News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


REDBRIDGE: Lack of disabled toilets a "disgrace"


REVELATIONS that there is not a single disabled-friendly Changing Places toilet in the entire borough has led carers to accuse Redbridge Council of neglecting their needs.

Washrooms with a hoist, changing bench and plenty of space are the necessary to help severely disabled people relieve themselves in dignity.

However, many friends and family members claim loved ones with limited mobility must make do with filthy floors of traditional conveniences and have demanded better access to proper facilities.

Helen Coughlan, of Roding Lane North in Woodford Green, has cared for her 42-year-old brother Matthew most of her life.

He is deaf and almost totally blind with deformed feet and a life-threatening skin condition and Aspergers syndrome leaving him with the mental age of eight or nine.

Mrs Coughlan said: “Having a Changing Places toilet would be very beneficial as we have to get Matthew out of his wheelchair and make him walk on his knees.

“Most public toilets are absolutely disgusting and we normally have to go to a Harvester or somewhere where there are disabled facilities.

“Normally I've got to watch his fluid intake and what he drinks when we are out. Shops and restaurants have to have clean bathrooms so I don't know why the council doesn't also.”

The Changing Places Consortium - including Mencap and the Centre for Acessible Environment - campaigns for Changing Places toilets to be installed in big public places.

Anna Smith, of Hermon Hill, South Woodford, said it was a “disgrace” that Redbridge does not provide a single Changing Places toilet.

She said: “People with profound and multiple learning disabilities should have the same opportunities as everyone else.

“Without them carers are often forced to change their disabled loved-ones on dirty toilet floors.”

“And carers have enough to contend with - let's not make their lives harder by denying them the right to basic public facilities.”

A Redbridge Council spokeswoman said: “We haven’t had any requests to introduce Changing Places toilets in Council managed public toilets.

“Our public toilets are kept to a high standard and the majority of them have disabled facilities along with baby changing facilities.”

Comments(4)

9inch says...
4:33pm Fri 3 Jul 09

and this is what we pay council taxes for, they can't even provide basic facilities for members of the community who have such challenges to cope with in everyday life.

Bess says...
5:02pm Fri 3 Jul 09

Being a disabled person in Woodford Green, I couldn't agree more with this. The lack of proper disabled facilities in the borough is a disgrace

The unnamed council spokesperson is clearly deluding themselves when they to say 'our public toilets are kept to a high standard'. pffff

Fresh Gravee says...
12:19pm Sat 4 Jul 09

The toilets were all closed down because of 'anti-social behaviour'
and illegal sexual activity and goings on. The Police never intervened as it was not PC so this is the result.

mdj says...
2:34pm Sat 4 Jul 09

Amazingly, local authories have a power, but NOT a duty, to provide public sanitation. This was used by Waltham Forest as an excuse to close down all but one of its public loos last year, promoting instead the idea of cafes and pubs opening their premises for non-cutomers for a small fee. While this would be a useful supplement to a well-run public service, I asked several times what obligation there would be on private premises to stay in the scheme, should some untoward event take place that might put them off the idea. Answer came there none. LBWF's loos had been inspected by the Audit Commission a year or two previously, and found 'well-run and value for money'. The one loo that stayed open is at Chingford Mount, and is fully-staffed (It won a national award, I believe). The other loos predictably became squalid and dangerous when the Council stopped staffing them. So the loos closed, to save £400,000 pa. The Councillors also voted to increase their salaries and allowances by £240,000 pa, which is much better value for money.The nearly-new loo in Leytonstone was covered with a hoarding for a while promoting it as a state-of-the-art office suite, but strangely enough it remains unlet.


Matthew Brook and Helen Coughlan are demanding more disabled-friendly toilets in Redbridge (EL2387) Matthew Brook and Helen Coughlan are demanding more disabled-friendly toilets in Redbridge (EL2387)

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses