News RSS Feed


21 'illegally' collected for animal rights terror

5:42am Thursday 22nd February 2007

comment Comments (6)   Have your say »


TWENTY-ONE people have been charged with illegally collecting thousands of pounds for animal rights "charities" - many with links to activist terrorism.

All of the suspects collected money at London's best-known shopping districts, including Oxford Street, Sloane Square and Knightsbridge.

Two stalls frequently run in Oxford Street alone made about £80,000 a year, police said.

However, the street collectors are accused of not having a license to do this, a Met police spokesman said. "This means that the money they collect is not subject to any audit, and is therefore untraceable and not accountable."

Many of the stalls carried flyers of Stop Huntingdon Against Cruelty (SHAC), a militant group that targets anyone with ties to the Cambridge animal-testing research company Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS).

SHAC members are suspected to be behind a baseball bat attack that left HLS boss Brian Cass within an inch of his life, a package of lethal explosives sent to scientist Heather Saunders, and countless cases of stalking and threats in Britain and America.

The street collectors allegedly lured unsuspecting animal lovers to their stalls with "petitions" that are often never sent anywhere. Officers have found such petitions at the suspects' houses on "numerous occasions", the Met spokesman added.

"Those collecting the money have been seen to just put the money straight in their pocket.

"Police believe that this money can easily be used to fund criminality or the lifestyle of full time extreme activists."

The 21 arrests in London include:

  • Rebecca Garrity, 19, of Seaton in Devon, and Alice Barton of Clapton in east London, pleaded guilty to illegally collecting money in Sloane Square.
  • Daniel Amos of Swindon, Wiltshire, and Selby Gerrah of Yately, Hampshire, admitted collecting without a license in Oxford Street.
  • Emma Speed of Leigh on Sea, Essex, Fran Cornwall of Milton Keynes and Pauline Broughton of Northampton have been charged with another illegal collection in Oxford Street. They are due at Westminster magistrates' court on 26 April.
  • Terence Russell and Kim Webster, both of Carshalton in Surrey, will appear in court on 11 April over a collection in Wimbledon.

Similar collections took place in Barnet, Sutton and Croydon, police said.

Detective Chief Inspector Tim Yarrow said lawful collectors would each wear a name tag. They will clearly display a license from the relevant authority and the charity they are promoting.

If they collect more than £100, they must submit their accounts for audit.

"Therefore members of the public giving money to organisations collecting without a license ... will have no certain knowledge of how that money is then spent," DCI Yarrow added.

"They may well be funding criminal activity".

In London, the Met's Charities Office can tell people the relevant authority for a street collection license.


Your Say YourThis Is Local London

Alice Barton, London says...
9:19am Tue 27 Feb 07

quote
Alice Barton and Rebecca Garrity were given an absolute discharge for the above as the judge realized how ridiculous all this was. He saw it as a waste of court time. The main aim of the stalls is not to make money though, it is to talk to the public and give out of leaflets. Since the police claim that the stalls have to be shut down since they are collecting money, it seems weird that stalls which only have leaflets and no collecting tin are also shut down! The police want to limit our freedom of speech and that’s why there is a biased article like the above!

thomas, says...
7:48pm Tue 27 Feb 07

I will give this some perspective from the Animal Rights side of things. Having experience with those stalls, I can say that the money is collected under somewhat false pretenses as to where it will go, the petitions are never sent anywhere - and as far as the money collected for SHAC specifically, much of it is squandered on personal indulgences for the people running the campaign (Natasha and Gregg Avery), not used for Animal Rights. The fact that these people are not accountable to -anyone- doesn't help, and I hate to see precious Animal Rights money that people donate for animals used for squat.

Watcher, N England says...
12:00pm Wed 28 Feb 07

Thank you Thomas! At last someone prepared to tell the truth about Animal Rights Extremists.
Don't ever give these criminals money.

thomas, says...
9:16am Fri 2 Mar 07

Watcher, I don\'t think Natasha and Gregg Avery with SHAC are criminals. What they are are destructive individuals who use others for their own egos and gain, so much that even people in their own movement despise them. Many question whether they care so much about the animals as they do lining their own pockets and bolstering their personal power. This is why money should not go to them (unless you want to support their personal lifestyle). Money desperately needs to go to legitimate animal rights causes, as I do believe that we must help the animals here in the UK and elsewhere. But some spoil it for the others.

Richard, Oxford says...
10:06am Fri 2 Mar 07

There are loads of ways you can exercise your freedom of speech. If you want to do it with a high street stall then get a licence like everyone else. I very much doubt the judge saw this as a waste of time considering the large amount of regulation covering real charities to make sure money is used properly and the public aren't defrauded.

Claire, London says...
12:13am Sat 3 Mar 07

What is this biased rubbish? Rebecca & Alison's case was thrown out as it was so ridiculous, it's disgraceful that their personal details are being printed here. The real fact is that this government are so scared about the truth regarding the fraud of vivisection getting out. The biased police force are carrying out their orders to censor us all! I have helped on 2 AR stalls and been harrassed and bullied both times, once stall took a few pounds (not £100's) and the other collected no money at all, it didn't make a difference to how I was treated. It seems there are too many people out there who believe EVERYTHING they read! We are NOT criminals, we care a whole lot... that's our only crime!!!

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »