- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
Twitter
Follow This is Local London on Twitter
HAVE YOUR SAY: Reader Rant - speed cameras good for road safety (From This Is Local London)
Report news now! Text pictures & video to 80360, starting message with WITNESS then leave a space
HAVE YOUR SAY: Reader Rant - speed cameras good for road safety
12:00pm Wednesday 28th July 2010 in News
Read News Shopper's daily opinion columns and have your say
In this week's Reader Rant opinion column Amy Aeron-Thomas, executive director of charity RoadPeace, argues the case for speed cameras improving road safety. Have your say by adding your comments below.
WITH the announcement Oxfordshire County Council was to stop funding safety cameras, the BBC has asked if it was the end of the road for speed cameras.
It could have equally asked it this was the end to evidence-based road safety policy, given the wealth of studies showing how cameras reduce speeding and casualties.
After the fourth national safety camera evaluation in 2005 confirmed the findings of the three previous studies, the government stopped documenting the effectiveness of cameras at the national level. Extensive research had proven cameras reduced speeding, crashes and casualties, with 42 per cent fewer people killed and seriously injured at camera sites.
There is no new evidence to suggest cameras are ineffective.
What has ended is the choice of the local councils to choose how they spend their transport grant. Since 2007, local councils have had discretion as to how they spent their money.
The coalition government has now decided for them and is not allowing them to use any of the grant for safety cameras.
If the Conservatives are serious about listening to communities, then speed enforcement will continue to be important.
Speeding vehicles was the leading cause of anti-social behaviour reported by the British Crime Survey.
With cameras’ proven effectiveness at reducing casualties and speeding, and the potential to be a self-financing intervention, this is the time to increase camera enforcement, not discourage it.
This column is produced by an independent writer and in no way reflects the official position of News Shopper or its parent company.
Do you think there are too many speed cameras already or should there be more? Do you believe cameras help to reduce accidents? Have your say and add your comments below.
Meanwhile, check News Shopper's website every lunchtime for a new daily opinion column. Thursday will cover a moral issue. Friday is a sport rant. Monday is back to the Shopper Rant on a topical news story. Tuesday is entertainment day. Be sure to have your say if you agree or disagree with what you read.
We're also looking for articles to be considered for next Wednesday's Reader Rant. It needs to be something interesting, lively, thought-provoking and outspoken which will spark debate among readers.
Send your article to web manager Simon Bull at sbull@london.newsquest.co.uk
Comments(13)
Cab Driver Echo Yankee
says...
12:50pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Agree with rwb4732 ,so often when i`m out in my licensed taxi we see cars slowing down the minute they see a speed camera ,then speeding up once they have cleared the dotted lines on the road .I guess it`s more about raking in revenue than really about road safety from various councils who could help the travelling public by filling in their pot holes and helping us get around more easily .Thanks guys .
MJB
says...
1:02pm Wed 28 Jul 10
David Rolfe
says...
2:32pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Stuart Bellinger
says...
4:46pm Wed 28 Jul 10
porkpie
says...
5:14pm Wed 28 Jul 10
Stuart Bellinger wrote:Half wrong ! Speed doesn't kill, suddenly stopping does ! FACT
The whole system is a joke. Speed doesn't kill, bad driving does.
GnT
says...
1:12pm Fri 30 Jul 10
Stuart us right - speed does not kill, bad driving does.
MB
says...
12:09pm Tue 3 Aug 10
David Rolfe wrote:This is definitely true. I used to live in a more upmarket part of North London and I was stunned by the difference in people's driving when I first moved to SE London. I also agree on the solution - income from speed cameras should be exclusively used to hire more front line police.
Anyone noticed that the grubbiest areas seem to have the worst drivers in them? for example, no indicating, no giving way, driving with a headlight not working, running red lights, driving down center of roads, double parked, triple parked, drivng very fast, music blasting out, i think we should do what they do in the states - employ tens of thousands of more police to deal with law breakers!
GODUPERE2
says...
10:05pm Tue 3 Aug 10
Stuart Bellinger wrote:Sorry, Speed does kill, after giving my dog almost two ounces of it his heart gave out!
The whole system is a joke. Speed doesn't kill, bad driving does.
handymanchris
says...
8:44am Thu 5 Aug 10
If you was to look at countrys who dont have speed cameras such as Turkey, Cyprus and places where speed is not top of the agenda there are far less accidents then here with cameras.
This country is obsessed with making it all safe it doesn't work, don't let your kids eat food without washing their hands, don't let them climb tree's all and so on.
I think the cameras should be scrapped, i can't see where the money they earn go in to? State of the roads don't say alot.
Slonik
says...
2:46pm Sun 8 Aug 10
Roman
says...
10:44am Wed 11 Aug 10
porkpie wrote:im afraid your both wrong. stuart, if your driving at 120 mph and your tyre blows out at the front, you will lose control of your vehicle and crash and proberly end up dead, no matter who the driver and how good they was, so your statement is totally wrong.
Stuart Bellinger wrote:Half wrong ! Speed doesn't kill, suddenly stopping does ! FACT
The whole system is a joke. Speed doesn't kill, bad driving does.
pork pie, same thing your driving at 120 your front tyre explodes, you hit the central reservation and your car flips and lands on the roof crushing the car and killing you instantly before continuing its out of control spin down the carrige way....wasnt stopping suddenly that killed you, it was the high speed impact to your vehicle crushing it and caving your head in........NOW THAT IS FACT ! SPEED KILLS END OF STORY. if you hit a a pedestrian at 20 mph 99 % will survive, at 30 mph 80% will survive at 40 mph 80% will die....so you keep trying to kid yourselfs that your wreckless endangerment of our lives by speeding round our highways is ok, cos you THINK your a good driver so it is ok. lets just pray you dont kill someone or yourself eh !
DM1928
says...
8:35pm Thu 12 Aug 10
rw4732 says...
12:40pm Wed 28 Jul 10