Where I Live RSS Feed


Tesco's Amersham wind turbine plans rejected


A SUPERMARKET’S green policy was attacked by councillors this evening after a planned wind turbine was described as a “futile piece of gimmickry” and a “grotesque form of tokenism”.

Members of Chiltern District Council’s planning committee added the amount of electricity generated by the turbine was insufficient and could not be justified.

Tesco submitted a bid to build a 35 ft turbine to provide power for its store in Old Amersham, which would have been put up in the car park.

A report stated it would have a capacity of 6 kilowatts – which Cllr Nick Rose said would not supply enough power for his home “for more than a few minutes”.

Cllr Robert Burns-Green was scathing in his comments on the proposals, telling the committee: “It will be welcomed with excitement, if it goes ahead, by carbon footprint disciples and the Al Gore school of hysterics.

“The intention of Tesco is to infest the country with these things to say to people impressed by these things ‘We are doing our best to save the planet’. Well, I’m not impressed.

“It’s a futile piece of gimmickry.”

He said: “One of the supporters said it’s a commendable gesture and that’s what it is – a gesture,” adding it would be “an eyesore”.

Cllr Davida Allen said the council had received a number of letters from concerned members of the Chiltern Society and Amersham Society, which she described as “authoritative bodies”.

She said: “It will be highly visible from the roads round about and against the green backdrop.

“It will be visible from Ruckles Field, which is of major historical importance. It’s where the Martyrs Memorial is.”

She added: “Windmills work best on hills. This is not a hill, this is a basin of a river valley.”

Cllr Nick Rose said: “It’s fairly visual – it’s difficult to miss it. Its visual impact will be overwhelming. It’s a grotesque form of tokenism.

“I can’t see how this will supply four UK households. It wouldn’t supply mine for more than a few minutes.”

The application was rejected by eight votes to two, after officers had recommended planning permission be granted.

Comments(7)

Hit me says...
9:20pm Thu 14 May 09

1) "mine for more than a few minutes" shows you have zero understanding of how the magical electicity thing works (Bet you still turn the sockets of in case it leaks)

2) "the Al Gore school of hysterics" is actually well documented evidence. Shame you didnt take the time to do any research

3) “It’s a futile piece of gimmickry.” .....and you solution is to DO NOTHING.

Heres hoping that Tesco come back with a plab to line the place with enough turbines to not only power their store, but to provide xs. I am sure, given the reasoning above, that the council will then have no hesitation in approving the application.

Or was it really rejected because some of the councillors dont like the look of them. Well, not in my back yard anyway.

Hypocrites.

Slacker says...
9:28pm Thu 14 May 09

Futile piece of gimmickry eh?

Would this be the same council who APPROVED the building of a wind turbine of similar height in the grounds of Carrington School in Flackwell?

Blueberry says...
11:26pm Thu 14 May 09

No Slacker, it is not the same council.

Amersham is in Chiltern district (as the article says) and Flackwell is in Wucombe district.

erm says...
12:56am Fri 15 May 09

we should run the store from all that hot air the councillors are spouting

Tref says...
5:12pm Fri 15 May 09

I'm in two minds about this. On one hand the Councillors are right that this is smallfry when it comes to saving/generating energy, on the other hand I think we should be encouraging anything like this. Our green and pleasant landscape has been evolving as a result of humans for centuries, and wind turbines will figure in the future for many properties.

Voyeur says...
5:16pm Fri 15 May 09

Didn't someone famous once say "The journey of 1,000 miles starts with just one step"??

Do councillors really want plans for a huge wind farm before they will approve anything green?

rambler241 says...
11:39am Sat 16 May 09

The place for a wind turbine is on a windy hilltop, not a deep valley.

I don't subscribe to the "CO2 school" of thought, BUT very little consideration is ever given to the "carbon cost" of actually manufacturing and installing small wind turbines. It would take many years to recoup that cost, quite apart from the monetary cost.

This smacks of "tokenism" to my mind - Tesco is just trying to improve its image.


Store turbine bid blown away by planners Store turbine bid blown away by planners

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses