News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Head gets £120k and council boss £220k as top earners revealed

Buckinghamshire County Council's offices in Aylesbury Buckinghamshire County Council's offices in Aylesbury

THE number of Schools staff on more than £50,000 rose by a quarter in one year – with one head getting about £120,000.

Newly released figures show a sharp increase in the number of top staff, thought to be heads, from 255 in 2007/08 to 332 to 2008/09.

And the number of managers at Buckinghamshire County Council, the local education authority, on more than £50,000 went up about a fifth, from 163 to 197.

The figures also reveal its chief executive, Chris Williams, got £210,000 to £219,999 last year.

This sum – set by the ruling Conservative council – appears to jar with a new Tory policy over pay, which comes amid a Government squeeze on senior salaries.

Any move to pay a public servant more than the Prime Minister, presently £197,689, will need the chancellor’s approval, shadow chancellor George Osborne said yesterday.

The authority refused to name the top earning head, who got £120,000 to £129,999, when asked by the Bucks Free Press. It would only provide salaries in bands.

Marc Wallace, spokesman for the TaxPayers’ Alliance pressure group, said: “These are very alarming jumps.

“When local taxpayers are facing redundancies and pay freezes in the private sector, it is unjustifiable for the council or local schools to be handing out more and more money.”

The council should name the top earners, he said, “particularly this extremely highly paid headteacher”.

Annette Pryce, Bucks secretary for the National Union of Teachers, said: “It is surprising to see the number of senior posts paid above the £50,000 mark has risen so substantially.”

Only the “very top” teachers would get about £45,000, she said, and said a lull in recruitment could have seen more top earners.

Teachers working in “difficult circumstances” deserved the cash, she said, but the news would “only serve to reopen the debate about elevated pay for senior staff”.

John Hakes, a spokesman for the National Association of Headteachers, said heads’ pay was too low given their responsibilities, including some who manage budgets of millions.

Their jobs were less safe because of public scrutiny and he said: “They are hard to recruit – there is an argument that salaries are not in line with the market at the moment.”

Councillor Frank Downes, responsible for finance on the county council, said schools pay was set by the Government and defended the council’s setting of pay for its own staff.

He said: “We hold our chief executive in high regard – you want good people. We manage a budget of £700m so it is a big job.”

And he said the council – which is struggling to fill a hole in its budget – provided a “high level of service” which it is “trying hard to maintain in very difficult circumstances”.

Mr Williams’ previous 2007/08 salary was £190,000 to £199,999. There was outrage when it was revealed in April that this was a 44 per cent increase on the previous year (see link, bottom of story).

The Government’s Department for Children, Schools and Families had yet to comment at the time of going to press.

Last week senior NHS pay was revealed (see links, below). The boss of an authority named the worst in England for its management got £155,000 to £160,000.

Comments(15)

demoness says...
10:22am Wed 7 Oct 09

Firstly BFP - ALL public sector workers pay tax too so lets get rid of that tired old argument about tax payers paying our wages..
Secondly - the tories when they get back in to National Government have pledged to freeze public sector workers pay.
I think that is fair enough but only if that includes high ranking managers as well - parity for all.

demoness says...
10:24am Wed 7 Oct 09

Oh and please tell me why this high earning teacher should be named?
Is this so he/can be faced with a barrage of abuse for daring to be paid so much?
No doubt all the armchair critics will come out with the usual hogwash about teachers having long holidays etc which is as ignorant as it is amusing.

Agniesca says...
10:28am Wed 7 Oct 09

Since the public sector pension scheme is a significant benefit, should its value not be added to quoted salaries. If this were done for all workers in employer pension schemes we could then judge whether they were over or under-paid.

J B Blackett says...
3:55pm Wed 7 Oct 09

Everything is in a bit of a mess financially at every level in this country and worldwide at the moment.
.
However this could be said to have been true for about 80 years but has been accelerating in recent years while things have been dictated by events outside our control aided useless short-sighted 'politicians'. But nobody wants to admit it - we've been living in a monetary fantasy world. And nobody (particularly politicians and bankers) are capable of understanding how it really works
.
MPs expenses , public servants pay , the obscene wealth of multi-billionaires are just symptoms of the instabilities of an out of control world system. They are not the causes , just the undesirable side effects.
.
We've allowed a system to evolve which is now too complex to control , in my opinion. To regain control , everything must be made a lot simpler and then the financial mechanisms for control can be put in place to everybody's benefit.
.
In the meantime it is a mess , full of haphazard unstable incomprehensible random processes.
And it's everyman for himself - and that includes Bucks councillors and Heads of Health Trusts.
.
Still look on the bright side ; at least we're not controlled by some archaic backward looking sect like some places (not yet anyway). My worst nightmare , I'm afraid - that we go back to mediaeval times.
.
I prefer now with all its faults to those days. There are no simple answers but time resolves these things one way or the other.
.
Regards

HeartyR says...
4:45pm Wed 7 Oct 09

I agree that the naming of the head Teacher serves no valid purpose. However, I am wondering how a Tory Authority will cope with the public service wage freeze coupled with a cut in the Chief Executive's salary to ensure that it is less than the Prime Minister's! I would love to a fly on the wall when the two David's get together (Shakespeare and Cameron) . On the other hand the public services may vote Brown back to save their salaries. Now that's a thought.

HeartyR says...
4:45pm Wed 7 Oct 09

I agree that the naming of the head Teacher serves no valid purpose. However, I am wondering how a Tory Authority will cope with the public service wage freeze coupled with a cut in the Chief Executive's salary to ensure that it is less than the Prime Minister's! I would love to a fly on the wall when the two David's get together (Shakespeare and Cameron) . On the other hand the public services may vote Brown back to save their salaries. Now that's a thought.

GoldGold says...
6:09pm Wed 7 Oct 09

Exposed crime. Well i guess i have to agree with Hearty. the name now is not essential thing, what is important is the regaining of the lost.

Regards,
http://www.goldcoins
gain.com

yog says...
11:45pm Wed 7 Oct 09

So much for the CONservatives cutting back on public spending. Seems that if you are friends with a Con you get looked after well - must be in the handshake!

demoness says...
6:12am Thu 8 Oct 09

yog wrote:
So much for the CONservatives cutting back on public spending. Seems that if you are friends with a Con you get looked after well - must be in the handshake!
Looks like the lib dems don't like teachers...

Another reason for us public sector workers not to vote them in..
Well done yog you are doing a fine job putting people off your rabble.

yog says...
9:06am Thu 8 Oct 09

demoness wrote:
yog wrote:
So much for the CONservatives cutting back on public spending. Seems that if you are friends with a Con you get looked after well - must be in the handshake!
Looks like the lib dems don't like teachers...

Another reason for us public sector workers not to vote them in..
Well done yog you are doing a fine job putting people off your rabble.
Still talking rubbish demoness? If you really are a public sector worker then I don't believe the public are receiving value for money judging by the amount of time you spend trolling websites!

rambler241 says...
8:16am Fri 9 Oct 09

"Firstly BFP - ALL public sector workers pay tax too so lets get rid of that tired old argument about tax payers paying our wages"

Just who does pay them then? The National lottery? Some un-named charity?

demoness says...
8:44am Fri 9 Oct 09

yog wrote:
demoness wrote:
yog wrote: So much for the CONservatives cutting back on public spending. Seems that if you are friends with a Con you get looked after well - must be in the handshake!
Looks like the lib dems don't like teachers... Another reason for us public sector workers not to vote them in.. Well done yog you are doing a fine job putting people off your rabble.
Still talking rubbish demoness? If you really are a public sector worker then I don't believe the public are receiving value for money judging by the amount of time you spend trolling websites!
ohh yog you bi atch!

Basically anyone who sees thro your nastiness is a troll.
PMSL.

demoness says...
8:45am Fri 9 Oct 09

rambler241 wrote:
"Firstly BFP - ALL public sector workers pay tax too so lets get rid of that tired old argument about tax payers paying our wages" Just who does pay them then? The National lottery? Some un-named charity?
My point is.... public sector workers are also tax payers so in effect contribute to their own wages.
So that argument is not valid.

yog says...
9:10am Fri 9 Oct 09

demoness wrote:
rambler241 wrote:
"Firstly BFP - ALL public sector workers pay tax too so lets get rid of that tired old argument about tax payers paying our wages" Just who does pay them then? The National lottery? Some un-named charity?
My point is.... public sector workers are also tax payers so in effect contribute to their own wages.
So that argument is not valid.
More incoherent rubbish from the resident troll!

demoness says...
12:35pm Fri 9 Oct 09

yog wrote:
demoness wrote:
rambler241 wrote: "Firstly BFP - ALL public sector workers pay tax too so lets get rid of that tired old argument about tax payers paying our wages" Just who does pay them then? The National lottery? Some un-named charity?
My point is.... public sector workers are also tax payers so in effect contribute to their own wages. So that argument is not valid.
More incoherent rubbish from the resident troll!
Oh I say! I am a resident troll! How amazing.

So are you saying that public sector workers do not pay taxes? That is a scandal? Has it been reported to the daily Mail? Someone should do that immediately.
Curse those freeloaders... :)

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree