Redbridge
| TOP STORIES |  | | | | | | FEATURES | | | | | | MAYOR NEWS | | | | TRAVEL | | | | COMPETITIONS | | |
|
|
|
SOUTH WOODFORD: Traders fear CCTV will drive away custom
 |
| Kerk Davies of the South Woodford Business Partnership |
TRADERS who battled to have CCTV installed in their area to help fight crime now want the plan scrapped after the council said it would use the cameras to target motorists.
Shopkeepers in George Lane, South Woodford, have campaigned for years to get the road linked up to the council's closed circuit system.
And they were granted their wish earlier this month when funding was allocated for 11 new cameras.
But celebrations were cut short when the council announced it would also use the security cameras to enforce parking restrictions, a move many traders believe is simply a revenue-raising exercise.
Their criticism comes after a senior Met policeman questioned the effectiveness of CCTV in helping to tackle street crime in London.
Kerk Davies, chairman of the South Woodford Business Partnership, said some shopkeepers fear the move could drive customers away from George Lane altogether.
He said: "Some of us are concerned that the council is planning to use these CCTV cameras for the wrong reasons.
"If they use them primarily to target drivers, this could scare them away from shopping here at all.
"If you ask me whether I would prefer to lose a few quid from thieves or dozens of regular customers who are scared away by parking fines, then I know which one I would choose.
"This is not the reason we requested the cameras in the first place, and if they are going to be introduced primarily for revenue raising, I would prefer for them not to be there at all."
These views were backed by Shailesh Katira, manager of Allen's Pharmacy, who said the cameras should not be used to target motorists.
He said: "Motorists are easier to target with cameras than criminals, but that is not a good enough reason to have them."
A council spokeswoman said: "The primary reason for the introduction of CCTV cameras across the borough is to give a feeling of security, enhance community safety and help to reduce crime."
But she added: "From July 2008 we will be using CCTV systems to enforce parking restrictions and to identify moving traffic offences, such as people driving in bus lanes and illegal turns."
2:32pm Friday 9th May 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: Mr Khalid, walthamstow on 7:06am Tue 13 May 08
is the kek davids idots? he complanes want tv cctvs and now is complanes becose he noe can parks he cars and loseded the customs? i thinks he stupits becose the parson can useded the beys streets and carparked naer to the sanesbary and why get tikededs? no good for the parson if this takway this tv cctv becose the mugers and the bad parsons wins
is the kek davids idots? he complanes want tv cctvs and now is complanes becose he noe can parks he cars and loseded the customs? i thinks he stupits becose the parson can useded the beys streets and carparked naer to the sanesbary and why get tikededs? no good for the parson if this takway this tv cctv becose the mugers and the bad parsons wins
Posted by: Jim Woods, South Woodford on 6:15pm Wed 28 May 08
Kerk Davies sounds like a hypocrite. First he campaigns for council money for security cameras, no doubt saying how important the cameras are for his group of shopkeepers. Now he is quotes as saying that the loss from theft is a few quid ("I would prefer to lose a few quid from thieves" etc).
Why, Mr Davies, have you campaigned to take tax payers money for something which you now suggest is no big deal after all. It seems to me that this money would have been better spent on more deserving projects than the ungrateful shopkeepers of South Woodford.
Kerk Davies sounds like a hypocrite. First he campaigns for council money for security cameras, no doubt saying how important the cameras are for his group of shopkeepers. Now he is quotes as saying that the loss from theft is a few quid ("I would prefer to lose a few quid from thieves" etc).
Why, Mr Davies, have you campaigned to take tax payers money for something which you now suggest is no big deal after all. It seems to me that this money would have been better spent on more deserving projects than the ungrateful shopkeepers of South Woodford.
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
