News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Transport chief: speed cameras could go


SPEED cameras across Buckinghamshire could go after a transport boss said the council is “very likely” to follow Oxfordshire’s move to cut road safety funding.

Buckinghamshire County Councillor Val Letheren tonight told the Free Press the decision to withdraw cash - about £600,000 - from Thames Valley Road Safety Partnership is a ‘serious’ possibility.

Due to Government cuts Oxfordshire road bosses have recommended cutting its funding to the partnership - which manages speed cameras - meaning its 72 fixed devices will be switched off.

There are 51 fixed cameras and 64 'mobile enforcement locations' in Buckinghamshire.

As previously reported in The Bucks Free Press, BCC has said it wants to see cash spent on other road safety measures instead of cameras (see link, bottom of story).

Cllr Letheren said: “We are going to see how we proceed. I haven’t made up my mind but we are looking at seriously how to make savings.

"If Oxford comes out of the TVSRP, they and us are the biggest contributor.

“We did to talk to Oxford and understand what they are doing but we haven’t yet made up our minds.

“It’s very likely we will do the same but we haven’t made the decision yet.

“We are seriously considering following the same line.

"We have to go through the options with all the partners, the other 8 local authorities.

“We’ve had a tremendous cut in funds. The road safety revenue grant has been reduced by 27 per cent and the capital grant deleted so we can’t buy new equipment.”

She said if Oxfordshire councillors do confirm withdrawal from the partnership “we’d get out as well” as “it won’t work because we are the two biggest players”.

BCC and Oxfordshire combined contribute more than half of the funds to the partnership.

The matter will be discussed at BCC’s Cabinet meeting tomorrow.

However, cameras would not be switched off until March 31 2011 and it would not necessarily mean every device would go, she said.

But she added BCC would have to look at alternatives.

“We might look at different ways of doing road safety, like encouraging villages to do more work and communities to help,” she said.

“We have already done a lot of work with villages where local communities help with speed watching.

“We are looking at ways we can still have road safety activity but how we could work it differently.”

Thames Valley Police and The Highways Agency are also funding partners, while fire and rescue services, the Crown Prosecution Service, and magistrates are also involved in the group.

Click the link below for more.


Comments(11)

Slimster says...
9:48pm Sun 25 Jul 10

See, the recession has a silver lining.
+
Good luck getting another job to anyone with Scamera Pratnership on their CV.

guesswork says...
10:03pm Sun 25 Jul 10

Have the number of accidents on the roads gone down?

Are there other methods of traffic calming that could be more effective?

Considering repairing pot-holes vs static cameras. What has the best effect on statistics. I'm guessing the first would be most welcomed by drivers.

What is the cost of traffic calming paint vs static cameras?

A couple of ideas.

Plus ça change... says...
11:21pm Sun 25 Jul 10

Paint may calm traffic but it upsets me!

We should already have automatic area slowdown devices at the road side where appropriate so it is impossible to go faster.

We are still in the 'Dark Ages' with paint on roads and these aesthetically intrusive yellow boxes.

It's all pollution and we don't see it as such. Crude stuff.

ivor says...
11:52pm Sun 25 Jul 10

Most of them weren't switched on anyway....
~
Have you read Ivor’s blog today? Click on the “BLOGS” link at the top of the page.

Voyeur says...
1:23am Mon 26 Jul 10

I think the majority of people would welcome the removal of speed cameras. They only change driver behaviour in the near vicinity of the camera site anyway.

wayneo says...
8:03am Mon 26 Jul 10

Isn't it odd, how when netting off (obtaining a cut from fines) was available, speed cameras were the best thing since sliced bread, we couldn't get enough of them, they were saving countless baaaabies lives a year.

Now that they're not getting a cut from the cameras, the things are going, so what is it? have we been misled by the TVSRP and Letheren? clearly politicians have put our lives at risk by pursuing a means of raising revenue, as opposed to implementing options that actually work. I wonder how many people have died as a result.

motco says...
9:25am Mon 26 Jul 10

I'd rather they removed speed humps. I avoid the cameras by not speeding, but I cannot avoid the damned humps.

Seasence1 says...
9:52am Mon 26 Jul 10

i dont agree with speed cameras, they dont catch uninsured drivers, people with no licence and people who are just cr*p drivers.. more road policing is needed. The place where we do need cameras is at traffic lights to stop people jumping red lights

A VOTER says...
10:46am Mon 26 Jul 10

So, the speed cameras were always used as financial revenue generators, and not a safety device. As others have said above, the cameras never caught Car Tax dodgers, or those without MOT or insurance, and they never caught bad drivers.
The "ONLY" place cameras are valid as safety devices, is at traffic lights. They are not effective at any other location.
Yes, we the drivers have been lied to all these years.

efbog says...
11:16am Mon 26 Jul 10

Whilst i dont agree with scamera's I do wonder at the Bucks Councillors.
ability to make a decision and lead?

kaysee says...
11:47am Mon 26 Jul 10

Seasense1 makes perfect sense.


Speed cameras raise more than £65m a year, it has been claimed Transport chief: Speed cameras could go

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses