LEYTON: Review launched into approval of Olympic marshes site

Protesters at the construction site on Leyton Marshes in April Protesters at the construction site on Leyton Marshes in April

A JUDICIAL review has been launched into a decision to allow an Olympic training centre to be built on public land.

The Save Leyton Marsh group announced today (Thursday) that it has taken out the review to establish whether Waltham Forest Council had acted lawfully in giving planning permission to a proposal to build a temporary basketball court on the green space off Lea Bridge Road.

The Olympic Delivery Authority's (ODA) plan was controversially approved in February despite a petition against it signed by 1,250 people, with the majority of councillors agreeing with the ODA that the Olympics created "exceptional circumstances" which justified building it.

But protesters claim there are plenty of alternative sites athletes could have used to train, such as nearby leisure facilities.

The group's spokeswoman, Caroline Day, said: "It's protected land, which is why we've taken out the judicial review. We think the council should never have granted it planning permission because of the other sites that weren't even explored as options.

"The development so far has caused alarm, nuisance and has been disastrous from the start."

The centre's construction has been dogged by controversies including an evacuation caused by an unexploded bomb from the Second World War that was excavated and allegations that diggers had unearthed rubble containing asbestos.

But Ms Day admitted that even if successful the review was unlikely to bring a halt to the works.

"It's academic in terms of the facility - it's being built," she added. "But it's very important in the long term because if we show they have acted unlawfully we can get stronger protection for the land in the future, it strengthens our hand."

However, the review could crumble if the campaigners are unsuccessful in their application for a protective cost order, which would mean they would need to pay thousands of pounds to see the review progress.

The group was evicted after peacefully protesting on the construction site in April to deny workers access, fearing the building will permanently damage the green space - something the ODA denies.

But fellow campaigner Simon Moore, 29, had an ASBO handed to him for his part in the protest extended by two years yesterday (June 19).

It means he cannot go within 100 yards of any Olympic venue or event.

Ms Day said: "We are disgusted. This is an example of the law being used to deny people of their right to protest."

Mr Moore will speak about his ASBO at an open meeting on Tuesday (June 26) between 7pm and 9pm at Harmony Hall, Truro Road, in Walthamstow.

A council spokeswoman said: “A claim has been brought against the council by the Save Leyton Marshes group regarding temporary planning permission granted for basketball training courts to be used during Games time. The council is defending the claim on the grounds that its decision was lawful."

The Guardian is awaiting comment from the ODA.

Click here to follow the Waltham Forest Guardian on Twitter

Comments(7)

Techno3 says...
8:46am Thu 21 Jun 12

Simon Moore's, for some reason probably only understood by the 'progressives' among us, is a metric ASBO.

As drawn up, it originally said 100 yards but for some reason the judge changed the restriction to 100 meters, thus increasing the distance he needs to keep away from the Olympics by a whole 9 yards, (and an additional 8 and two-thirds of an inch).

ruby newbie says...
9:34am Thu 21 Jun 12

good for you leyton marsh group,hope its very reavealing......you should see what could have happened,,,just like poor old Hainault Forest at the moment,its being ruined beyond belief.only wished locals here were as passionate as you are.........those in authority realy shouldnt be.....

ShinySue says...
10:32am Thu 21 Jun 12

What a holy waste of time this is, have these people nothing better to do with their time. Just trouble making agitators, I hope they dont get protective costs.

hatemordor says...
3:02pm Thu 21 Jun 12

No, we don't, we have nothing better to do with our time than try and protect our environment for future generations. Many of us have made sacrifices, including financially, and in Simon's case, he has been landed with a severe infringement of his human rights. It is the ODA that brought worse than trouble to Leyton Marsh; they brought destruction and hazard. We brought peaceful opposition to that and we are proud to continue to do so.

Sam Hain says...
11:14am Fri 22 Jun 12

What is the role of the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority in all this? More to the point, what is the role of Waltham Forest's appointee to thier Board, Cllr Bob Sullivan? Cllr Sullivan is Leader of the Lib Dem rump of sic councillors (himself included) so his role is hardly democratically accountable. How much does he get paid for attending, what is his attendance record, what has his input been and who mandates what he says at these meetings? Does he follow a council-agreed policy or is he a loose cannon. Anyone now the answers?

Sam Hain says...
11:16am Fri 22 Jun 12

PS: Oh dear, the typos! Ah well, sic councillors is actually quite good, as in councillors (sic)!

myopinioncounts says...
8:23am Tue 26 Jun 12

I wonder how many people would have 'backed the bid' for the Olympics if they had been made aware of the huge cost and disruption the games would bring? It would be interesting to know how many did actually phone the 'back the bid' number that was displayed on buses and elsewhere? There was not a number for those opposed to the games to lodge their objection. Democracy at work I think!

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree