Where I Live RSS Feed


Wycombe District Council's £40k on housing 'propaganda'

Council's £40k on housing 'propaganda' Council's £40k on housing 'propaganda'

COUNCIL chiefs are spending almost £40,000 on a magazine branded ‘propaganda’ urging tenants to back a housing sell off.

Figures obtained by The Bucks Free Press show £37,675 will be spent on five issues of ‘Housing Transfer Matters’ by Wycombe District Council.

The glossy magazine is being delivered to about 7,000 tenants’ homes ahead of an October vote to sell off the homes.

Opponents of the sell off say the information provided is one-sided and does not present arguments against.

Yet a council chief said the magazine was vetted by outside bodies – and there were no negatives.

Three issues have been delivered so far, costing £7,535. Two more will be produced, bringing the total cost to £37,675.

It has come out of a £995,000 council pot being spent on the vote, which is proposing to sell the homes to a ‘tenant led’ housing association.

Paul Burnham, spokesman for the Defend Council Housing campaign, branded the magazine ‘propaganda’.

He said: “We want a level playing field of debate. Huge amounts of resources are being poured into just one point of view.”

The council says it cannot spend enough on homes as it has to hand half of its rent cash back to the Government. A housing association would keep all cash, it says.

But Mr Burnham said he was concerned about tenancy rights and ‘the fact that private funding will mean private interests dominate’ – and these were not featured.

The latest issue includes an article on a five year rent increase ‘guarantee’ and ‘frequently asked questions’ including the question: ‘transfer just sounds too good to be true?’ The March issue includes an interview with the chairman of a similar organisation in Watford who said moving away from the town’s council had led to a ‘real improvement’.

But the association, Watford Community Housing Trust, was only rated as good as the district council in March by the national Audit Commission spending watchdog, a rating of ‘fair’.

Yet Cllr Chris Watson said: “It is our job to ensure they are properly informed of all the options. It is factual information.”

The magazine says content is checked by the Homes and Communities Agency, ‘specialist lawyers’, the Tenant Services Authority and its independent tenants’ advisor, Solon, which is being paid by WDC.

Cllr Watson said of criticism of the magazine: “We are hard put to find any negatives. The biggest negative is probably a psychological one.”

A vote to transfer the homes to a regular housing association was defeated in 2000.

The £995,000 will be repaid only in the event of a yes vote from the new housing association, to be called Red Kite Community Housing.

Its board would include six tenants, one leaseholder, three council nominees and five independents.

Cllr Watson said he expected the council to get less than £10m if the homes are sold.

Click the links below to read the magazine and see more stories about the plan.

Comments(11)

Agniesca says...
10:04am Wed 9 Jun 10

At issue is what delivers the better quality housing at the lower cost.

michael healy says...
11:30am Wed 9 Jun 10

Well i for one wont be voting for the transfer to this red kite lot. We are quite ok as we are and we do not want to be transfered over to another body at all. I dont think the council are telling us the whole truth on this matter so we should all say NO NO NO. Wasting our money on magazines trying to hoodwink us more like. They spend our money as if its their own and we have no say in it at all. All us tenants are not stupid and we will vote No when the time comes just to show the council they cannot move us from a to b when it suits them!!!!

sparky49 says...
11:37am Wed 9 Jun 10

As a longstanding tenant who remebers the last attempt to dump us, I will be voting against this madness and complete lack respect to WDC tenants.

katodeza says...
2:48pm Wed 9 Jun 10

Maybe there would be sufficient funds for Riley Rec if WDC spent less on printed material - I get sick of it dropping through my letterbox.

Catflap says...
4:02pm Wed 9 Jun 10

if i remember, the leaflet sent out by the Defend Council Housing campaign was flawed with inaccuracies and accused the council of all sorts that it hadn't done. I am no fan of WDC but I think 'better the devil you know'

tomcat says...
7:37pm Wed 9 Jun 10

I voted NO last time. I will vote NO this time. As Catflap says " better the devil you know"

Wycombe Council seems intent on selling off, everything they can.

Voyeur says...
6:22am Thu 10 Jun 10

The trouble with WDC consultations is that they highlight the benefits but don't tell people about the disadvantages. That is left to others. In that way WDC builds up mistrust of its motives.
.
With a new coalition government in power, why doesn't WDC lobby them to get them to change the rules to stop taking 50% of the rental income and 50% of the Right to Buy sales?
.
That would then overcome the problem of lack of money for repairs and new investment.
.
Why is WDC pushing ahead for the transfer now when there is going to be a real change in the way Government expenditure is made in future.
.
Why doesn't WDC wait and see what the new rules are under the new coalition government?

jackyboy says...
2:19pm Fri 11 Jun 10

I am not living in social housing, but in an area with a mixture of council owned houses and houses that have been sold. I just hope that if the housing stock is sold off the housing associations will be harder on their tenants when it comes to anti-social behaviour and the way the properties are looked after. I have lived near a family for quite a few years that have caused endless misery and disturbance to their neighbours, including abuse and threats made to many of us.Many neighbours of this family have complained to the council/police, but no real action taken, to our frustration and dismay.
Now another of my neighbours have sold up and gone, due to the lifestyle and behaviour of a family that moved in to a council owned house that had been tenanted by a lady who loved her garden - now it looks like a rubbish dump, and totally uncared for, and the tenant and her visitors have screaming rows, have damaged cars and generally driven their neighbours out, from a home that they loved.

I just feel that these tenants are so lucky to have been given social housing, so why can't they behave in a more neighbourly way and take care of the properties and gardens with some pride and consideration for others? I know this letter may sound rather harsh, but it only comes after a long period of upsetting bahaviour, I would move if I could afford to!

sparky49 says...
11:01am Sat 12 Jun 10

jackyboy wrote:
I am not living in social housing, but in an area with a mixture of council owned houses and houses that have been sold. I just hope that if the housing stock is sold off the housing associations will be harder on their tenants when it comes to anti-social behaviour and the way the properties are looked after. I have lived near a family for quite a few years that have caused endless misery and disturbance to their neighbours, including abuse and threats made to many of us.Many neighbours of this family have complained to the council/police, but no real action taken, to our frustration and dismay.
Now another of my neighbours have sold up and gone, due to the lifestyle and behaviour of a family that moved in to a council owned house that had been tenanted by a lady who loved her garden - now it looks like a rubbish dump, and totally uncared for, and the tenant and her visitors have screaming rows, have damaged cars and generally driven their neighbours out, from a home that they loved.

I just feel that these tenants are so lucky to have been given social housing, so why can't they behave in a more neighbourly way and take care of the properties and gardens with some pride and consideration for others? I know this letter may sound rather harsh, but it only comes after a long period of upsetting bahaviour, I would move if I could afford to!
Jackyboy You are so lucky to have been able to buy your own property. It is small minded people like your self who are no better than the so called bad tenants. Oh how you wish you lived in SL7 without Social/Council tenants as neighbours, me thinks you are looking for utopia. It is a shame people like you stigmatise Social tenants in this way, the majority of us tenants look after our houses and gardens, if I am going to live here for 3 score and 10 then I want my house to be nice. An apology is due to the very many tenants who are not as you describe.

sparky49 says...
11:09am Sat 12 Jun 10

Just one more thing Jacky boy SL7 1JL ? Is this not a road with council houses in. mmm Dont want to be a tenant, but will buy an ex council house, if so, then YES you too live in a council house, you can change the door but it is still a council house. SNOB.

jackyboy says...
1:27pm Mon 14 Jun 10

In answer, I do not think all social housing tenants are the same, most of the neighbours where I live get on really well, both in owned and rented houses. I was talking about one family who at one point terrorised the road and their neighbours, I am talking about drug use, abuse, threats, fights in the street, constant swearing and screaming etc and heaven help you if you dared to voice your concerns to them- this would result in a visit to your door and a threat of 'we'll get you'. My concern is and was the lack of effective measures taken by the council in answer to complaints, records were lost, appointments were made and not kept and the response was a shambles. I don't apologise for expecting and hoping for a certain standard of behaviour from anyone, whereever they live, and I feel that the council let us down on this occasion. That is the only point that I was making, I was not generalising about anyone.

Also, being able to buy a house is not just lucky, it means a lot of sacrifice, worry, and if the mortgage isn't paid, where will we go - not to a house provided by the local authority as there aren't any available.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree