Lewisham pervert Andrew Meldrum who spied on women in their homes after hijacking webcams avoids jail

Webcam pervert Andrew Meldrum spied on women in their homes, including when they were naked

Webcam pervert Andrew Meldrum spied on women in their homes, including when they were naked

First published in News
Last updated
This Is Local London: Photograph of the Author by , deputy news editor

A hi-tech peeping Tom from Lewisham, who used secretly installed software to spy on women for his sexual kicks, has walked free from court today (May 30).

Andrew Meldrum, 30, of Crosslet Vale, used the software to remotely hijack his three victims' webcams so he could watch them in their homes.

One of the victims broke down in tears at Woolwich Crown Court as Meldrum was handed suspended sentences for his crimes.

Police began investigating him in November 2012 when one woman, 21, found the spyware and immediately suspected Meldrum, who had helped her with the computer.

Two other women were then alerted to the pervert's actions and discovered the software on their PCs.

Meldrum recorded pictures of his victims during 18 months of spying. Police found 88 images of one woman in her underwear, naked, in the bathroom using the toilet and "in positions of intimacy, both alone and with a boyfriend."

The pervert even kept a picture on his phone of one woman lying naked in her bed.

Meldrum, who had recently moved to Lewisham from Portsmouth, also used his spying to discover one of the victims was considering going to the police, calling her to beg her not to.

Prosecutor James Vine said officers found a "huge number of images" on Meldrum's machine, totalling around 11,000, despite him attempting to wipe his computer before police came.

In mitigation, Shila Whitehead said her client was "extremely remorseful", suffered from paranoia, had been booted off his Goldsmiths course, lost his job and run up £4,000 in gambling debts.

She said of the software: "It was a tool that he used. Unfortunately a tool which had devastating consequences for him."

But Recorder Mark Heywood told Meldrum: "This, in my judgement, was a serious and persistent course of offending."

Meldrum, who was found guilty after trial of two counts of voyeurism in March, was given a 12-month sentence for each, suspended for two years.

He had previously admitted three counts of unauthorised access to a computer and was given six-month suspended sentences for each, to run concurrently.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:10pm Fri 30 May 14

SidcupResident says...

He's not even been given a community sentence or rehabilitation order.

This absolutely ridiculous.

If I were the victims, I'd have the sentence referred for being unduly lenient.

http://www.cps.gov.u
k/legal/s_to_u/undul
y_lenient_sentences/
He's not even been given a community sentence or rehabilitation order. This absolutely ridiculous. If I were the victims, I'd have the sentence referred for being unduly lenient. http://www.cps.gov.u k/legal/s_to_u/undul y_lenient_sentences/ SidcupResident
  • Score: 3

11:14pm Fri 30 May 14

SidcupResident says...

From the link in my previous post:

"How referrals arise

Unduly lenient sentence referrals can arise in a number of ways:

Areas may consider the sentence unduly lenient;
interested parties including victims or the bereaved may contact the CPS;
media coverage may prompt the Area to consider the case;
the Attorney General may also be contacted directly, by MPs, peers, pressure groups or members of the public, or may respond to media coverage. In those cases, the AGO will request papers from the Area with casework responsibility for the case."
From the link in my previous post: "How referrals arise Unduly lenient sentence referrals can arise in a number of ways: Areas may consider the sentence unduly lenient; interested parties including victims or the bereaved may contact the CPS; media coverage may prompt the Area to consider the case; the Attorney General may also be contacted directly, by MPs, peers, pressure groups or members of the public, or may respond to media coverage. In those cases, the AGO will request papers from the Area with casework responsibility for the case." SidcupResident
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree