Watford Youth Coach David Hughes admits his team 'failed to pose problems' in 4-0 defeat to Leeds United

This Is Local London: Head of Academy Nick Cox (left) and youth team coach David Hughes Head of Academy Nick Cox (left) and youth team coach David Hughes

Watford youth coach David Hughes believes his team “failed to pose problems with or without the ball” as they were convincingly beaten 4-0 by Leeds United in the third round of the FA Youth Cup.

Hughes’ side never really got going last night and fell behind after quarter of an hour when Whites striker Luke Parkin slotted the ball past Watford keeper Daniel Wilks.

Parkin netted a second before half-time and the visitors added two more goals after the interval through Lewis Walters and Alex Mowatts to book their place in the fourth round.

Watford never really created any goal scoring opportunities and Hughes admitted his boys did not handle the occasion well enough.

Hughes, who also coaches Wales Under-19s, said: “I thought Leeds were very, very good. I thought they moved it well, passed it well.

“We didn’t pose them problems with the ball when we were in possession and we didn’t pose them problems when we were out of possession in terms of pressing. I thought we were on the back foot.

“I’m looking and thinking how did we handle the occasion? Did we handle it well tonight? And it would be clear to say that we didn’t. “ Hughes stated he did not want to be too harsh on his players and insisted the result is an important learning experience for the team.

“They are young boys and we said to the lads ‘look it’s not the time to be critical now, you’re all disappointed, it’s time to reflect on why you’re disappointed,” he said.

“Think about what you could have done, think about what you need to do to improve and learn from this evening.

“There will be no getting away from it, we are all disappointed because some of the football we have played at times this season has been very, very good.”

Hughes felt his side were always playing backwards, which was inviting pressure on to their own defence.

The former centre half added: “Our first thought was backwards, we didn’t play forward, we didn’t have any penetration in behind which are all the things that we consistently do on a Saturday.

“The lads are disappointed but we’ll spend some time going through the video footage tomorrow (Thursday), which is what we always do, to try to give them some lessons to learn from tonight and hopefully they can.”

Despite the disappointment of the defeat, Hughes told the players it wasn’t a “make or break game” for the futures.

He said: “The mental side is one of the most important factors in developing young players. This one game isn’t going to make or break a career.

“We’ve got to learn from it, we’ve got to reflect and we’ve got to try to make sure that as coaches and as staff we educate the boys in what they didn’t do well tonight and then we come back and try to affect those areas in games moving forward.”

Hughes will be hoping he will be able to lift the team before they travel to Portsmouth a week on Saturday (December 8) in the Football League Youth Alliance South-East league.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:45pm Thu 29 Nov 12

Holly68 says...

Just one point, as we are Cat 3 we only play other Cat 3 youth teams week in week out, which means we are rolling most over and top of the league.

Clearly when you then play a higher tier team who is used to playing CAT 1 and CAT 2 teams week in week out, they smacked our bum.

I am happy for CAT 3 as it makes economic sense at the moment BUT the quality of opposition at that level is not as strong

Point over
Just one point, as we are Cat 3 we only play other Cat 3 youth teams week in week out, which means we are rolling most over and top of the league. Clearly when you then play a higher tier team who is used to playing CAT 1 and CAT 2 teams week in week out, they smacked our bum. I am happy for CAT 3 as it makes economic sense at the moment BUT the quality of opposition at that level is not as strong Point over Holly68
  • Score: 0

2:12pm Thu 29 Nov 12

gloryhornet4 says...

Holly68 wrote:
Just one point, as we are Cat 3 we only play other Cat 3 youth teams week in week out, which means we are rolling most over and top of the league.

Clearly when you then play a higher tier team who is used to playing CAT 1 and CAT 2 teams week in week out, they smacked our bum.

I am happy for CAT 3 as it makes economic sense at the moment BUT the quality of opposition at that level is not as strong

Point over
Agree. It is a shame but whether it justified an extra spend of about £1.4m a season. That said I quite like that the youth team mixed it with the big boys and having over 10,000 at Vic Rd to lift the FA Youth Cup beating Merchandise United.
[quote][p][bold]Holly68[/bold] wrote: Just one point, as we are Cat 3 we only play other Cat 3 youth teams week in week out, which means we are rolling most over and top of the league. Clearly when you then play a higher tier team who is used to playing CAT 1 and CAT 2 teams week in week out, they smacked our bum. I am happy for CAT 3 as it makes economic sense at the moment BUT the quality of opposition at that level is not as strong Point over[/p][/quote]Agree. It is a shame but whether it justified an extra spend of about £1.4m a season. That said I quite like that the youth team mixed it with the big boys and having over 10,000 at Vic Rd to lift the FA Youth Cup beating Merchandise United. gloryhornet4
  • Score: 0

4:09pm Thu 29 Nov 12

holtonian says...

gloryhornet4 wrote:
Holly68 wrote:
Just one point, as we are Cat 3 we only play other Cat 3 youth teams week in week out, which means we are rolling most over and top of the league.

Clearly when you then play a higher tier team who is used to playing CAT 1 and CAT 2 teams week in week out, they smacked our bum.

I am happy for CAT 3 as it makes economic sense at the moment BUT the quality of opposition at that level is not as strong

Point over
Agree. It is a shame but whether it justified an extra spend of about £1.4m a season. That said I quite like that the youth team mixed it with the big boys and having over 10,000 at Vic Rd to lift the FA Youth Cup beating Merchandise United.
Has not helped Leeds 1st team though.I think we have a great set up finding players now.Never been better since the the pozzo family took over.
[quote][p][bold]gloryhornet4[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Holly68[/bold] wrote: Just one point, as we are Cat 3 we only play other Cat 3 youth teams week in week out, which means we are rolling most over and top of the league. Clearly when you then play a higher tier team who is used to playing CAT 1 and CAT 2 teams week in week out, they smacked our bum. I am happy for CAT 3 as it makes economic sense at the moment BUT the quality of opposition at that level is not as strong Point over[/p][/quote]Agree. It is a shame but whether it justified an extra spend of about £1.4m a season. That said I quite like that the youth team mixed it with the big boys and having over 10,000 at Vic Rd to lift the FA Youth Cup beating Merchandise United.[/p][/quote]Has not helped Leeds 1st team though.I think we have a great set up finding players now.Never been better since the the pozzo family took over. holtonian
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree