bankers are just about to walk away with an average £200K bonus each. Also closing all the toilets? Crazy!

Why spend £2.7 Million on referbing your council offices last year and then cut so much for the kids? The majority of that list above could stay if it wasn't for those refurbishments.

Also remember the council has £50 Million in reserve. That's in case of a rainy day - surely this qualifies?

"Power to the people" - this will be remembered councillors.

Somthing has to be done about this.

Joan of Ark says...
4:33pm Thu 13 Jan 11

I agree with some of them (not all) and it is quite right too in respect of the school uniform (and shoes!!!) grant - most schools have second hand or used clothing facilities. I also know full well that most if not all of these families who claim this "Nanny Stare" grant have kids who have mobiles, games consoles, expensive trainers and all the latest malarkey but suddenly claim poverty when they need a new sweatshirt or PE top.

They should also stop free school dinners and save more money, in this day and age the taxpayer should not still have to feed other people's children, whatever happened to a home-made sandwich, banana, pkt of crisps and a cheap yoghurt, they feed them in the holidays and at weekends, why not Monday to Friday lunchtime. - if you have kids feed and dress them yourselves and if things are tight, cut down on the fags, beer and take-aways.

DJH says...
4:53pm Thu 13 Jan 11

Well said Joan of Ark, totally agree. Basic school uniform is cheap enough, just shop at Primark or Asda or as you said secondhand from the School. It is only really the blazer that is expensive as it has to have the Badge on.

If you choose to have children, you pay for them. Fed up with 'choose to be non workers' pumping out the kids and getting everything for them. All that teaches them is a lack of respect and non responsibility.

Biscuit says...
6:06pm Thu 13 Jan 11

I agree with the above two comments.

Some people seem to think that people on benefits are "the poor".

bizzymum says...
6:40pm Thu 13 Jan 11

My sons school has an 'embroidered' badge which you iron on to the blazer - it costs a quid. The blazer you can buy probably in Asda for another couple of quid.

Toilets - well I would prefer to see them stay because if they go then all we will see is people running to the bushes in desperate need and then an 'up-surge' of flashers being reported in the borough parks. Bet the true cost of that one is more than paying the toilet cleaner.

As for getting rid of school crossing patrols - how many dead children before the council admit this is their biggest mistake. Save our Lollipops!

mr2wheels100 says...
10:01am Fri 14 Jan 11

So my Council tax is now buying school uniforms for 'poor' families? I thought it was to pay to empty my bins, pay for local road repairs etc. . . .

I thought benefits were to pay for clothes and shoes.

Why is it these 'poor' families always have a 42" flat screen, the latest leather suite from D.F.S. and have more gold sovereign rings on their fingers then the UK has in gold reserves.

Pity they couldn't buy their kids a school uniform, before rushing to Argos to get the latest jewellery.

HayesMum says...
6:26pm Tue 18 Jan 11

I agree with all of them except the scrapping of lollipop ladies/gents. There are too many idiot drivers on the roads that don't take extra (any) care near schools. This will result in children getting injured or killed - madness !

City-Square Mile says...
1:39pm Wed 19 Jan 11

GeoffR " agree - the poorest and children will be hit hardest, which is wrong, as the bankers are just about to walk away with an average £200K bonus each"

Please tell me where bankers salaries and or bonus comes into play here!!

Are you only talking about the banks that the UK government helped to bail out or all bankers....a rather irrational and niave look at the world!!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree