<<Back to index

Comment | Read Comments (16)

All this firearms training, practise, and an increase in armed officers doesn't seem to ever get us very far, does it? Now we have the announced intention of spending ninety million quid of tax-payers' money on more of the same. What for? [bold]Bang! Bang![/bold] ...Oops, sorry, guv. Maybe the Met should concentrate on a smaller number of higher quality individuals - possibly specifically ex-military - in a quite separate branch, with different uniforms: firearms always look out of place in the hands of what is an essentially civilian police force.

It never ceases to amaze me how much money Metropolitan Police have to burn. I guess 90 million probably about 6 months’ savings on Amex bill Apparently 2 million in cash withdrawals went out on that in a few weeks

It never ceases to amaze me how many people bad mouth our police. If the centre isn't built, I reckon these will be the same people who, if threatened with a firearm, will bleat on about poor response times, not enough officers on the beat, etc. Hypocrites, the lot of them!!!

Jock, as with much else in the UK today, the of firearms use is being tackled from the wrong end: 90% of those who use them - including potential terrorists - shouldn't even [italic]be[/italic] in this country in the first place. I'm not bad-mouthing police officers so much as despising the people in Westminster supposedly charged with defending our borders, way of life, values, and territorial integrity. Our police officers should never have been put in this position. After all, I don't remember our ever having had such problems before we were blessed with multiculturalism and "diversity".

Please can we try and stop a story descending into racial hate rants for once! In reality the problem is the governments ideas of preventative measures. It seems that our all knowing leaders believe that the key to tackling gun crime is to get the gums off the streets before they can be used in crime. A sensible enough idea. But how do they go about this, by placing bans on replcia firearms, spouting nonsense that these are responsible for the majority of gun crime in the UK, where a gun is never fired. I believe that the building of this new centre is a step in the right direction and the government need to review their policies and start making some series plans for stopping weapons use. Instead of causing pain and annoyance to those who are not criminals.

Mike wrote: [quote]Please can we try and stop a story descending into racial hate rants for once![/quote] To which "race" might you be referring, Mike? ...And what's "hate" got to do with anything? BTW, I quite agree that "government need to review their policies"...on migrants/asylum-seek ers/refugees. After all, how often do you here of an Englishman using a firearm in a crime?

I wasn't reffering to any race in particular as there was no need and I am not discussing race here. I think you're reading a little too deeply into my comment and have taken it far too personally. It just seems every topic on here turns into a racial debate whether it has anything t do with race or not and this one doesnt! As soon as someone starts the race debate you get all the racists idiots come and ruin it. Anyway such a topic is not needed here. Yes I am with you that policies do need to be changed and open borders perhaps revoked but that has very little to do with firearms. Which is the subject of this article.

My point is, Mike, that the person who brought up the subject of race was [italic]you.[/italic] Mike wrote: [quote]I am with you that policies do need to be changed and open borders perhaps revoked but that has very little to do with firearms.[/quote] The matter of who is permitted to enter and live in this country [italic]does[/italic] have [italic]everything[/italic] "to do with firearms", as even a cursory glance at the news will show you that the great majority of criminals using firearms in the UK are of alien origin.

Actually you brought up the race issue with your comments on multiculturalism. And as for news, I think you need to take heed of the old saying, don;t believe everything you read.

Mike wrote: [quote]Actually you brought up the race issue with your comments on multiculturalism.[/quote] Yes, I commented on multiculturalism; no, I didn't comment on race - you did. Thus, when I responded to your post with [quote]To which "race" might you be referring...?[/quote] - I put the word in inverted commas, because [italic]I[/italic] was quoting [italic]you[/italic]. As for not believing everything one reads in the news, I assuredly don't: I seek confirmation or support from other sources - in this case my own eyes, ears, and experience around Croydon.

Do you know what, I realy don't care. I used the word "race" first, but your original post was purely to do with people from outside of Britain (therefore different races) who you believe should not be here. As for your experiences in Crydon, thats one area, thats not exactly a lot of support to go on. If i cared that much, I would have a word with some mates of mine in CO19 and see who they have to deal with mostly. My only concern was to stop another topic falling into debate about race, culture, whatever you want to call it. Especially when the topic of this report is nothing to do with it.

Mike wrote: [quote]your original post was purely to do with people from outside of Britain (therefore different races)...[/quote] Nonsensical: "people from outside of Britain" are automatically of a different race? Pray tell me: how does George Bush's "race" differ from mine? ...Or that of Bill Gates. Or of any American, Canadian, South African, Australian, or New Zealander of Anglo-Saxon-Celtic descent? ...Or 90% of the people in northern Europe, for that matter? I await the explanation of Mike's New Racial Classification System with much interest. And I hope you do indeed "have a word with some mates" of yours in CO19. In particular, ask any who are or who have been attached to Operation Trident. Apologies will be accepted through this column.

As I said before I no longer care realy. No that is not an admission of defeat but I am not getting drawn into an argument of semantics and pedentary. As for opertaion Trident, many people from communities it was aimed at have never heard of it, had any interaction with it and have no idea of its purpose. So it isnt exactly a model to be looked upon. As for apologies, don't make me laugh.

If you "longer care realy", why mention it in the first place? ...And treating "race" and "nationality" as synonyms is obviously wrong, and not "an argument" of semantics and pedantry: there's no argument about it! [quote] As for opertaion Trident, many people from communities it was aimed at have never heard of it...[/quote] The fact - if that is what it is - that many people from these "communities" (So coy! ... What "communities" are those, Mike?) "have never heard of it" means little: I suspect they haven't heard of a lot of things!

Croyboy you are such a moron . You blame immigrants or multiculturalism, for everything you deem to be a problem with this country, you harp on about how great life was before all these immigrants came and spoiled "your" country. Also you need to learn the legal definition of the the word "racist" it covers a multitude of sins i.e discrimition on grounds of culture and nationality and not just race. Mike hit the nail on the head with his first post when stating, idiots like you try to drag every comments section regarding any story into a racist attack, blaming anything and everything on as you put it "non indeginous" people To quote Winston Churchill "Who do you think your kidding mr Hitler..... sry I mean croyboy, your thinly veiled racism may be invisible to persons with a mental age of under twelve, but the rest of us can see your comments for what they they are ....racist claptrap.

Thank you, "big steve", for your thoughtful post. You begin with the declaration that I'm "such a moron", seemingly because [quote]You blame immigrants or multiculturalism, for everything you deem to be a problem with this country...[/quote] No. I certainly blame much of the unarguable deterioration in the quality of life on the flood of aliens we're required to host, but I [italic]don't[/italic] "blame immigrants or multiculturalism" for everything I - and many others - "deem to be a problem". If you've read what I've written here and elsewhere on this subject, you ought to understand that...being a strictly "non-moron" as you presumably are. And [quote]you harp on about how great life was before all these immigrants came and spoiled "your" country[/quote] Really? You appear to have the advantage of me: I can't recall ever having said that. Do you think you might be good enough to jog my memory? ...Or might this be another example of the reading-comprehensio n problem you're prone to? [quote]Also you need to learn the legal definition of the the word "racist" it covers a multitude of sins i.e discrimition on grounds of culture and nationality and not just race.[/quote] As it happens I am aware of the (new) legal (as opposed to the OED) definition of "racism", but it is in fact absurd, as race and nationality/national origin are quite separate - as I've already illustrated on this thread, thus I'm sure the wording will be found to be faulty the first time it's robustly challenged in court. Don't forget, Zionism was equated with racism by the UN at one time, but now no longer is. (Strictly speaking it's "tribalism" - but that's what happens when one uses language imprecisely!) [quote]To quote Winston Churchill "Who do you think your kidding mr Hitler...[/quote] Glad you mentioned Hitler; it reminded me that both my grandfathers and my father were in the British regular army, and fought in WWI and WWII respectively - for what they were told was [bold]their[/bold] country. Now, how would you characterise that, steve? ..."racist claptrap", perhaps?

Share this: Digg | del.icio.us | Furl | reddit | Facebook | Yahoo! | What's this?

What are these links for?

If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.

At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.

Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.

More on Digg

More on del.icio.us

More on Furl

More on reddit

More on NowPublic/

More on Yahoo!

Archive