'Give voters power to sack councillors' - calls for recall after ex-Kingston councillor Tim Dennen sentenced for benefit fraud

This Is Local London: Ex Kingston councillor Tim Dennen admitted seven counts of council tax benefit fraud Ex Kingston councillor Tim Dennen admitted seven counts of council tax benefit fraud

Voters should be given the power to throw out councillors who abuse their positions, politicians in Kingston have said.

The call for a Parliamentary-style Recall Bill for local authorities came this week after former Kingston councillor Tim Dennen narrowly avoided jail for benefit fraud.

Dennen, 57, of York Road, Kingston, dishonestly or fraudulently claimed £3,611 in council tax benefits between January 2008 and June 2010.

He pleaded guilty to seven charges two weeks after May’s local elections, where he had stood as a candidate.

Despite being thrown out of the Liberal Democrats, he continued to represent Canbury as an independent for two years, while Kingston Council carried out a prolonged investigation into his finances.

He also continued to receive the £7,528-a-year councillor’s allowance during that time, before standing for re-election.

Had he been re-elected, Kingston Council could well have had a convicted benefits cheat at Guildhall for the next four years without any recourse for dismissal.

Liberal Democrat leader Councillor Liz Green said: “I absolutely think Tim should have stepped down, and I can’t understand the mentality of running for council again.

"We removed him from the group but we can’t make him step down.

“The only person who can get rid of a councillor is the councillor. We can’t actually do anything.”

Councillors can only be disqualified if they are convicted of a crime which carries a prison sentence of at least three months.

Dennen’s offences carried a maximum jail term of six weeks.

Magistrates in Wimbledon on Friday told Dennen they “seriously considered” jailing him before sentencing him to 200 hours of community service and ordering him to pay £7,000 in costs.

Coun Green said she would support a system of recall similar to the one being fought for in Parliament by north Kingston MP Zac Goldsmith.

She said councillors should be subject to recall if convicted of a crime.

Mr Goldsmith’s proposals go further, allowing constituents to effectively sack their MP if at any point they have lost faith in them.

If, however, an MP is going through legal proceedings, the recall process would be paused until their case is concluded.  

This Is Local London: Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith has been divorced by his wife over his admitted adultery

Zac Goldsmith has been fighting for the power to recall MPs 

Although recall would not have prevented Dennen from seeking re-election, had he won, Canbury ward residents could have launched a petition calling for him to be sacked after his conviction.

Dennen was voted out after polling just 188 votes, finishing in last place.

Mr Goldsmith said: “I strongly believe it should be possible to recall any and all representatives, from the council to the cabinet.

”There is no argument against recall that is not also an argument against democracy itself.”

But Kingston Council leader Kevin Davis was sceptical.

He said: “I think it’s certainly an interesting idea but in reality I’m not sure it would work.

”Giving people the vote is difficult enough, and if you work with the current Recall Bill of 10 per cent of constituents signing a petition to get an MP recalled, you're talking about six or seven hundred people in a local ward.”

What do you think? Leave your comments below or email letters@surreycomet.co.uk

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

7:51am Fri 11 Jul 14

0753waterloo says...

"Giving people the vote is difficult enough"

If it wasn't for those inconvenient voters, we could do whatever we wanted.

With an attitude like this, no wonder the Scrutiny panel got shelved. This council has no interest in the people of Kingston or what they think.
"Giving people the vote is difficult enough" If it wasn't for those inconvenient voters, we could do whatever we wanted. With an attitude like this, no wonder the Scrutiny panel got shelved. This council has no interest in the people of Kingston or what they think. 0753waterloo
  • Score: 6

5:37pm Fri 11 Jul 14

Beverly RA says...

The question is why did the council take years to prosecute ?
The question is why did the council take years to prosecute ? Beverly RA
  • Score: 1

11:06pm Fri 11 Jul 14

&anotherthing says...

If only you, for once, could talk sense! Surely the question is what took the legal system so long..... ? Honestly! We should also be asking what powers the Standards Committee really have if and when any court decision is made for future situations like this. Cllrs who have legal convictions should stand down and not stand for office.
If only you, for once, could talk sense! Surely the question is what took the legal system so long..... ? Honestly! We should also be asking what powers the Standards Committee really have if and when any court decision is made for future situations like this. Cllrs who have legal convictions should stand down and not stand for office. &anotherthing
  • Score: 2
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree