Surrey and Borders NHS Trust under fire after escapes and fatal fall in Epsom

This Is Local London: NHS trust under fire after escapes and fatal fall NHS trust under fire after escapes and fatal fall

An NHS trust has come under fire after two patients with violent pasts detained under the Mental Health Act escaped from one of its wards last week.

Less than two months ago another of its patients, from a different ward on the same site at Epsom Hospital, managed to climb a high chimney nearby before falling to his death.

Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust is now carrying out two internal investigations to establish what can be learnt from last week's escapes and the fatal fall of Adam Withers, 20.

The two absconders got out of the hospital on Wednesday morning without the medication needed to control their mental illnesses.

Despite the men's violent past, a police appeal was not issued until nearly 36 hours later and on Friday the men were captured separately in Aldershot and Dorking thanks to information provided by the public.

Police failed to explain exactly why they held off issuing the appeal, except to say that they evaluate each case carefully, deployed officers immediately and used "every effort" to find the men for 24 hours before deciding to go public on Thursday evening.

Nigel Collin, a concerned father, local resident and chartered accountant, said: "The latest lapse in security beggars belief and cannot be ascribed solely to lack of resources.

"It was precisely this poor housekeeping which allowed Adam to climb the tower. Given that Chris Grayling is the local MP and his position in the coalition, he should be required to obtain a detailed assessment from Jeremy Hunt."

Councillor Neil Dallen, who represents town ward, said he was "disappointed" that the safety and security of the patients and the wider public had been put at risk.

Coun Dallen said: "I would hope they would put some procedures in place to stop it happening again. There’s something wrong in the system for that to happen.

"Once is possibly an accident or human error but more than once means there are not enough procedures and processes in place."

On the timing of the police appeal, he said: "To wait 36 hours seems very slow. I would want to find out why before criticising it too much but on the face of it, it does not seem like a good service to the public.

"An appeal to catch them is also an appeal to be aware, to keep people safe."

Andrew Wills, a long-time resident of Epsom, said the area’s former psychiatric hospitals have now been replaced by smaller mental health wards.

Mr Wills asked: ""Do the authorities look very carefully at which people are suitable for this sort of environment? Are these places meant to be secure? If they are meant to be secure, are they secure? And if not why not?"

Jane Shipp, from health watchdog Healthwatch Surrey, said they were concerned about the trust's "duty of care" to the absconders who had been detained for their own safety.

Ms Shipp said they have asked to be updated on the progress of the NHS trust’s investigation and specified that it must be carried out in a timely manner.

She said: "We have high expectations of a thorough investigation being done and quickly so there can be an understanding of this very soon.

"We would like what happened to come to light as quickly as possible so things can be learnt. We are looking for it to be dealt with quickly and transparently."

She declined to comment on the fatal fall in relation to the abscondment on Wednesday. She said: "He was not detained in a secure way. They are two different sets of circumstances."

On Friday, Andy Erskine, director of mental health and social care at the trust, said: "We would like to thank Surrey Police and the public for their support in locating these two vulnerable men whose wellbeing we were very concerned for.

"We are conducting an internal investigation to establish how the men left the ward to ensure that lessons are learnt to minimise the chances of this happening in the future."

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:20am Thu 3 Jul 14

Hove Ex-Pat says...

The fall & death of the young man, dreadful as it was could have happened anywhere, if not on the hospital site. The young lad was no threat to the public. But putting two "dangerous men" (their words, not mine), in the wards of our local hospital, which is not designed for such serious cases, is a disgracefully dangerous move by hospital & NHS authorities. The Langley Wing is not a secure hospital,. it was not meant for such serious cases. This is just cost cutting by the NHS, but instead it has cost Surrey, & other police, many thousands of pounds. So no public money has actually been saved in the end.
The fall & death of the young man, dreadful as it was could have happened anywhere, if not on the hospital site. The young lad was no threat to the public. But putting two "dangerous men" (their words, not mine), in the wards of our local hospital, which is not designed for such serious cases, is a disgracefully dangerous move by hospital & NHS authorities. The Langley Wing is not a secure hospital,. it was not meant for such serious cases. This is just cost cutting by the NHS, but instead it has cost Surrey, & other police, many thousands of pounds. So no public money has actually been saved in the end. Hove Ex-Pat
  • Score: 3

1:57pm Thu 3 Jul 14

benstead says...

The Langley wing on the Epsom Hospital site has 3 wards for the mental Heath, only 1 is a secure ward, as they have not stated which ward the 2 men were in I can only assume that it was not the secure one, this I'm only assuming.
I agree with Hove Ex-pat that the death of the young man could have happened anywhere, but when the same place flag's up more than once it's not going to go un noticed and it shouldn't.
The Langley wing on the Epsom Hospital site has 3 wards for the mental Heath, only 1 is a secure ward, as they have not stated which ward the 2 men were in I can only assume that it was not the secure one, this I'm only assuming. I agree with Hove Ex-pat that the death of the young man could have happened anywhere, but when the same place flag's up more than once it's not going to go un noticed and it shouldn't. benstead
  • Score: 1

4:22pm Sun 6 Jul 14

bocchereini says...

The death of 20 year old Adam should have been prevented and is a tragedy for his family and friends.

My 20 year old son was in Elgar Ward (within the Langley Wing) - Although patients are locked in the ward most of the time, they have dinner served in a canteen which is not in a locked area. When I visited my son I was concerned that doors outside the canteen in Langley Wing were wide open, making escape from this area potentially quite easy. It is a very worrying situation. During my son's inquest I discovered that just under half the staff employed on the ward were unqualified - am not sure this would be tolerated in any other area of the NHS. Serious errors were made during my son's stay as an inpatient and I am not convinced that enough is being done to tighten up procedures.
The death of 20 year old Adam should have been prevented and is a tragedy for his family and friends. My 20 year old son was in Elgar Ward (within the Langley Wing) - Although patients are locked in the ward most of the time, they have dinner served in a canteen which is not in a locked area. When I visited my son I was concerned that doors outside the canteen in Langley Wing were wide open, making escape from this area potentially quite easy. It is a very worrying situation. During my son's inquest I discovered that just under half the staff employed on the ward were unqualified - am not sure this would be tolerated in any other area of the NHS. Serious errors were made during my son's stay as an inpatient and I am not convinced that enough is being done to tighten up procedures. bocchereini
  • Score: 3
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree