Censorship claim after Claygate campaigners' banner withdrawn

The banner before it was taken down

The banner before it was taken down

First published in News by

Surrey County Council has been accused of censorship after taking down an anti parking charges banner.

The banner in The Parade in Claygate, which read: “Claygate says no to parking charges”, was put up by the Claygate Village Association charity on March 13.

But when the charity asked SCC for permission to extend the time the banner could stay installed beyond March 31, the council refused.

Elmbridge Councillor Michael Courtney, who supported the erection of the banner, said SCC had objected to the continuation because of the message.

He said: “This is censorship. When the charity went back to the council to agree a continuation, the council told them they would have to take it down instead.

“The council then said they should never have allowed the banner to be put up in the first place. The idea that people are only allowed to put banners up in favour of SCC policies is ridiculous. They just want to stop our campaign.”

Surrey County Council (SCC) wants to raise up to £2.5m by implementing parking fees in 3,500 on-street parking spaces across Surrey over the next 12 months and is looking at introducing the scheme in Elmbridge as early as next month.

It would see drivers being charged between 60p and £1.40 an hour to park in the bays.

Two men, working for SCC, took the banner down on Wednesday, April 6, after the Claygate Village Association refused to do so.

A spokesman for the council admitted the authority had originally given permission for the banner to be erected but refused to comment on the reasons behind the decision not to grant it an extension.

The spokesman said: “We allow banners to be placed on the roadside for short periods of time to support communities when they hold events such as flower shows or fetes.

“We were asked if a banner could be put up along The Parade between 13 March and 31 March and we agreed. Now that time is up we have taken the banner down.”

Do you think the banner should remain? Leave your comment below.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:31am Mon 11 Apr 11

Beentheredoneit says...

Michael Courtney is politicising and now has cost us tax payers to get the SCC to take down the sign! Liberals wasting a few hundred pounds more ........ Geoff Herbert's approach to SCC is much better.
Michael Courtney is politicising and now has cost us tax payers to get the SCC to take down the sign! Liberals wasting a few hundred pounds more ........ Geoff Herbert's approach to SCC is much better. Beentheredoneit
  • Score: 0

10:19pm Tue 12 Apr 11

GR-London says...

Why must these parasites bleed the public dry - when is enough?

This country just goes further and further downhill.
Why must these parasites bleed the public dry - when is enough? This country just goes further and further downhill. GR-London
  • Score: 0

9:57am Wed 13 Apr 11

JPR says...

Pure stalinism, it's so easy to racket the country and shut off all communications.
Why do we elect such people to only mess with us?
Pure stalinism, it's so easy to racket the country and shut off all communications. Why do we elect such people to only mess with us? JPR
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree