Local London Logo
Where I Live
Barnet & Potters Bar
Bexley
Bishop's Stortford
Borehamwood
Bromley
Chigwell
Chingford
Croydon
Dartford & Gravesend
Ealing
Edgware
Elmbridge
Enfield
Epping Forest
Epsom
Harlow
Harrow
Hendon & Finchley
Hillingdon & Uxbridge
Hounslow & Chiswick
Kingston
Lewisham & Greenwich
Leyton
Loughton & Buckhurst Hill
Muswell Hill & Crouch End
Ongar
Redbridge
Richmond & Twickenham
South Bucks
Staines
St. Albans
Stratford
Streatham
Surrey
Sutton
Tottenham
Waltham Abbey
Waltham Forest
Wandsworth
Wanstead & Woodford
Watford
Wimbledon, Morden & Mitcham
Wood Green & Hornsey
Local Headlines
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Bishop's Stortford
EDITOR'S CHOICE
TOP STORIES
BEXLEY: Murder inquiry into mystery body in recycling
Boris boosts police numbers on buses
ENFIELD: Two more arrests in Ike Nmezu murder case
FEATURES
Health shake-up under spotlight
Family firm is well-bread
MAYOR NEWS
Boris boosts police numbers on buses
BIZARRE LONDON
TRAVEL
A giant 'no' to Heathrow
COMPETITIONS
Enter a world build for speed and win a Warner Bros. Pictures Speed Racer goody bag
VOTE
Do you think all police officers should be armed with stun guns?
Yes
No
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
STANSTED: Airport campaigners oppose flightpath proposals

CAMPAIGNERS fighting plans for a second runway at Stansted say flightpath changes proposed for the area will have a "profound effect" acrpss much of East Anglia.

The airspace changes proposed by NATS (National Air Traffic Services) arise from the changes proposed in the flightpaths and stacking holds not just for Stansted but also for Luton, Heathrow, Gatwick, Northolt and London City Airports.

NATS claim that the reason for these changes is the increase in air traffic.

Stop Stansted Expansion is opposed to the expansion of airport capacity on the grounds of unsustainability, and it is therefore opposed to any changes that are designed to accommodate unsustainable expansion.

The group recognises there would be winners and losers from different elements of the proposal. However, because of the great number of flights which they are designed to accommodate there would be far more losers overall.

A spokesman said: "This would be especially the case in rural East Anglia. This is because NATS defines noise impact by the number of people overflown rather than by the noise which they actually experience, with the result that tranquil rural areas would suffer disproportionately.

"It is partly as a result of this that the proposed changes would increase the route mileage flown for aircraft using Stansted. In effect the need to reduce fuel usage, carbon emissions and noise has been subordinated to NATS' main objectives of accommodating more flights and reducing delays for airlines."

1:16pm Tuesday 29th April 2008

Print   Email this
Archive
Local Search
Powered by Powered by Fish4
Use our news
Feed Local London headlines live to your site with RSS - free!
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network