Where I Live RSS Feed


Gravesend pair Dean Oakley and Natasha Murphy sentenced after kitten's neck was broken

Gravesend man sentenced for killing kitten by breaking its neck Gravesend man sentenced for killing kitten by breaking its neck

A GRAVESEND man has been banned from keeping animals for two years after he killed a kitten by breaking its neck.

Dean Oakley, of Doria Drive, and Natasha Murphy, of Princes Road, Gravesend, were sentenced at Dartford Magistrates' Court on Thursday (February 2).

Oakley, 35, pleaded guilty to failing in his duty as the person responsible for the welfare of animals after he killed the animal by twisting its neck.

Meanwhile, 28-year-old Murphy pleaded guilty to two counts of the same charge for not protecting her cats from a flea infestation and failing to provide adequate flea control.

Magistrates heard that in July last year Murphy's cat had five kittens but two died of natural causes.

Andrew Wiles, prosecuting, said: "The bodies had been found in an alley way at the rear of her property.

"She said she had put them out there because she believed the foxes would eat them."

Another kitten was ill so Murphy asked Oakley to "put it out of its misery", which he did by twisting its neck once and left it in the alley.

During a police interview Murphy said: "I thought I was in the right. I was in my own home. Mr Oakley was just putting the kitten out of its misery."

Oakley told officers: "It died straight away. I thought it was the best thing to do."

Mr Wiles read out a vet's statement, which said: "Breaking a kitten's neck is not generally considered an acceptable method of killing it due to the strength and thickness of the neck.

"There is potential to cause suffering."

Gurnam Mander, defending, told magistrates this was an "isolated incident" as Murphy had looked after cats since she was a young girl without any problems.

Mr Mander said: "She realises now what she should have done is phoned the RSPCA and sought advice as far as treatment is concerned."

RSPCA officers were alerted to the bodies and removed an adult tabby cat and a kitten from Murphy's house.

The tabby had a bald patch on its abdomen, which was infected and covered in fleas, while the kitten had developed anaemia due to a flea infestation.

Murphy told officers she did not believe the two-week old kittens were old enough to have flea treatment and denied seeing any fleas on the animals.

Both Murphy and Oakley were given a 24-month conditional discharge and disqualified from keeping animals for two years.

Murphy was ordered to pay prosecution costs of £600 and had her remaining cats seized by the RSPCA.

Oakley must also pay prosecution costs of £300.

An RSPCA spokeswoman told News Shopper: "Nobody should attempt to put an animal to sleep unless they are qualified to do so in a kind and humane way, such as a vet.

"The owner should have got treatment for the adult cat. If the adult cat had not been infested with fleas the kitten would have been fine."

Injuring or killing animals

Under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 pet owners have a 'duty of care' to provide for their animals' basic needs, such as adequate food and water, veterinary treatment and an appropriate environment in which to live.

With regards to wild animals, wildlife crime officer PC John Blackman explained: "Wild animals are covered by the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.

"You can't show cruelty to a wild animal. Some can come under the heading of a pest for example a fox, rabbit or magpie.

"That doesn't mean you can go and kill one, unless you have a licence from DEFRA."

Comments(6)

rayna53 says...
8:22am Wed 8 Feb 12

these two idiots should be banned for life..there are people out there that would care for the kittens, give them a decent way of death if that is what as necessary, not leave them in the alley for foxes to eat. hope someone does the same for them when it is their time to go.

Citygirl83 says...
8:37am Wed 8 Feb 12

I echo what rayna53 has said, they should be banned for life.
Those poor kittens didn't deserve that, had they spayed their animal they wouldn't have had the kittens saving a lot of hassle as they no doubt saw it. Or is it a case of breeding their cats to sell on the kittens.
Either way this so wrong. People who harm animals are on the same par with people who harm children in my book, maybe thats because I am such an animal lover but any form of animal cruelty makes me sick to my stomach.

TheEverardedbutt says...
9:34am Wed 8 Feb 12

Why is there a banner warning readers there might be some images that are upsetting and all you display are the kittens that look like they are sleeping yet on the article about the chickens there is no such warning but the story is littered with pictures of headless chickens?
http://www.newsshopp
er.co.uk/news/951636
6.Fourteen_chickens_
beheaded_in__evil_ma
ssacre_/?ref=mr
It appears you want us to have sympathy for some animals but not for others, it should be the same for all animals regardless whether they are in our food chain or not.

It appears to me that everyone cares about the fluffies and the furries but when it comes to feathers the rules seem to change (Atleast in some peoples eyes!)
Also the animal bans are usually very poorly enforced I have seen people banned from keeping dogs but within weeks of the judgement they are out with dogs again and when approached they claim the dog is someone elses leaving the authorities powerless to act.
Citygirl83 there is a proven link between animal cruelty/killings and serial killing of humans. Many serial killers started by killing animals and graduate up through bigger animals eventually going for the biggie and killing a person.

Citygirl83 says...
10:34am Wed 8 Feb 12

@TheEverardedbutt I am aware of that, you only have to look at the killers of Baby P to see that also, one of them killed animals, squirrels etc for fun. Just seems the world is becoming a much darker, nastier place and not one I am sure I would like to bring children into.

TheEverardedbutt says...
11:18am Wed 8 Feb 12

I'm amazed that they don't monitor people that are convicted of killing animals, given the over whelming evidence to suggest they will go on to kill again, gradually increasing the target size until they reach people.

the wall says...
12:18pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Anyone know what the percentage is of people that show cruelty to animals then go onto kill people ?
Instead of just repeating half understood theriors why don't people go and read up on it.

quote
“Murderers ... very often start out by killing and torturing animals as kids,” says Robert K. Ressler, who developed profiles of serial killers for the FBI.

Not everyone will be a madman killer.

I've shot birds / rabbits and go fishing yet have no intentions of kill humans........to messy to gut and they don't taste that good.


Anyway these dirty scumbags should of had a bigger fine and done some time.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree