Gravesend Heritage Quarter scheme hit by 'potentially devastating' delay

Gravesend Heritage Quarter scheme hit by 'potentially devastating' delay

The redevelopment of St George's Square could be put on hold.

John Burden has called Urban Gravesham's move "unacceptable".

Gravesham MP Adam Holloway backs the decision to go for judicial review.

First published in News
Last updated
This Is Local London: Photograph of the Author Exclusive by , reporter

The multi-million pound redevelopment of Gravesend’s Heritage Quarter could be put back by another six months in a “potentially devastating” move.

Campaign group Urban Gravesham has taken a last minute decision to take Gravesham Council to the High Court over the £120 million scheme.

The group yesterday sought a judicial review of the decision to go ahead with the plans, which was taken at a contentious planning meeting in April last year.

Gravesham Council leader John Burden told News Shopper: “The effect on the scheme and the town is potentially devastating.

“We have to prove to stores like Marks and Spencer and other big stores that there is a future in this town but there seems to be opposition from Urban Gravesham to anything being done here.

“The review isn’t good news for the developers who were set to start in the autumn. All those homes and jobs are now on hold.

“The other really disappointing thing is the playing politics and the brinkmanship with Gravesham.

“To do it on the very last day and still not even have the good manners to tell the council – the brinkmanship involved in that is unacceptable.”

This Is Local London: The proposed design for the Western Quarter.

The proposed design for the Western Quarter.

The council heard through Heritage Quarter developers Edinburgh House yesterday that Urban Gravesham had lodged papers with the High Court.

It was the group’s final opportunity to do so at the end of the six week deadline following last month’s agreement on £6.6 million worth of Section 106 funding for the project.

Councillor Burden said: “The developer has spent so much money on trying to get this scheme to this stage they might decide, like M&S, that it isn’t worth investing in this town.

“They own the land and we can’t force them to develop it.

“I don’t know how long this delay will take and in the meantime the people of Gravesham will suffer.”

Over the next few weeks a judge will examine Urban Gravesham’s claim and decide whether it has merit.

The group claim planning officers promised councillors at April’s meeting that the regulatory board would take one last look at the decision to go ahead after the extra funding was agreed, but that did not happen.

A council spokesman said the authority is "entirely satisfied" it followed the correct procedures.

This Is Local London: The three areas in Gravesend that are set to be revamped.

The three areas in Gravesend that are set to be revamped.

In the worst case scenario for the council the judge could rule it acted improperly and the scheme could be sent back for another planning committee vote – all of which could take another six months.

The news comes just days after Marks and Spencer announced plans to pull out of Gravesend by closing its store in New Road.

Coun Burden is meeting with representatives of the department store on Tuesday to try and persuade them to stay.

He said: “I have got to try and convince them that this town has a future.”

The Heritage Quarter plans would see the Eastern Quarter, Western Quarter and St Andrew’s Gardens redeveloped to provide 330 homes, a 50-bedroom hotel and dozens of new shops.

A spokesman for Edinburgh House said: “We only found out today (Friday) and it is frustrating and disappointing.

“That said it is very much a claim against the council from Urban Gravesham and it is for the council to defend.

“We are the applicants and an interested party and we have seen nothing untoward in the way Gravesham Council dealt with the application.

This Is Local London: Proposals for the Eastern Quarter.

How the Eastern Quarter development would look.

“If a judge thinks there is not a case then we could be left to get on in just three months but if they believe there to be a case then it could be delayed for more than six months.

“We are confident the council was thorough and diligent in how they dealt with the planning process.

“There is nothing to suggest Urban Gravesham has a claim.”

But Gravesham MP Adam Holloway gave his firm backing to the civic group's move. 

He told News Shopper: "I am very pleased to support it. 

"The Heritage Quarter plans are of a shockingly low quality and they have no popular support it seems from anyone in Gravesham apart from the council and the council officers. 

"The Eastern Quarter, with its minute, mechanically ventilated apartments, will be a blight and they will never build the Western Quarter because it's completely unviable. 

"It is a hideous, low quality development from a time when the town had low aspirations and it's completely out of date what with Ebbsfleet Garden City and Paramount Park coming. 

"It's a shocker and thank God for Urban Gravesham for going in where the political class in this borough has failed miserably to do so." 

An Urban Gravesham spokesman added: “Gravesham Council’s unelected planning officers appear to have lost all accountability for what is a very bad deal for the people of Gravesham.

“The judicial review means the High Court will be able to shine a light into some dark corners of the planning process in Gravesham.”

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:39am Sat 14 Jun 14

gravesendboy says...

I find Councillor Burden's response disingenuous to say the least.
M&S made their decision before the judicial review, it is his short sighted policies for the town that has seen this decision from M&S, which they made it after the planning application was granted.

Additionally I have seen Mr Burden refer to the new garden city of Ebbsfleet and the new Paramount park as a source of visitors to Gravesend. He really is living in cloud cuckoo land. Because of the council's policies over the years there is very little to distinguish Gravesend from any other struggling town centre, why would people come here when they can get so much more from nearby Bluewater.

The council's own reports for the application stated that it would not be financially viable and the council also stated that extending Bluewater (as is now happening) would be the death of for the Heritage Quarter scheme. Yet they still passed it.

Mr Burden needs to stop blaming others for this council's short comings and take some responsibility for the mess he now finds himself in.
I find Councillor Burden's response disingenuous to say the least. M&S made their decision before the judicial review, it is his short sighted policies for the town that has seen this decision from M&S, which they made it after the planning application was granted. Additionally I have seen Mr Burden refer to the new garden city of Ebbsfleet and the new Paramount park as a source of visitors to Gravesend. He really is living in cloud cuckoo land. Because of the council's policies over the years there is very little to distinguish Gravesend from any other struggling town centre, why would people come here when they can get so much more from nearby Bluewater. The council's own reports for the application stated that it would not be financially viable and the council also stated that extending Bluewater (as is now happening) would be the death of for the Heritage Quarter scheme. Yet they still passed it. Mr Burden needs to stop blaming others for this council's short comings and take some responsibility for the mess he now finds himself in. gravesendboy
  • Score: 6

9:33pm Sat 14 Jun 14

motorbiker says...

It's the second time recently that the leader of the council has admitted he does not know what is going on in Gravesend. But that not surprising because i dont believe he cares. First the local labour party would not select him in his quest to become a Kent County Counciilor so he trounced of to Dartford got selected there and then got soundly beaten. It couldn't be the £13000 minimum allowance he was after, of course it was.
Never one to miss a free lunch he goes to America on a jolly to check out theme parks. Perhaps if he had stayed at home he might not miss so much of what is happening in Gravesend.
Is the developer promising to start work this year on the Heritage Quarter the same one that has been saying the same to the people of Castleford since 2008? and last time I checked nothing had been started.
It's the second time recently that the leader of the council has admitted he does not know what is going on in Gravesend. But that not surprising because i dont believe he cares. First the local labour party would not select him in his quest to become a Kent County Counciilor so he trounced of to Dartford got selected there and then got soundly beaten. It couldn't be the £13000 minimum allowance he was after, of course it was. Never one to miss a free lunch he goes to America on a jolly to check out theme parks. Perhaps if he had stayed at home he might not miss so much of what is happening in Gravesend. Is the developer promising to start work this year on the Heritage Quarter the same one that has been saying the same to the people of Castleford since 2008? and last time I checked nothing had been started. motorbiker
  • Score: 5

4:38pm Tue 17 Jun 14

Paxman says...

Hats off to,Adam Holloway for standing up and telling it like it is.

Whereas...... Burden by name, burden by nature has for years now fought tooth-and-nail for this dreadful scheme - in the face of public opposition .

I cannot think why.
Hats off to,Adam Holloway for standing up and telling it like it is. Whereas...... Burden by name, burden by nature has for years now fought tooth-and-nail for this dreadful scheme - in the face of public opposition . I cannot think why. Paxman
  • Score: 0

11:30am Wed 18 Jun 14

Anti-Litter says...

I thank Adam Holloway for making such a bold statement. He is absolutely correct. The whole development is beyond low quality and has no architectural merit that enhances the historical town of Gravesend. Can anybody imagine this rubbish being proposed and passed by Sevenoaks or Tunbridge Wells Borough Council. The developer had the opportunity to revised the project to something of architectural merit and yet decided to simply disguise an alway bad proposal. The project is bulky, bland and a bad throw back to the 60's. I think the Anglesea Centre multi-storey could compete with the Edinburgh House development. Urban Gravesham gets my full support in this one and they deserve to win against a council that is arrogant and out of touch with the majority of the demographic of Gravesham.
I thank Adam Holloway for making such a bold statement. He is absolutely correct. The whole development is beyond low quality and has no architectural merit that enhances the historical town of Gravesend. Can anybody imagine this rubbish being proposed and passed by Sevenoaks or Tunbridge Wells Borough Council. The developer had the opportunity to revised the project to something of architectural merit and yet decided to simply disguise an alway bad proposal. The project is bulky, bland and a bad throw back to the 60's. I think the Anglesea Centre multi-storey could compete with the Edinburgh House development. Urban Gravesham gets my full support in this one and they deserve to win against a council that is arrogant and out of touch with the majority of the demographic of Gravesham. Anti-Litter
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree