Where I Live RSS Feed


Family Mosaic has defended its plans to knock down four 1930s period homes to build nearly 50 flats.


A DEVELOPER has defended its plans to knock down four 1930s homes and build a large block of flats.

L and C London and Family Mosaic hope to create 46 flats and 30 car parking spaces in Kings Head Hill, Chingford.

But people living nearby have criticised the design and local councillors oppose the application.

Residents are concerned that the new flats would be out of keeping with other properties, do not cater for families, would invade their privacy and create traffic problems.

A Family Mosaic spokeswoman said: “The area is characterised by a vast mix of houses and styles with a significant number of apartment blocks.

“There is an adjoining site, Homebush House, which is a three storey apartment block built in the 1980s. We believe our design is a vast improvement in style to this particular building. In our discussions with the local planning officers we have have been asked to reflect a more contemporary design.”

She added: “Our designs fall within current planning requirements in terms of the scale of development and proximity to neighbouring properties. Eight of the 46 units will be three bedroomed or more. The two bedroom units will also be available for smaller families.”

Responding to the concerns about traffic, she said: “We have consulted with the Highways Department within the council whilst developing our proposals and these meet the Highways Department's requirements.”

She continued: “What we would like to say is that Family Mosaic is a significant developing registered social landlord.

“Our developments, including Kings Head Hill, are carried out to a very high standard in terms of quality of build, space standards and in sustainable construction – which reduces the impact on the environment.

“This scheme will provide a fantastic opportunity for local people to access great quality affordable housing in an area that traditionally lacks such a provision.”

Those wishing to comment on the plans have 21 days to submit their points of view from June 21.

If you want to view the plans or say what you think contact Development Management, Sycamore House, Town Hall Complex, Forest Road, Walthamstow, E17 4JF.

The reception is open between 9am and 5pm Monday to Friday.

Comments(6)

DADRA says...
6:00pm Thu 9 Jul 09

To say that local residents have 'critcised' the design is the least of their concerns. A massive four storey block towering over residential properties, some of which are bungalows, is totally out of character with the area. The 'Block' extends almost to the boundaries cutting out residents light and privacy. The whole 'Fortified' look really must be stopped. It's a total eyesore in a previously pleasant residential area.

The Stowaway says...
9:45pm Thu 9 Jul 09

If the council do knock back their plans they will go to appeal and get it passed anyway, firms like these don't buy sites without knowing exactly what they can get away with building on them.

Redfox says...
10:28pm Thu 9 Jul 09

S-away forgets to point out the developers are always being advised off-the-record, what the council planning officers will - let them get away with. For a start being told to include a bit of cycle storage, even if it stays unused and worthless creates bonus points, as does 25% of car parking spaces allocated to disabled badge holders.
Just look at the re-development along The Ridgeway to see what the no-nothing planning officers will allow to get the green light.

Techno2 says...
10:32am Fri 10 Jul 09

Redfox wrote:
S-away forgets to point out the developers are always being advised off-the-record, what the council planning officers will - let them get away with. For a start being told to include a bit of cycle storage, even if it stays unused and worthless creates bonus points, as does 25% of car parking spaces allocated to disabled badge holders. Just look at the re-development along The Ridgeway to see what the no-nothing planning officers will allow to get the green light.
Why do you think our planning officers have such a track record of being so apparently pliable?

DADRA says...
11:12am Fri 10 Jul 09

I was concerned tht this article mainly dealt with Family Mosaics' response and seemed to care little for local residents objections.I have since found, by trawling through the Guardian website, that an article timed at 8:38am Tuesday 7 July gives our side of the story. Worth a read but difficult to find. I am shocked that Mosaic state that the Planning Officers asked for a 'More Contemporary Design'... . in a 1930's Residential Area????????

mdj says...
1:32pm Fri 10 Jul 09

To repeat what I've said elsewhere, the Council has agreed with central government, in return for a pitiful amount of extra money for infrastructure, to plan for an extra 20,000 inhabitants over the next (I think, please correct me somebody) five years. This makes it almost impossible to refuse any application for extra housing, regardless of the fact that those 20,000 may already be living here unofficially, uncounted. This is what that big bogus 'consultation' exercise about the Borough In 20 Years Time was all about, a year or two back: someone has used it to claim that more population is what we've asked for, and fast-tracked their career in the process. No prizes for guessing who. Local employment,local shopping parades, low rise housing, open space,will all go, forcing more commuters on to the 19th century road system: it contradicts all green ideas about local working and shopping, turning communities into dormitories. The Council was recently offering volunteer families £100 to visit 'high density' housing developments elsewhere in London to see what they thought of them. This means that high density is what we're in for, whether we want it or not, just as the last Beaumont block from the 60's is coming down. What's especially worrying is that the space standards allowed in the private sector are actually worse than the old Parker Morris rules for public housing, so it won't just be more housing, but worse.The Hawker Siddeley development is what the future will be like.The Planning Dept is kept understaffed in any case, which is why so many unlicensed developments are going on all over the Borough. Did you vote for this? Did your Councillor? Ask them.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses