Martin Taylor and Gianfranco Zola on defender's departure and why Watford couldn't offer him a two-year deal

Martin Taylor thanked Watford fans for their support following his departure to Sheffield Wednesday. Picture: Action Images Martin Taylor thanked Watford fans for their support following his departure to Sheffield Wednesday. Picture: Action Images

Martin Taylor is a model professional, is liked in the dressing room and has proved himself to be one of the best defenders in the Championship, so Watford’s decision to sell the player angered many supporters.

The fact Watford went on to lose 5-1 at Derby County the next day did not dampen the fans’ disappointment.

When the Hornets announced Taylor’s departure moments before the transfer window closed on Friday, the club stated the experienced defender was sold “following the player’s request to leave”.

But it is worth stating this was not an example of a player forcing through a move against the club’s wishes, although it is obvious Gianfranco Zola is indeed a big fan of the tall centre half and wanted him to stay.

The Watford Observer understands the Hornets initially welcomed the prospect of Taylor leaving the club and interested sides were told the player may be allowed to leave on a free transfer.

Sheffield Wednesday, and a host of other clubs, were first made aware of Taylor’s possible availability more than a month ago but since then, the player proved he could suit Zola’s new style of play and with John Eustace out injured, captained the team on several occasions this season.

Watford subsequently told interested clubs that the price had risen substantially and in the end, the player was sold for an undisclosed fee, which we understand is in the region of £100,000.

Taylor spoke exclusively to the Watford Observer this week and admitted he was keen to move to Hillsborough and stated a few reasons why.

But this certainly wasn’t a situation similar to Mike Williamson ’s move three years ago, where the Newcastle United defender forced through his Watford departure, and Taylor, who is renowned for being a model professional, spoke fondly of the club and his time at Vicarage Road .

When asked about his desire to leave and whether a written request was submitted, Taylor replied: “I didn’t put in a written transfer request at all, I definitely didn’t do that. Obviously I talked to the manager [Zola] all the time about various things but whilst I really enjoyed my time at Watford, the opportunity at Sheffield Wednesday was an excellent one for me.”

Taylor signed a new one-year contract in May under former manager Sean Dyche. Watford have a policy of not handing older players longer contracts this early in the season, whereas Wednesday were offering the player a two-year deal.

Zola wanted Taylor to remain at the club but said he has to respect the player’s decision and the Hornets’ stance on contract extensions.

The Watford boss said: “The reason [Taylor left] is that he had the possibility to go to another club and have a longer contract, something that I believe the club [Watford] have made a statement on.

“They have a different policy on that and they couldn’t give him a contract right now even though we appreciated – myself and the club appreciated – Martin Taylor very much.

“But the policy of the club was that we couldn’t offer him a contract right now. So therefore Martin asked to leave and I certainly understand Martin’s reasons, although I know I’ve lost a good player.”

On the club’s contract policy, Zola explained: “I believe it relates to age. I believe the club has a policy of not offering longer contracts to players of a certain age at this stage of the season – and it is important to stress that it is at this stage of the season.

“This is the policy of the club right now so we have to respect that.”

Taylor stated the two-year contract was a factor in his decision to leave but added it wasn’t the only reason and said he hopes Wednesday will be able to challenge for a play-off place this season.

The defender said: “Obviously [a two-year contract] is an attractive thing. I understand Watford’s policy on that – for older players like myself, clubs don’t really like looking beyond 12 months.

“The two years came into consideration but it was not just that. Wednesday have a good chance of pushing on and they are a massive club so they were the main factors.”

Watford have signed seven players this summer who can play in defence and those at the club last season will find it increasingly difficult to secure time on the pitch.

Taylor does not believe it is of huge concern to the current squad though, and stressed most of the Watford players have been at clubs with big squads in the past.

He admits the influx of new signings was on his mind when it came to his decision to leave but claims it was not a major consideration.

When asked if the high number of new signings was a factor in his decision to leave, Taylor replied: “Yes. You always have to believe in your own ability and you like to think that if you have the jersey then you can keep it.

“But to be honest, it wasn’t too much of a consideration because that happens at football clubs all the time and you know managers can bring players in. So it is no different at Watford than it is anywhere else.

“So you’ve always got to be mindful of that and that is just part of being a professional.”

Sheffield Wednesday’s interest in Taylor stretches back more than a month but Zola was hopeful the defender would stay and had him pencilled in to start at Derby County on Saturday.

Zola said: “We knew there was a possibility of him leaving but personally I was hoping that he might stay. Unfortunately it wasn’t the case so he left just the day before the game.”

When asked what day Taylor had asked to leave, Zola replied: “I knew that there was a possibility he would leave a couple of days before. We knew Martin had a couple of teams looking at him and offering him a good contract.

“We really were hoping that we would be able to keep him but unfortunately it wasn’t the case and therefore we lost a very important player.”

Taylor has been one of the Championship’s most consistent defenders since his arrival from Birmingham City on a free transfer in January 2010.

The defender, who grew up in the North East of England, made 95 appearances for Watford and scored ten goals.

“I will definitely look back on my time at Watford fondly, I had a fantastic time,” Taylor said. “I came to play games in a good set up and it was a fantastic set up there; they have great facilities and infrastructure at the club.

“There are a lot of good people there who I will miss and I will try to stay in touch with them.

“I really enjoyed my time there and I’m sure I’ll look back in a few years time with immense fondness and will always enjoy going back there.”

Taylor, who is affectionately known as Tiny due to his size, was hugely popular among the coaching staff, fellow players and supporters.

When asked whether he had a goodbye message for the fans, Taylor replied: “I want to say thank you. I have always had incredible support from the fans and they have always been great to me.

“On the pitch it is noticeable when you get a good reception and things like that but also off the pitch, I have always had a good rapport with the supporters.

“When you are at Watford you do lots of things in the community and events like question-and-answer sessions. Everyone has always been very welcoming and I’ve always enjoyed meeting the fans. So I want to thank them for their support,” he added.

Comments(23)

watford1881 says...
10:39am Fri 7 Sep 12

Hope we can replace him quickly... Dicko is not the man....

Mickey Quinn, not so thin says...
10:50am Fri 7 Sep 12

Presumably we already have the replacements. Just a question of which GZ will turn to. Big boots to fill....literally !

peter10531089 says...
11:14am Fri 7 Sep 12

To say there is a policy in place and it must be respected is somewhat odd. Was the policy in place from the last regime? If so and if it is wrong then change it, if as stated they wanted to keep Tiny. I think they needed to do something because of the overall size of the squad and so the club let him go despite letting thompson and Bennett go out on loan, the apparent lack of fitness of many of the new arrivals and the fact that Taylor had shown better form and adaption to Zola's style of play.

Thanks Tiny you well get a great reception when you do come back for leaving the club with grace and dignity and performances and commitment whilst you were here.

GFZ - everyone is behind you, but please don't play Dickinson at CB (or anywhere else for my money) he has no awareness or composure.

Travelling Hornet says...
11:52am Fri 7 Sep 12

I think Zola will replace Taylor, by playing Neuton , Ekstrand and Chalobah as three centrebacks with Cassetti and Pudil as wing backs.

stevyweavy says...
12:51pm Fri 7 Sep 12

I don't really care who we play at the back as long as they can keep the ball out of the net better than any of our other previous combinations. It would be nice to see a defensive unit playing that knows what each other is doing and what they need to do to provide the correct cover for one another. That would be a novelty for Watford that we haven't seen for quite a few years - it would certainly make a change from having to score three goals to give us a good shout of at least a draw.

gloryhornet4 says...
1:17pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Policies have to be flexible. One of the best Championship defenders who scores at an alarming rate vs a 3.5 year contract for Ellington and 3 years for Vega. You back winners. Tiny would outperform and keep his place to age 35.

holtonian says...
1:46pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Tiny or not it would have made no difference at Derby they completely outplayed us in all departments. Maybe we may have defended set plays better with Tiny playing. There are bound to be more losses some heavy i suspect as there are some excellent sides in the championship.
But that was always going to be the case with such a huge transition. If we stand by our manager and owners i feel certain we will be a good side competing in the Premiership in a few years time. If it was to happen sooner great. Time will tell.

Ronny oh Ronny Ronny says...
2:51pm Fri 7 Sep 12

holtonian wrote:
Tiny or not it would have made no difference at Derby they completely outplayed us in all departments. Maybe we may have defended set plays better with Tiny playing. There are bound to be more losses some heavy i suspect as there are some excellent sides in the championship.
But that was always going to be the case with such a huge transition. If we stand by our manager and owners i feel certain we will be a good side competing in the Premiership in a few years time. If it was to happen sooner great. Time will tell.
We may have lost 2-1 but more than likely would have got a point and probably would have beaten a strong, workmanlike derby had tiny not gone.

Still, onwards and upwards, GFZ has 2 weeks to bed the new boys in and I'm sure we will hand out a few beatings like that before the end of the season.

Good luck tiny, a top professional!

WFC4ever says...
3:26pm Fri 7 Sep 12

It sounds like the club were prepared to let him go at first..maybe Taylor didn't feel "wanted"?

Holly68 says...
9:16pm Fri 7 Sep 12

I hear we made a number of players available for transfer out a month ago !

Yet Taylor was the only one wanted, so might prove hard to shed the rest

Hornet1970 says...
10:49pm Fri 7 Sep 12

Zola sounds like a puppet, mad mad mad decision. Why couldnt we give him a 2 yr deal????? policy crap excuse. I for one do not like all of these foreign loans coming in. Too many and a lot of average / unfit players.

I said it before, zola is not the answer

Martin Taylor top defender and great guy...good luck to you

tom-WFC says...
8:13am Sat 8 Sep 12

What a stupid contract policy we have! Let's just let all our quality and experienced players leave because we won't give them 2 years.

corbindallas says...
9:30am Sat 8 Sep 12

One minute he is free to go the next he is not and then when we want to keep him we don't because of policy, a policy that is either brand new or old and clearly is not reflective to what the team needs! Surely if you as a manager want to keep a player it is down to you and not a policy, we have seen how policies work at Arsenal and clearly it needs to be reviewed, Taylor is no blame in all of this and I wish him the best I am just sorry we have yet again bungled on stupid policy (Don Cowie) springs to mind.

garston 'orn says...
11:06am Sat 8 Sep 12

I respect taylor as a player and was outstanding this season, but last season he was unreliable, slow and a bit useless. He didn't even start. I would have like to see him play this season for us, but he's ageing and offering him a two year contract would have been crazy. He is not the best centre back in the chamionship and if he didnt play this season you guys wouldn't have given a flying football if he left. I don't see him starting over hall, ekstrand, neuton, nos, cassetti anyway.

And how watford1970 can call players who have greater achievements such as playing in the champions league AVERAGE confuses me , you've never seen them play and your writing them off. All of you need to calm down and support your team.

rousman 2 says...
1:27pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Hornet1970 wrote:
Zola sounds like a puppet, mad mad mad decision. Why couldnt we give him a 2 yr deal????? policy crap excuse. I for one do not like all of these foreign loans coming in. Too many and a lot of average / unfit players.

I said it before, zola is not the answer

Martin Taylor top defender and great guy...good luck to you
Since when have we had this policy ? We only taking about another year. Age does not come into this you should judge this on how good the player is. There are not many clubs in the Champioship who would not have signed him. As I have said B4 Zola has very little say in who comes & goes.

Travelling Hornet says...
8:30pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Hornet1970 wrote:
Zola sounds like a puppet, mad mad mad decision. Why couldnt we give him a 2 yr deal????? policy crap excuse. I for one do not like all of these foreign loans coming in. Too many and a lot of average / unfit players.

I said it before, zola is not the answer

Martin Taylor top defender and great guy...good luck to you
Just watch these 'unfit,average' foreign players play the kind of football ,under GFZ coaching that will surprise and delight you.
Taylor was good at what he does but a bit of a dinosaur to the style of football we WILL be playing.
We need to off load a lot more of our old players , the timing might of been crap, but he had to go.

tommy gunn says...
2:13pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Maybe the selling of Taylor may come back to haunt us.Usually a good team is built around its spine,we have a decent keeper and had a good central defensive pair in Tiny and Nos.Yes it is nice on the eye to play a passing game and I for one welcome that approach,but you do need abit of 'steel' in this division.On paper we have plenty of cover for the ch position but has anyone seen them play in a competitive game? I just wonder.Remember,Patr
ick Blondeau was a France International before he came to us!

Travelling Hornet says...
6:19pm Sun 9 Sep 12

I've seen Neuton play, he certainly has steel in his game, similar to Robbo, but can dribble out of defence and play the killer ball as well as a perchant for the sliding tackle!!

Paul Gadd says...
8:45pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Good luck Tiny- apart from games against us of course- a quality signing for us

Forza Golduzzi!

miked2006 says...
9:44pm Sun 9 Sep 12

This is a European style of management. Zola is more of a head coach than an old school British manager. He has an upstairs team in charge of getting rid of and bringing players in (e.g. Nani) and he has other backroom staff to help him with tactics. Zola's main role is actually to befriend the players, blend them in and get them to play attractive football as a team. This task is of course a lot harder with such a huge squad and should be cut accordingly. But Zola will show his worth later in the season: when we have quality players, sharp and fully blended in, playing the excellent football that he desires. We are unlikely to go up this season: this style of football requires time and as we saw last weekend, we are in an unforgiving league. And there will probably be a few more thrashings along the way. But it will come. And when it does, it will be the best thing that has ever happened to our club.

Chris the Vic says...
8:39am Mon 10 Sep 12

Garston!!!!!!!!!!

Last year I distinctly remember Tiny being injured and Nyron coming in, then Nyron lost form and Mariappa got injured. Tiny reentered the team and with Nyron proceeded along with Tamas to send us on a very impressive run of form. Adrian came on as a sub and got sent off.
Tiny was a key player so slow and a bit useless?? who were you watching?

endean2 says...
8:54am Mon 10 Sep 12

Sorry but that is a very BAD BAD
DECISION

it cannot be a monentary decision as the sums do not make sense.
Surely pay him the right salary and give him a 2 year contract, reduce the size of the squad which would more than couver this figure.

This is in my opinion a very bad move from the new team and will
come back to haunt us

Has anybody seen Fitz Hall, does he even exist?

Bringe says...
11:19pm Tue 2 Oct 12

Foresteri slips over and gets his marching orders but yet again our players are deliberately kicked while still on the ground, right under the gaze of the card happy referee and the culprit goes completely unpunished!
... Premiership referee my-arse, just another homer, scared to upset the crowd, either that or he must be well cheesed off that his bets haven't come in.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree