Matej Vydra and Joel Ekstrand on target as Watford beat Derby County to go second in Championship
5:07pm Saturday 23rd February 2013 in Latest Sport
Watford sit second in the Championship tonight after Matej Vydra’s 20th league goal of the season and Joel Ekstrand's first for the Hornets helped them battle to a 2-1 victory over Derby County at Vicarage Road.
Alex Geijo, Ekstrand and Ikechi Anya could, and probably should, have put Watford at least a goal in front before Vyrdra showed them how it should be done with an exquisite finish to make it 1-0 after 35 minutes.
It looked the Hornets had made the game safe midway through the second half when Ekstrand bundled in an Almen Abdi corner to score his first goal in yellow after Manuel Almunia had been forced off through injury at the end of the first period.
Although Jamie Ward halved the deficit from the penalty spot five minutes later, Gianfranco Zola’s men held on for the three points on a day when promotion rivals Hull City and Crystal Palace were both beaten and Leicester City could only draw.
It wasn’t particularly pretty at times, but the Hornets once again showed the ability to grind it and leave their automatic promotion fate in their own hands with 12 games to go as they closed the gap to five points on leaders Cardiff City.
Like for the 2-0 win at Ipswich Town on Tuesday night, Zola opted to make three changes as his side sought to go through a calendar month unbeaten for the first time this season.
Cristian Battocchio came in for Jonathan Hogg in midfield, Vydra returned for Fernando Forestieri, while Geijo started a game for the first time since the 2-0 defeat at Bristol City as Troy Deeney was rested to the bench. This meant the Hornets strikers started a match together for the first time since the 6-1 victory at Leeds United in November.
Nigel Clough made just the one change to the side that drew 1-1 against Bolton Wanderers last time out, with Ben Davies replacing Kieron Freeman at right-back.
The Hornets were quickly out of the traps and missed a great opportunity to take the lead in the sixth minute. Vydra showed superb strength and tenacity to get in between the Rams’ central defensive pairing of Richard Keogh and John Brayford and squeeze in a shot which keeper Adam Legzdins was quickly off his line to block. However, the ball ran to Geijo on the edge of the area and he tried to steer it into the unguarded net with a cushioned right-footed half-volley, only to slice it wide.
Another chance came the hosts’ way soon after when Anya’s cross from the left reached Marco Cassetti on the opposite side of the area and he struck a powerful shot which the keeper managed to parry out to safety.
Derby had been on the back foot in their opening stages but they carved out their first opening in the tenth minute when Jeff Hendrick found Ward on the right side of the area and he came back inside on his left foot before curling a shot wide of Almunia’s right-hand post.
It took a superb challenge from Keogh to prevent Vydra having a clear run on goal after almost being picked out by Geijo’s pass. The Hornets then got a little sloppy though, and were perhaps fortunate not to be punished when a Michael Jacobs shot was partially blocked and almost broke to one of three unmarked team-mates but Almunia was able to save.
After the game had gone through a quiet spell, Anya injected some life into it when he showed superb skill down the left, including a lovely flick over his own head, to break into the area. Although he was unable to pick a team-mate out with his low centre, Watford kept the attack going, which reached its next stage with Geijo setting up Vydra for a right-footed strike which was deflected behind. Almen Abdi took the set-piece from the right and his delivery was allowed to bounce in the area and run to Ekstrand who, from six yards out, blasted horribly over the top when he should at least have hit the target.
That was a bad miss by the hosts and another one was to follow in the 33rd minute. It started when Geijo received the ball near halfway with his back to goal, he turned it around the corner to Vydra, who managed to get in ahead of the Derby backline and then sprinted clear. It was perhaps a surprise the Hornets top scorer did not go it alone but he unselfishly squared to Anya, who contrived to miss a largely unguarded net from six yards out.
The Hornets had not been playing that well but could quite easily have been 3-0 up. But they were not to be so wasteful with their next opportunity in the 35th minute when the home side’s striking ace reached a significant landmark.
Again Geijo was the creator, again finding Vydra, who sprinted clear from around 40 yards out before hitting a lovely low right-footed finish from 18 yards which rebounded off the inside of Legzdins’ near post and rolled across the line before nestling in the opposite corner of the net to make it 1-0 with his 20th league goal of the campaign.
Having taken the lead, the Hornets suffered a serious blow two minutes before the break when Nyron Nosworthy played his keeper into trouble near the right side of the penalty and after tangling with Ward, Almunia went down holding his left hamstring. The former Arsenal stopper tried to continue after receiving treatment but after catching one ball, he immediately threw it into touch and signalled to the bench that he could not continue.
Jonathan Bond came on and was soon involved in the action, making a confidence-boosting solid save to hold on to Craig Bryson’s effort from the right side of the area.
Ben Davies became the first player to be booked in first-half stoppage time after scything down Vydra. Abdi’s resultant free-kick from left of centre around 22 yards couldn’t beat the wall but the ball broke for Anya, whose right-footed strike from the edge of the area was fumbled back into the box by Legzdins before the ball was hacked to safety.
Clough made a double change at the start of the second half, with Jake Buxton coming on for Michael Hoganson and new signing Chris Martin replacing Jacobs.
Conor Sammon hit an early shot wide after the restart and then Bryson saw an effort blocked around five minutes later as the Hornets found attacking opportunities hard to come by in the early stages after the resumption.
Watford’s first effort of the second period came in the 56th minute when, following a throw-in from the left, a Geijo back heel released Abdi on the left side of the area and he tried to catch Legzdins out with a toe-poke towards the near post but the keeper was not deceived.
Ward then saw yellow after leaving Anya in heap but as the half progressed, the Hornets were still struggling to get going and while not living dangerously, they weren’t making the game too comfortable for themselves either. But that looked like it had all changed in the 68th minute.
Cassetti tried an ambitious shot from a tight angle on the right side of the area following a deep Vydra cross which was deflected behind. Abdi took the set piece from the right and Ekstrand went to connect with his head, the ball appeared to strike his chest but it was still enough to take it past Legzdins and make it 2-0.
Within five minutes though, Derby were given hope when referee Mark Haywood awarded them what looked a soft penalty for an apparent push at a corner but Ward made no mistake, slamming the shot down the centre of the goal to bring it back to 2-1.
Just prior to that goal, Mason Bennett had replaced Sammon and then after the spot-kick Zola made his first change as Hogg came on for Geijo.
The Hornets could have made the points safe with 11 minutes left when Anya was sent racing clear on the left but he failed to pick out Vydra after squaring across the area. However, Vydra managed to win it back and after poleaxing Keogh with one shot, Battocchio then tried a curler from the edge of the box which wasn’t too far wide.
By the same token though, Derby were inches away from levelling when Ward slid in and only just failed to connect in the six-yard box with a Paul Coutts delivery which was fizzed in low from the right.
Watford wasted another great counter-attacking opportunity with three minutes remaining when Abdi sent Hogg away into space down the left, he squared for Vydra, but the Czech international’s first touch was poor and the chance went begging.
Vydra was replaced by Deeney for the closing stages but the Hornets were able to play most of the three minutes of injury time in the opposition half to make it three wins in succession and 13 points out of a possible 15 in a very successful February.
Watford: Almunia (Bond 45); Doyley, Nosworthy, Ekstrand; Cassetti, Battocchio, Chalobah, Abdi, Anya; Geijo (Hogg 75), Vydra (Deeney 88). Not used: Yeates, Forsyth, Murray and Forestieri.
Derby County: Legzdins; Davies, Keogh, Brayford, Hoganson (Buxton 46); Coutts, Hendrick, Bryson, Jacobs (Martin 46); Ward, Sammon (Bennett 72). Not used: Fielding, Doyle, Gjokaj and Hanson.
Bookings: Davies for a foul on Vydra (45); Ward for a foul on Battocchio (57).
Attendance: 14,425 (929 away).
Referee: Mark Haywood.
More Pictures here
Comments(132)
Sahorn
says...
5:23pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Zola will keep everyones feet on the ground but its hard to contain the excitement at the moment -
now for Wolves to step up for the Cardiff slump tomorrow and I will be battling with a hangover ...
Sahorn
says...
5:23pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Zola will keep everyones feet on the ground but its hard to contain the excitement at the moment -
now for Wolves to step up for the Cardiff slump tomorrow and I will be battling with a hangover ...
Sahorn
says...
5:24pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Zola will keep everyones feet on the ground but its hard to contain the excitement at the moment -
now for Wolves to step up for the Cardiff slump tomorrow and I will be battling with a hangover ...
Retlas
says...
5:33pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Instead of Swindon read Cardiff.
Retlas
says...
5:33pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Instead of Swindon read Cardiff.
CARDIFFHORN
says...
5:35pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Retlas wrote:For Barry Endean read M. Vydra, that game at the County ground is in my top five favourite games.
If anyone remembers 68-69, this run in will be as exciting. Great stuff!
Instead of Swindon read Cardiff.
Retlas
says...
5:39pm Sat 23 Feb 13
abbotshornet
says...
5:44pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Sounded like yet another dodgy referee?
Another game where we could not keep the ball for long spells.
But despite all that we are now second and hot on the heals of Cardiff!
Come on Watford, we can do it, hold our nerve while others are losing their's and we can go up, it's in our own hands, this squad can only get better. COYH
a1derek
says...
5:48pm Sat 23 Feb 13
CARDIFFHORN
says...
5:56pm Sat 23 Feb 13
sussex hornet
says...
5:57pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Poppet Bear
says...
6:15pm Sat 23 Feb 13
abbotshornet
says...
6:15pm Sat 23 Feb 13
abbotshornet
says...
6:16pm Sat 23 Feb 13
peter10531089
says...
6:28pm Sat 23 Feb 13
buckler
says...
6:33pm Sat 23 Feb 13
oxheypaul
says...
6:35pm Sat 23 Feb 13
I presume Holloway is now moaning bout Sheffield Weds....
JohnnyHornet
says...
6:35pm Sat 23 Feb 13
allgood
says...
6:36pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Travelling Hornet
says...
6:38pm Sat 23 Feb 13
CARDIFFHORN wrote:I was there with my Dad.
Retlas wrote:For Barry Endean read M. Vydra, that game at the County ground is in my top five favourite games.
If anyone remembers 68-69, this run in will be as exciting. Great stuff!
Instead of Swindon read Cardiff.
As for today ,great result , important to win these games, I had a bad feeling about this one.
Midfield never got going , looked like our man Almen was carrying a hamstring injury and was obviously tired.
Well ground out result in the end.
We are going up,
KeithMercer
says...
6:46pm Sat 23 Feb 13
The STRIPEY NIGELS lose one player (zaha) and they scuppered !
The cream is rising to the top ! keep the Wolves front line quiet and it will be the same outcome but lets not take them for granted. They might just do us a favor tomorrow against Fatty Mctosh and his hornet rejects .
lutondown
says...
7:02pm Sat 23 Feb 13
We are going up!
JohnnyHornet
says...
7:09pm Sat 23 Feb 13
KeithMercer wrote:FFS, Bet Hollowhead blames us.
This is our great squad that is letting us grind out results when we are not at our brilliant best.
The STRIPEY NIGELS lose one player (zaha) and they scuppered !
The cream is rising to the top ! keep the Wolves front line quiet and it will be the same outcome but lets not take them for granted. They might just do us a favor tomorrow against Fatty Mctosh and his hornet rejects .
WessexLad
says...
7:14pm Sat 23 Feb 13
peter10531089 wrote:Exactly, The 3-6-1 formation just invited trouble. Geijo should have been replaced by Deeney. Instead our most successful pairing wasn't given a chance. Then, instead of Hogg, move Cassetti inside to replace Battochio with Forsyth as the wing back.
Just seen pen on sky and their player pushed their other player. Ref was very poor but I didn't enjoy Zola changing to 3-6-1 formation we had no opportunity to play the ball out and up so kept giving it back to them but they didn't really trouble our goal. I would love to sign their no 7 Coutts thought he was class but no one is on the same level as Chalobah!
Still, great result. After an indifferent start when the players were still getting to know each other, we have moved steadily up the table. Only one more mountain to climb! COYH!
lutondown
says...
7:17pm Sat 23 Feb 13
You Horns
Marcofan
says...
7:33pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Guy Bov
says...
7:41pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Each game a cup final .... exciting times ahead
Henry VIII
says...
7:43pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet
says...
7:46pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Retlas wrote:Yes, I do. But we won the league that year despite being well on top for the last third of the season and losing the last 3 games.
If anyone remembers 68-69, this run in will be as exciting. Great stuff!
Instead of Swindon read Cardiff.
Still, I think we have a good chance of staying in 2nd now and perhaps even 1st place. Really classy football today, the like of which I don't think I remember seeing at Watford. In terms of who deserved to win, it was us all the way through but the last 10 minutes were very uncomfortable and we could have ended up drawing. And it shouldn't have been like that because from where I was sitting, that was never a penalty. It enabled Derby to have the upper hand late on.
But 3 more pts are in the bag and looking at the next few games, we COULD usurp Cardiff before we even play them. I think we'll all be Wolves supporters tomorrow.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
7:48pm Sat 23 Feb 13
sussex hornet wrote:"Sussexhornet"? Specify - East or West? Results like like always make the trip home so much more tolerable!
Just on way back from game. Not our best performance. But we're solid enough, the ref had a shocker. They should of been down to 10 men and that was no way a pen. But on the plus side were up to second!!! Coyh
CARDIFFHORN
says...
7:56pm Sat 23 Feb 13
hornet88
says...
7:57pm Sat 23 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:And its uuuuuudiiiinese, uuuuudinese b, were by far the greatest team, in the pozzo family!
: We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want! You Horns
Eastsussexhornet
says...
7:59pm Sat 23 Feb 13
CARDIFFHORN wrote:Don't know but it hardly matters. Never understood how a goalie can be an effective captain.
Who took over on the captaincy after Aluminia's injury??
lutondown
says...
8:04pm Sat 23 Feb 13
hornet88 wrote:Good day 88. You and your bud are booked up. Money in next home game if ok. Keep them songs coming.
lutondown wrote:And its uuuuuudiiiinese, uuuuudinese b, were by far the greatest team, in the pozzo family!
: We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want! You Horns
57 people will sing them. Mong free bus
Holly68
says...
8:04pm Sat 23 Feb 13
CARDIFFHORN wrote:Nosworthy
Who took over on the captaincy after Aluminia's injury??
Eastsussexhornet
says...
8:09pm Sat 23 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:LD, what do you exactly mean by your last sentence?
hornet88 wrote:Good day 88. You and your bud are booked up. Money in next home game if ok. Keep them songs coming.
lutondown wrote:And its uuuuuudiiiinese, uuuuudinese b, were by far the greatest team, in the pozzo family!
: We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want! You Horns
57 people will sing them. Mong free bus
lutondown
says...
8:12pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:It means you won't be on the bus
lutondown wrote:LD, what do you exactly mean by your last sentence?
hornet88 wrote:Good day 88. You and your bud are booked up. Money in next home game if ok. Keep them songs coming.
lutondown wrote:And its uuuuuudiiiinese, uuuuudinese b, were by far the greatest team, in the pozzo family!
: We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want! You Horns
57 people will sing them. Mong free bus
lutondown
says...
8:15pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:In fact i will elaborate for you.
lutondown wrote:LD, what do you exactly mean by your last sentence?
hornet88 wrote:Good day 88. You and your bud are booked up. Money in next home game if ok. Keep them songs coming.
lutondown wrote:And its uuuuuudiiiinese, uuuuudinese b, were by far the greatest team, in the pozzo family!
: We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want! You Horns
57 people will sing them. Mong free bus
It is a bus full of supporters that will be going to support the team, not afraid to be vocal. Passionate. That is what I mean. Oh and no blankets or flasks permitted, along with you!
Don't know why I'm responding o your order mind
lutondown
says...
8:20pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Holly68 wrote:He has been very good over last four games. a rock, along with our defence in general.
CARDIFFHORN wrote:Nosworthy
Who took over on the captaincy after Aluminia's injury??
If Almunia is out we surely need an emergency loan keeper? If for nothing else than cover for Bond
hornet88
says...
8:20pm Sat 23 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:I don't own a blanket or a flask LD so I'm alright. I will bring the Mahoney's week Tuesday.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:In fact i will elaborate for you. It is a bus full of supporters that will be going to support the team, not afraid to be vocal. Passionate. That is what I mean. Oh and no blankets or flasks permitted, along with you! Don't know why I'm responding o your order mindlutondown wrote:LD, what do you exactly mean by your last sentence?hornet88 wrote:Good day 88. You and your bud are booked up. Money in next home game if ok. Keep them songs coming. 57 people will sing them. Mong free buslutondown wrote: : We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want! You HornsAnd its uuuuuudiiiinese, uuuuudinese b, were by far the greatest team, in the pozzo family!
JohnnyHornet
says...
8:30pm Sat 23 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:FFS don't give the media idiots something else to whinge about.
Holly68 wrote:He has been very good over last four games. a rock, along with our defence in general.
CARDIFFHORN wrote:Nosworthy
Who took over on the captaincy after Aluminia's injury??
If Almunia is out we surely need an emergency loan keeper? If for nothing else than cover for Bond
lutondown
says...
8:33pm Sat 23 Feb 13
JohnnyHornet wrote:They will, so time to say it ourselves, sort if draws the sting..?
lutondown wrote:FFS don't give the media idiots something else to whinge about.
Holly68 wrote:He has been very good over last four games. a rock, along with our defence in general.
CARDIFFHORN wrote:Nosworthy
Who took over on the captaincy after Aluminia's injury??
If Almunia is out we surely need an emergency loan keeper? If for nothing else than cover for Bond
We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want!
It's being mooted we start buying UDI kits with B emblazoned on back! Great idea
JohnnyHornet
says...
8:40pm Sat 23 Feb 13
lutondown
says...
8:41pm Sat 23 Feb 13
JohnnyHornet wrote:They would sell like hot cakes! I'd buy one!
I saw 4 Peeps in the LRS earlier with what looked like Udun strips on, great idea, get the club to get them in so they make as well.
Stoney77
says...
8:48pm Sat 23 Feb 13
JohnnyHornet
says...
8:48pm Sat 23 Feb 13
JohnnyHornet
says...
8:49pm Sat 23 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:Just trying to get Jon Marks BBC 3CR to retweet it to his followers, he thinks it's a brilliant Idea
JohnnyHornet wrote:They would sell like hot cakes! I'd buy one!
I saw 4 Peeps in the LRS earlier with what looked like Udun strips on, great idea, get the club to get them in so they make as well.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
8:58pm Sat 23 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:That's a relief.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:It means you won't be on the bus
lutondown wrote:LD, what do you exactly mean by your last sentence?
hornet88 wrote:Good day 88. You and your bud are booked up. Money in next home game if ok. Keep them songs coming.
lutondown wrote:And its uuuuuudiiiinese, uuuuudinese b, were by far the greatest team, in the pozzo family!
: We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want! You Horns
57 people will sing them. Mong free bus
Bush Hornet
says...
8:59pm Sat 23 Feb 13
hornet88
says...
9:02pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet
says...
9:03pm Sat 23 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:Well apart from the fact that you have completely misjudged me, which I don't blame you for because I think I misjudged you a few weeks back, I am am not as far away from your outlook on life as you think. Just wanted to make sure that you didn't mean what I thought you might be. I am glad you didn't.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:In fact i will elaborate for you.
lutondown wrote:LD, what do you exactly mean by your last sentence?
hornet88 wrote:Good day 88. You and your bud are booked up. Money in next home game if ok. Keep them songs coming.
lutondown wrote:And its uuuuuudiiiinese, uuuuudinese b, were by far the greatest team, in the pozzo family!
: We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want! You Horns
57 people will sing them. Mong free bus
It is a bus full of supporters that will be going to support the team, not afraid to be vocal. Passionate. That is what I mean. Oh and no blankets or flasks permitted, along with you!
Don't know why I'm responding o your order mind
lutondown
says...
9:04pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:Chill fella. We won today, lets save the bickering for when we lose.
lutondown wrote:That's a relief.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:It means you won't be on the bus
lutondown wrote:LD, what do you exactly mean by your last sentence?
hornet88 wrote:Good day 88. You and your bud are booked up. Money in next home game if ok. Keep them songs coming.
lutondown wrote:And its uuuuuudiiiinese, uuuuudinese b, were by far the greatest team, in the pozzo family!
: We beat who we want..we beat who we want..we're Udi B team and we beat who we want! You Horns
57 people will sing them. Mong free bus
KeithMercer
says...
9:50pm Sat 23 Feb 13
JohnnyHornet wrote:Even better idea which would really sell is a Udinese top with a Watford badge on it ! This would look cool
lutondown wrote:Just trying to get Jon Marks BBC 3CR to retweet it to his followers, he thinks it's a brilliant Idea
JohnnyHornet wrote:They would sell like hot cakes! I'd buy one!
I saw 4 Peeps in the LRS earlier with what looked like Udun strips on, great idea, get the club to get them in so they make as well.
sussex hornet
says...
9:53pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:West!!!
sussex hornet wrote:"Sussexhornet"? Specify - East or West? Results like like always make the trip home so much more tolerable!
Just on way back from game. Not our best performance. But we're solid enough, the ref had a shocker. They should of been down to 10 men and that was no way a pen. But on the plus side were up to second!!! Coyh
Big Cliff was King
says...
9:53pm Sat 23 Feb 13
JohnnyHornet
says...
9:57pm Sat 23 Feb 13
/news/uk-england-215
55294
Paul Gadd
says...
9:58pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Great news teams around us slipped up...even if Leicester win games in hand, we still have more points!...and with our GD we outgun everyone!
And the scum lost.....happy days!!
COYH!!!
1234566789
says...
10:01pm Sat 23 Feb 13
hornet88 wrote:http://www.uksoccers
I looked at buying one at the beginning of the season but they are quite hard to come by as they sell them on European websites or they are quite expensive. If the club got hold of some I'd get one from them....surely they could make a but of money and still be cheaper for us. Pozzo....sort us out ;-)
hop.com/categories/2
_108.html
lutondown
says...
10:03pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Big Cliff was King wrote:No, mongrels I think. The comment has done the rounds for a while.
Am I missing something here ? Is there another meaning of the word 'mong' other than an unpleasant expression for people with Downs Syndrome. One or two on your bus wouldn't be too bad would it ?
And as it is our private bus we will choose who travels on it. Like said just fans wanting to support their teams.
Perhaps flask and rug brigade describe the undesirables better..flakes whatever
stewbyhorn
says...
10:17pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Same Saturday night reply, f¥#k right off! No chance, ain't it great that little old Watford are turning heads in the world of football. U orrrrrrrrrns!!
lutondown
says...
10:20pm Sat 23 Feb 13
stewbyhorn wrote:Why would they not want him? Mustard hotM
I've just had the Saturday night text from the lads in the office, all Tottenham fans out on the lash.........Vydra spelt veeeeeeeeeedraaaaaa, we want him!!!!
Same Saturday night reply, f¥#k right off! No chance, ain't it great that little old Watford are turning heads in the world of football. U orrrrrrrrrns!!
DAVE THE HORNET
says...
10:20pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Taxidermist
says...
10:30pm Sat 23 Feb 13
KeithMercer wrote:How about a shirt that is half Watford and half udinese?
JohnnyHornet wrote:Even better idea which would really sell is a Udinese top with a Watford badge on it ! This would look cool
lutondown wrote:Just trying to get Jon Marks BBC 3CR to retweet it to his followers, he thinks it's a brilliant Idea
JohnnyHornet wrote:They would sell like hot cakes! I'd buy one!
I saw 4 Peeps in the LRS earlier with what looked like Udun strips on, great idea, get the club to get them in so they make as well.
lutondown
says...
10:43pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Taxidermist wrote:I think when the bright spark who suggested a Udi shirt with B on back, he was suggesting it as our finger up to the general tripe that comes our way.
KeithMercer wrote:How about a shirt that is half Watford and half udinese?
JohnnyHornet wrote:Even better idea which would really sell is a Udinese top with a Watford badge on it ! This would look cool
lutondown wrote:Just trying to get Jon Marks BBC 3CR to retweet it to his followers, he thinks it's a brilliant Idea
JohnnyHornet wrote:They would sell like hot cakes! I'd buy one!
I saw 4 Peeps in the LRS earlier with what looked like Udun strips on, great idea, get the club to get them in so they make as well.
stewbyhorn
says...
10:59pm Sat 23 Feb 13
CARDIFFHORN
says...
11:00pm Sat 23 Feb 13
Sydneyhornet
says...
11:03pm Sat 23 Feb 13
DAVE THE HORNET wrote:Some paths are clearly mapped out.
hey Luton Down or whatever your sobriquet; you're a discriminatory man of the people and as such your views are the usual drivel one expects from the mainstream channel you live in; let's hope your private bus isn't on a one way journey to a life of futility and unfulfilled dreams. I quite like my flask of hot coffee.
Football, the great denominator amoungst men!
lutondown
says...
11:15pm Sat 23 Feb 13
DAVE THE HORNET wrote:Wish I knew what you meant. But do enjoy your coffee.
hey Luton Down or whatever your sobriquet; you're a discriminatory man of the people and as such your views are the usual drivel one expects from the mainstream channel you live in; let's hope your private bus isn't on a one way journey to a life of futility and unfulfilled dreams. I quite like my flask of hot coffee.
Henry VIII
says...
12:10am Sun 24 Feb 13
stewbyhorn
says...
12:24am Sun 24 Feb 13
Boosey
says...
6:21am Sun 24 Feb 13
Big Cliff was King wrote:I do believe he is referring to the type of supporter who taps you on the shoulder and asks you to refrain from standing up when the team are on the attack and are possibly about to score.
Am I missing something here ? Is there another meaning of the word 'mong' other than an unpleasant expression for people with Downs Syndrome. One or two on your bus wouldn't be too bad would it ?
The type of supporter who tries to curb the excitement of being a Watford supporter. The type who will moan just for the sake of moaning. This is the other meaning of the word mong!
SAHornet
says...
8:02am Sun 24 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:Beautifully restrained LD, well done !
DAVE THE HORNET wrote:Wish I knew what you meant. But do enjoy your coffee.
hey Luton Down or whatever your sobriquet; you're a discriminatory man of the people and as such your views are the usual drivel one expects from the mainstream channel you live in; let's hope your private bus isn't on a one way journey to a life of futility and unfulfilled dreams. I quite like my flask of hot coffee.
Shows how well we are perceived as doing, our game at Wolves will be televised live here in SA on Friday - that's the 3rd game this season - unheard of. Even those South African's who ask which team I support, now know who I'm talking about now when I say WFC. Up 'till now they've only heard of MUFC.
Traceyhornet
says...
8:05am Sun 24 Feb 13
Loved it at Birmingham when their fans were singing to us "where were you when you were s**t"? Remember us singing that to the Man City fans only a few weeks earlier.
Sydneyhornet
says...
9:19am Sun 24 Feb 13
Boosey wrote:There's only one meaning of the word.
Big Cliff was King wrote: Am I missing something here ? Is there another meaning of the word 'mong' other than an unpleasant expression for people with Downs Syndrome. One or two on your bus wouldn't be too bad would it ?I do believe he is referring to the type of supporter who taps you on the shoulder and asks you to refrain from standing up when the team are on the attack and are possibly about to score. The type of supporter who tries to curb the excitement of being a Watford supporter. The type who will moan just for the sake of moaning. This is the other meaning of the word mong!
I've happen to if been to many games of footy with a downs lad, a friend actually. Let me tell you he knows how to get behind a team. Sadly he's a hammer, but can tear it up when singing your forever blowing bubbles. At England games, he's the first to get into god save the queen.
So lets all just move on, the word Mong is a poor choice, if you knew people with downs you'd understand why. It's also a little offensive to us that have people with downs in our lives.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
9:34am Sun 24 Feb 13
Sydneyhornet wrote:I am totally behind you here. It is extremely offensive evn to those, like me, that don't have a connection as you have. As it happens, I don't think this is what is meant by those that use it on here so this needs to be kept in context but, as you say, a poor choice of words.
Boosey wrote:There's only one meaning of the word.
Big Cliff was King wrote: Am I missing something here ? Is there another meaning of the word 'mong' other than an unpleasant expression for people with Downs Syndrome. One or two on your bus wouldn't be too bad would it ?I do believe he is referring to the type of supporter who taps you on the shoulder and asks you to refrain from standing up when the team are on the attack and are possibly about to score. The type of supporter who tries to curb the excitement of being a Watford supporter. The type who will moan just for the sake of moaning. This is the other meaning of the word mong!
I've happen to if been to many games of footy with a downs lad, a friend actually. Let me tell you he knows how to get behind a team. Sadly he's a hammer, but can tear it up when singing your forever blowing bubbles. At England games, he's the first to get into god save the queen.
So lets all just move on, the word Mong is a poor choice, if you knew people with downs you'd understand why. It's also a little offensive to us that have people with downs in our lives.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
9:36am Sun 24 Feb 13
Sydneyhornet wrote:Never before has so much been said with so few words!
DAVE THE HORNET wrote:Some paths are clearly mapped out.
hey Luton Down or whatever your sobriquet; you're a discriminatory man of the people and as such your views are the usual drivel one expects from the mainstream channel you live in; let's hope your private bus isn't on a one way journey to a life of futility and unfulfilled dreams. I quite like my flask of hot coffee.
Football, the great denominator amoungst men!
Boosey
says...
10:04am Sun 24 Feb 13
Sydneyhornet wrote:Knowing LD as I do, I know he would never use that word in a manner that would upset someone and definately not towards a downs person.
Boosey wrote:There's only one meaning of the word.
Big Cliff was King wrote: Am I missing something here ? Is there another meaning of the word 'mong' other than an unpleasant expression for people with Downs Syndrome. One or two on your bus wouldn't be too bad would it ?I do believe he is referring to the type of supporter who taps you on the shoulder and asks you to refrain from standing up when the team are on the attack and are possibly about to score. The type of supporter who tries to curb the excitement of being a Watford supporter. The type who will moan just for the sake of moaning. This is the other meaning of the word mong!
I've happen to if been to many games of footy with a downs lad, a friend actually. Let me tell you he knows how to get behind a team. Sadly he's a hammer, but can tear it up when singing your forever blowing bubbles. At England games, he's the first to get into god save the queen.
So lets all just move on, the word Mong is a poor choice, if you knew people with downs you'd understand why. It's also a little offensive to us that have people with downs in our lives.
It's a word that was commonly used in school in the 70's and It's the first time I had heard It since.
Unfortunately some habits die hard and somewhere along the line we all upset someone in our time.
So please don't take offence because none was intended.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
10:12am Sun 24 Feb 13
Boosey wrote:Good response, appreciated, as I thought really but it's difficult to know for sure on here.
Sydneyhornet wrote:Knowing LD as I do, I know he would never use that word in a manner that would upset someone and definately not towards a downs person.
Boosey wrote:There's only one meaning of the word.
Big Cliff was King wrote: Am I missing something here ? Is there another meaning of the word 'mong' other than an unpleasant expression for people with Downs Syndrome. One or two on your bus wouldn't be too bad would it ?I do believe he is referring to the type of supporter who taps you on the shoulder and asks you to refrain from standing up when the team are on the attack and are possibly about to score. The type of supporter who tries to curb the excitement of being a Watford supporter. The type who will moan just for the sake of moaning. This is the other meaning of the word mong!
I've happen to if been to many games of footy with a downs lad, a friend actually. Let me tell you he knows how to get behind a team. Sadly he's a hammer, but can tear it up when singing your forever blowing bubbles. At England games, he's the first to get into god save the queen.
So lets all just move on, the word Mong is a poor choice, if you knew people with downs you'd understand why. It's also a little offensive to us that have people with downs in our lives.
It's a word that was commonly used in school in the 70's and It's the first time I had heard It since.
Unfortunately some habits die hard and somewhere along the line we all upset someone in our time.
So please don't take offence because none was intended.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
10:19am Sun 24 Feb 13
Holly68
says...
10:20am Sun 24 Feb 13
"A person who attends a football match and shows little passion or vocal support of his/her team"
And that is the context that it has been used on this website
It has no reference to sex, race, colour, creed, disability, ablility, age, weight, height, hair colour ....
SAHornet
says...
10:38am Sun 24 Feb 13
Holly68 wrote:Quite right Holly.
The Football definition of "Mong" is street word for following :
"A person who attends a football match and shows little passion or vocal support of his/her team"
And that is the context that it has been used on this website
It has no reference to sex, race, colour, creed, disability, ablility, age, weight, height, hair colour ....
FFS listen to yourselves. Man-up a bit. This ridiculous over-sensitivity and p c'ness is just another reason I left The UK when I did. Mind you, it's spreading all over the world. Beam me up Scotty !
mjobrien2
says...
10:52am Sun 24 Feb 13
A – Wolves – 1 point
H – Sheff Weds – 3 points
H – Blackpool – 1 point
A – Barnsley – 3 points
H – Burnley – 1 point
A – Hull – 0 points
H – Cardiff – 1 point *please let it be 3!!!
A – Peterborough – 3 points
A – Milwall – 1 point
H – Blackburn – 3 points
A – Leicester – 1 point
H – Leeds – 3 points
Boosey
says...
10:58am Sun 24 Feb 13
Holly68 wrote:Apart from ginger. . . .Only joking!
The Football definition of "Mong" is street word for following :
"A person who attends a football match and shows little passion or vocal support of his/her team"
And that is the context that it has been used on this website
It has no reference to sex, race, colour, creed, disability, ablility, age, weight, height, hair colour ....
Eastsussexhornet
says...
11:03am Sun 24 Feb 13
SAHornet wrote:And wherever it is you are, perhaps it's best you stay there then.
Holly68 wrote:Quite right Holly.
The Football definition of "Mong" is street word for following :
"A person who attends a football match and shows little passion or vocal support of his/her team"
And that is the context that it has been used on this website
It has no reference to sex, race, colour, creed, disability, ablility, age, weight, height, hair colour ....
FFS listen to yourselves. Man-up a bit. This ridiculous over-sensitivity and p c'ness is just another reason I left The UK when I did. Mind you, it's spreading all over the world. Beam me up Scotty !
Big Cliff was King
says...
11:09am Sun 24 Feb 13
Perhaps it is time to find a better one for those miserable people who don't like to get excited at a football match.
willia6692
says...
11:19am Sun 24 Feb 13
Big Cliff was King wrote:Boring, dull, Frustrating, Confusing.
Perhaps a word that requires an explanation every time it is used should not be used at all.
Perhaps it is time to find a better one for those miserable people who don't like to get excited at a football match.
lutondown
says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.
Big Cliff was King
says...
12:27pm Sun 24 Feb 13
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
lutondown
says...
12:35pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Big Cliff was King wrote:So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers.
lutondown says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose.
But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
Eastsussexhornet
says...
12:56pm Sun 24 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.
Big Cliff was King wrote:So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers.
lutondown says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose.
But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
Boosey
says...
2:57pm Sun 24 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:It was Elvis, LD, you and your infatuation with Cliff it's getting worse!
Big Cliff was King wrote: lutondown says... 11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13 Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion. As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68. As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied. I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about. Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.” We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers. Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose. But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
Harry's Bar
says...
3:27pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)
lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.
Big Cliff was King wrote:So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers.
lutondown says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose.
But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
Harry's Bar
says...
3:40pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I had the same line of vision as the referee. I saw a player go down out of the corner of my eye. I'm sure he did the same and just gave it. It's not clear on the FL show but why would Cassetti push a player to the ground off the ball like that?
Getting the discussion back onto the article, what actually happened to cause the ref to give them a penalty? I was in a fairly good position to see but saw nothing. None of the Derby players even claimed it. They seemed as surprised as our players.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
3:51pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Harry's Bar wrote:We had somehow got from ".....Watford beat Derby County to go second in Championship" to a discussion about social predujices but there probably weren't any in this case.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)
lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.
Big Cliff was King wrote:So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers.
lutondown says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose.
But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
Yes, I felt a bit uneasy about the cliques's tribal membership criteria but I thought I would gloss over that bearing in mind the potentially far more serious issue.
Each to their own - but let's just say, I can't think of anywhere I would want to be less than on that bus!
Eastsussexhornet
says...
3:53pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Harry's Bar wrote:I haven't seen it yet - give me 20 mins...
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I had the same line of vision as the referee. I saw a player go down out of the corner of my eye. I'm sure he did the same and just gave it. It's not clear on the FL show but why would Cassetti push a player to the ground off the ball like that?
Getting the discussion back onto the article, what actually happened to cause the ref to give them a penalty? I was in a fairly good position to see but saw nothing. None of the Derby players even claimed it. They seemed as surprised as our players.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
4:00pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:No, not clear. And, as you say, nowhere near the ball with at least 3 players all colliding at the same time. Strange that the ref could have been sure enough to award a penalty.
Harry's Bar wrote:I haven't seen it yet - give me 20 mins...
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I had the same line of vision as the referee. I saw a player go down out of the corner of my eye. I'm sure he did the same and just gave it. It's not clear on the FL show but why would Cassetti push a player to the ground off the ball like that?
Getting the discussion back onto the article, what actually happened to cause the ref to give them a penalty? I was in a fairly good position to see but saw nothing. None of the Derby players even claimed it. They seemed as surprised as our players.
lutondown
says...
4:57pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Harry's Bar wrote:No mate we will have on this bus who we please and they will be like minded.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)
lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.
Big Cliff was King wrote:So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers.
lutondown says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose.
But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
And the key is those on the bus will be supporting their side, not tutting away the afternoon.
Colour does not come into it and we are diverse as it happens, age certainly don't, drink is optional, but sitting there in mute silence is not. Ok?
We have enough people telling us how to think, we've chartered a bus, I think we can pick our guests.
lutondown
says...
4:58pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:Likewise
Harry's Bar wrote:We had somehow got from ".....Watford beat Derby County to go second in Championship" to a discussion about social predujices but there probably weren't any in this case.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)
lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.
Big Cliff was King wrote:So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers.
lutondown says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose.
But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
Yes, I felt a bit uneasy about the cliques's tribal membership criteria but I thought I would gloss over that bearing in mind the potentially far more serious issue.
Each to their own - but let's just say, I can't think of anywhere I would want to be less than on that bus!
Big Cliff was King
says...
5:06pm Sun 24 Feb 13
We are all on the same bus which is heading for glory.
lutondown
says...
5:09pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Boosey wrote:Ha ha, as in Holton you winkle picker wearing Elvis obsessive!
lutondown wrote:It was Elvis, LD, you and your infatuation with Cliff it's getting worse!
Big Cliff was King wrote: lutondown says... 11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13 Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion. As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68. As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied. I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about. Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.” We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers. Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose. But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
lutondown
says...
5:16pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Big Cliff was King wrote:I agree, about the glory,but ESH I think has enjoyed this and has cleverly prolonged the thread. And we are very obviously never going to be on the same bus, that I can safely say.
Enough !!!
We are all on the same bus which is heading for glory.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
6:12pm Sun 24 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:Once again LD, I agree with you!
Big Cliff was King wrote:I agree, about the glory,but ESH I think has enjoyed this and has cleverly prolonged the thread. And we are very obviously never going to be on the same bus, that I can safely say.
Enough !!!
We are all on the same bus which is heading for glory.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
6:22pm Sun 24 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:Harry's Bar, this is why I decided to leave it at that. Groups that try to defend themselves to this extent are obviously a bit insecure despite trying to portray the opposite. And you and I will run out of steam far quicker than they will.....like I just have.
Harry's Bar wrote:No mate we will have on this bus who we please and they will be like minded.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)
lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.
Big Cliff was King wrote:So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers.
lutondown says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose.
But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
And the key is those on the bus will be supporting their side, not tutting away the afternoon.
Colour does not come into it and we are diverse as it happens, age certainly don't, drink is optional, but sitting there in mute silence is not. Ok?
We have enough people telling us how to think, we've chartered a bus, I think we can pick our guests.
Boosey
says...
6:53pm Sun 24 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I am in th so called group and where down the line have I upset you? So go and practise safe sex!
lutondown wrote:Harry's Bar, this is why I decided to leave it at that. Groups that try to defend themselves to this extent are obviously a bit insecure despite trying to portray the opposite. And you and I will run out of steam far quicker than they will.....like I just have.Harry's Bar wrote:No mate we will have on this bus who we please and they will be like minded. And the key is those on the bus will be supporting their side, not tutting away the afternoon. Colour does not come into it and we are diverse as it happens, age certainly don't, drink is optional, but sitting there in mute silence is not. Ok? We have enough people telling us how to think, we've chartered a bus, I think we can pick our guests.Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.Big Cliff was King wrote: lutondown says... 11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13 Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion. As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68. As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied. I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about. Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.” We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers. Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose. But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
Harry's Bar
says...
7:42pm Sun 24 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:LD, of course you can pick who you want for your charter. I really meant "bus" in a wider sense. My point is that everyone will be supporting their side. Your bus, the flask and blanket set, the sweet chewing set, the transistor radio listeners, the carrier bag set, the silent types, the tutters. There's room for everyone.
Harry's Bar wrote:No mate we will have on this bus who we please and they will be like minded.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)
lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.
Big Cliff was King wrote:So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers.
lutondown says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose.
But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
And the key is those on the bus will be supporting their side, not tutting away the afternoon.
Colour does not come into it and we are diverse as it happens, age certainly don't, drink is optional, but sitting there in mute silence is not. Ok?
We have enough people telling us how to think, we've chartered a bus, I think we can pick our guests.
mk6 hornet
says...
8:30pm Sun 24 Feb 13
!!why would anyone want to wear an udinese top at watford i am sorry i upset anyone with this statement but we are watford football club just because we have the same owner it does not mean i want to see them shirts sold at our club.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
8:59am Mon 25 Feb 13
mk6 hornet wrote:Absolutely agree. I haven't the feintest idea why anyone would want to...
I cannot believe what i am hearing!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!why would anyone want to wear an udinese top at watford i am sorry i upset anyone with this statement but we are watford football club just because we have the same owner it does not mean i want to see them shirts sold at our club.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
9:01am Mon 25 Feb 13
Harry's Bar wrote:Well said. Somehow I thought that the only bus that LD thought you meant was the one with wheels on.
lutondown wrote:LD, of course you can pick who you want for your charter. I really meant "bus" in a wider sense. My point is that everyone will be supporting their side. Your bus, the flask and blanket set, the sweet chewing set, the transistor radio listeners, the carrier bag set, the silent types, the tutters. There's room for everyone.
Harry's Bar wrote:No mate we will have on this bus who we please and they will be like minded.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)
lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.
Big Cliff was King wrote:So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers.
lutondown says...
11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion.
As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68.
As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied.
I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about.
Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.”
We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.
Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose.
But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
And the key is those on the bus will be supporting their side, not tutting away the afternoon.
Colour does not come into it and we are diverse as it happens, age certainly don't, drink is optional, but sitting there in mute silence is not. Ok?
We have enough people telling us how to think, we've chartered a bus, I think we can pick our guests.
Eastsussexhornet
says...
9:12am Mon 25 Feb 13
Boosey wrote:I don't quite understand your post but in any case, no, you haven't upset anyone, certainly not me, and your post over the weekend was particularly good. I am not judging or criticising. But I agree with Harry's Bar - we're all enjoying this together - all types, all backgrounds, shapes and sizes. I don't like shouting and singing much (I do on occassions) because I am not that type of person. I am not apologising for this nor elevating myself. What I don't like is the suggestion that because of this I am not a "proper supporter". That's all.
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I am in th so called group and where down the line have I upset you? So go and practise safe sex!
lutondown wrote:Harry's Bar, this is why I decided to leave it at that. Groups that try to defend themselves to this extent are obviously a bit insecure despite trying to portray the opposite. And you and I will run out of steam far quicker than they will.....like I just have.Harry's Bar wrote:No mate we will have on this bus who we please and they will be like minded. And the key is those on the bus will be supporting their side, not tutting away the afternoon. Colour does not come into it and we are diverse as it happens, age certainly don't, drink is optional, but sitting there in mute silence is not. Ok? We have enough people telling us how to think, we've chartered a bus, I think we can pick our guests.Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.Big Cliff was King wrote: lutondown says... 11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13 Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion. As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68. As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied. I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about. Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.” We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers. Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose. But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
Harry's Bar
says...
9:54am Mon 25 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I thnk he's suggesting that he doesn't want to hear the patter of tiny hornet's feet coming over the South Downs.
Boosey wrote:I don't quite understand your post but in any case, no, you haven't upset anyone, certainly not me, and your post over the weekend was particularly good. I am not judging or criticising. But I agree with Harry's Bar - we're all enjoying this together - all types, all backgrounds, shapes and sizes. I don't like shouting and singing much (I do on occassions) because I am not that type of person. I am not apologising for this nor elevating myself. What I don't like is the suggestion that because of this I am not a "proper supporter". That's all.Eastsussexhornet wrote:I am in th so called group and where down the line have I upset you? So go and practise safe sex!lutondown wrote:Harry's Bar, this is why I decided to leave it at that. Groups that try to defend themselves to this extent are obviously a bit insecure despite trying to portray the opposite. And you and I will run out of steam far quicker than they will.....like I just have.Harry's Bar wrote:No mate we will have on this bus who we please and they will be like minded. And the key is those on the bus will be supporting their side, not tutting away the afternoon. Colour does not come into it and we are diverse as it happens, age certainly don't, drink is optional, but sitting there in mute silence is not. Ok? We have enough people telling us how to think, we've chartered a bus, I think we can pick our guests.Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.Big Cliff was King wrote: lutondown says... 11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13 Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion. As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68. As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied. I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about. Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.” We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers. Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose. But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
McHornet
says...
9:55am Mon 25 Feb 13
If you wanna have a row, can't you go and use Twitter or something else and leave the people that want to discuss football to it...?
Eastsussexhornet
says...
10:06am Mon 25 Feb 13
Harry's Bar wrote:Too late! There's 5 of them and two have Watford season tickets!
Eastsussexhornet wrote:I thnk he's suggesting that he doesn't want to hear the patter of tiny hornet's feet coming over the South Downs.
Boosey wrote:I don't quite understand your post but in any case, no, you haven't upset anyone, certainly not me, and your post over the weekend was particularly good. I am not judging or criticising. But I agree with Harry's Bar - we're all enjoying this together - all types, all backgrounds, shapes and sizes. I don't like shouting and singing much (I do on occassions) because I am not that type of person. I am not apologising for this nor elevating myself. What I don't like is the suggestion that because of this I am not a "proper supporter". That's all.Eastsussexhornet wrote:I am in th so called group and where down the line have I upset you? So go and practise safe sex!lutondown wrote:Harry's Bar, this is why I decided to leave it at that. Groups that try to defend themselves to this extent are obviously a bit insecure despite trying to portray the opposite. And you and I will run out of steam far quicker than they will.....like I just have.Harry's Bar wrote:No mate we will have on this bus who we please and they will be like minded. And the key is those on the bus will be supporting their side, not tutting away the afternoon. Colour does not come into it and we are diverse as it happens, age certainly don't, drink is optional, but sitting there in mute silence is not. Ok? We have enough people telling us how to think, we've chartered a bus, I think we can pick our guests.Eastsussexhornet wrote:I'm convinced LD meant no offence. The concern for me is the idea that there is only room for certain people on the "bus". Football is a game for everybody, from all walks of life, all classes, ages, colours, everyone. If you don't drink and sing it doesn't mean you don't belong. Let's all enjoy this journey together. (And readers... get posting!)lutondown wrote:I accept what you say. It's easy to misjudge on this (as you do too by the way!). Still not a nice word though bearing in mind where it eminated from.Big Cliff was King wrote: lutondown says... 11:37am Sun 24 Feb 13 Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion. As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68. As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied. I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about. Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.” We are not a million miles apart my friend. From my reading and enjoyment of your previous contributions it is clear that you had no intention to use the word in it's more disgusting sense. Its just that the word should really not be used because of it's potential for misinterpretation, willful or otherwise.So it's back to monks and librarians then! Glad g and k sit a fair way from each other on my iPhone keyboard so safe from my fat fingers. Just one more point on this subject, the term has been used numerous times on this forum, without reproach...strange it's one of my posts that has been singled out. Ah well I'm big and ugly enough for all of that, I suppose. But appreciate your comments and Big Cliff was King!
Eastsussexhornet
says...
10:07am Mon 25 Feb 13
McHornet wrote:Who's rowing?
Well done everybody for derailing a message board supposed to be for discussing the game and the fantastic result Watford got!
If you wanna have a row, can't you go and use Twitter or something else and leave the people that want to discuss football to it...?
Harry's Bar
says...
10:41am Mon 25 Feb 13
McHornet wrote:I don't want to disagree with you too much and start a blazing row, but.....
Well done everybody for derailing a message board supposed to be for discussing the game and the fantastic result Watford got! If you wanna have a row, can't you go and use Twitter or something else and leave the people that want to discuss football to it...?
I wouldn't have called it a row exactly, a heated discussion maybe, and I think it's ok for the posts to digress onto other football related issues occasionally.
JohnnyHornet
says...
12:07pm Mon 25 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:Yeah I realise that, but what a very good 2 fingered gesture to those that criticise us for doing nothing wrong.
Taxidermist wrote:I think when the bright spark who suggested a Udi shirt with B on back, he was suggesting it as our finger up to the general tripe that comes our way.
KeithMercer wrote:How about a shirt that is half Watford and half udinese?
JohnnyHornet wrote:Even better idea which would really sell is a Udinese top with a Watford badge on it ! This would look cool
lutondown wrote:Just trying to get Jon Marks BBC 3CR to retweet it to his followers, he thinks it's a brilliant Idea
JohnnyHornet wrote:They would sell like hot cakes! I'd buy one!
I saw 4 Peeps in the LRS earlier with what looked like Udun strips on, great idea, get the club to get them in so they make as well.
mk6 hornet
says...
1:39pm Mon 25 Feb 13
Eastsussexhornet wrote:thank you Sussex.
mk6 hornet wrote:Absolutely agree. I haven't the feintest idea why anyone would want to...
I cannot believe what i am hearing!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!why would anyone want to wear an udinese top at watford i am sorry i upset anyone with this statement but we are watford football club just because we have the same owner it does not mean i want to see them shirts sold at our club.
endean2
says...
5:17pm Mon 25 Feb 13
Now please tell me that we can return to matters foootall
never let it be said that we do not have a "rich and varied tapestary of fans"
with some strange views.
Harry's Bar
says...
10:56am Tue 26 Feb 13
endean2 wrote:Everyone is so different. Personally I have found this string of posts to be thoroughly entertaining. Well, it beats working!
YAWN,YAWN. Now please tell me that we can return to matters foootall never let it be said that we do not have a "rich and varied tapestary of fans" with some strange views.
Hampshire hornet
says...
3:38pm Tue 26 Feb 13
lutondown wrote:How dare you mention monks and librarians in your post.. My uncle the librarian Monk will be seeking legal advice ...
Good to see there are those wanting to twist my words out of proportion. As we don't see too many in fact any where I sit Down's syndrome sufferers at our games it's obvious that is not who I was referring to, and very much the person described by Holly 68. As there are two close family members who suffer with that disability, it was not what has been implied. I'm a bit peeved that anything other was suggested as my references to monks, librarians etc should have really explained who I was talking about. Anyway, the sooner we can all sit in our own respective areas the better.
Hampshire hornet
says...
3:47pm Tue 26 Feb 13
Did we beat Derby?
Anyway I am off to practice my clapping and sweet unwrapping whilst holding a flask.....
Hampshire hornet
says...
3:53pm Tue 26 Feb 13
Just had an amusing 10 minutes reading through the pointless posts .. . Holly was correct with his post ... lets all remain silent on this matter as we do at the VIC that'll solve it.. no longer will we comment on Croc wearing Full Kit W*nk3rs .. bring back the rattles -- I say .. clap clap clap tut (I dont wear crocs.. I do not own any nor want to .. however a full kit...)
Hampshire hornet
says...
3:56pm Tue 26 Feb 13
PlymouthHornet
says...
7:07pm Tue 26 Feb 13
lutondown
says...
8:06pm Tue 26 Feb 13
PlymouthHornet wrote:It got out there..might take some moving with our.....vocally challenged lot..but it was out there and a few hundred now know it.
How did the Cassetti tribute song go? Sorry I missed it have been out of circulation for a few days with man flu.
Wonder who that offended? The mute society of GB?
We will give an airing at Wolves along with our abbreviated version of yellow!
PlymouthHornet
says...
9:28pm Tue 26 Feb 13
Glad to hear that the football is pleasing on the eye, COYH !
lutondown
says...
9:32pm Tue 26 Feb 13
PlymouthHornet wrote:Well the worms are turning mate,
Glad to hear that it got an airing, when I waas lucky to be able to attend I used to get a lot of strange looks for daring to shout and sing.
Glad to hear that the football is pleasing on the eye, COYH !
PlymouthHornet
says...
6:21pm Wed 27 Feb 13
Running the risk of being shot down in flames I cant get to games anymore but it doesnt lessen the support.
COYH!
lutondown
says...
7:07pm Wed 27 Feb 13
PlymouthHornet wrote:Don't Make you less of a fan mate. Whatever differences all of us may have we are all Hornets till we die,.
Glad to hear it always felt out of place when being loud.
Running the risk of being shot down in flames I cant get to games anymore but it doesnt lessen the support.
COYH!
PlymouthHornet
says...
7:15pm Wed 27 Feb 13
lutondown
says...
7:37pm Thu 28 Feb 13
PlymouthHornet wrote:Look mate, myself and Boosey have had a chat. If you genuinely can't afford to get to a game, that's a crying shame. We will gladly help you out.
Thanks for that buddy. If cisrcumstances ever change you wont keep me away my first game was 1/1/1974 Southend United at home Billy Jennings getting the winner been addicted ever since lol
Mail me on lutondown@me.com
We're not rich or anything, but from your era, coupled with the fact we can as ST holders buy tickets for absent friends for £15 a game. Cach up and down, a few pints in West Herts club with us boys.
Don't be proud...this is help a Horn week!
PlymouthHornet
says...
6:02pm Fri 1 Mar 13
Hoping for a good result against Wolves tonight, COYH !


Mohandas says...
5:15pm Sat 23 Feb 13