News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


"Hard decisions" on gypsy sites, Wycombe District Council says


“HARD decisions” will need to be made in finding gypsies places to live, a council boss said.

Wycombe District Council is to consult on proposed sites where it would allow planning permission for gypsies and travellers.

They hope this will stop illegal encampments such as a site in Hemley Hill near Princes Risborough.

The fate of this site will be decided by an independent planning appeal next year – and the council hopes it can win by offering alternative locations (see link, bottom of story).

Bosses could be forced to buy proposed sites, listed at the end of this story.

Councillor Jean Teesdale, cabinet member for planning, said: “We've all got concerns. Every person involved will have concerns about this issue, that's the whole point of the consultation.

“We've got to make some hard decisions. It's not easy and we know the public are concerned, and we share those concerns. We have seen the problems in Hemley Hill.

“My constituents, if they have seen the Bucks Free Press, will soon be on to me.”

Cllr Audrey Jones told Monday’s WDC cabinet meeting: “We need to be careful how we put this consultation out and make the public understand the reasons why we are doing it.”

She pointed out the council would have had to find the places anyway as this is a national requirement of councils from the Government.

Jeff Herschel, chairman of Chepping Wycombe Parish Council, which could see caravans at Ashwells in Tylers Green, said: “At the end of the day travellers need somewhere to stay.”

Yet he told the BFP he “wouldn’t be surprised” if plans were rejected as “crazy”.

“We look forward to seeing exactly what they propose.”

Malcolm Penny, vice chairman of Stokenchurch Parish Council said: “We want to know a great deal more about it before we make a considered response.”

The suggested sites are:

• The Willows, North Lee Lane, Bishopstone (1-5 pitches).

• Dry Banks, opposite Kiln Farm, Oxford Road, Stokenchurch (6-12 pitches and up to 2 traveller plots).

• Land adjoining Pettigrove, Lower Icknield Way, Longwick (up to 2 traveller plots).

• Park Mill Farm, Princes Risborough (1-12 pitches).

• Former agricultural research establishment, Bishopstone (1-12 pitches).

• Abbey Barn North, High Wycombe (1-5 pitches).

• Storage site, Oxford Road, Stokenchurch (1-5 pitches).

• Ashwells, Tylers Green, High Wycombe (1-12 pitches).


Comments(7)

bernaaard says...
1:55pm Wed 9 Dec 09

I have a good place for them, hell, why dont they go there.

When are they gonna learn we dont want them here. You are travellers right, so travel. Keep on going and dont look back !

pennman says...
2:29pm Wed 9 Dec 09

Building permanent residences for people who are nomadic is another idiotic european human rights law we can do without. But, if we disagree with building then we're all racists (of course), despite the huge amount of abuse an asian friend has whenever he walks past a 'traveller'

Hit me says...
2:48pm Wed 9 Dec 09

I can only assume that these sites will charge travellers for their stays?

... because surely we wouldn't be buying up land and letting them live on it for free?

If so, I'm off to buy me a caravan. Will save me 000's in council tax alone every year!

pennman says...
3:27pm Wed 9 Dec 09

Hit me wrote:
I can only assume that these sites will charge travellers for their stays? ... because surely we wouldn't be buying up land and letting them live on it for free? If so, I'm off to buy me a caravan. Will save me 000's in council tax alone every year!
and tax, because 'travellers' don't tend to pay any.

aspen g says...
3:50pm Wed 9 Dec 09

I have nothing against gypsies but what I find galling is that there are probably thousands of young single adults in Bucks who can't get a council flat and are forced to live in substandard renting accomodation.

How come the council is offering to buy land for travellers (and thus bypass any housing waiting lists), while thousands of young adults in Bucks struggle?

Perhaps these young people need to buy caravans and turn up on the Rye for the local council to take them seriously?

weyfarer says...
6:57pm Wed 9 Dec 09

If most 'travellers' are in fact foreign, i.e. Irish, why does the British taxpayer have to accomodate them?
Also why are the sites wieghted towards the Princes Risborough area of the district- 4 out of 8 sites? Is this because Marlow is a sensitive area where Tories could lose seats to the Lib-Dems if they make unpopular moves locally?

sportsturf says...
11:07pm Sun 13 Dec 09

why the hell should we give these scumbags sites anyway.....we gave them one at High Heavens years ago.....and what did they do....???....oh yeah....they trashed the friggin place, wrecked the toilet shower blocks and took all the copper piping etc for scrap...dont let them into england in the first place....they should have immigration checks done, and turned back....


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses