Boris Johnson 'has blood on his hands' over Woolwich pensioner's fire death

Boris Johnson 'has blood on his hands' over Woolwich pensioner's fire death

The fire broke out at Riverview Heights

Campaigners had fought to keep the fire station open

First published in News
Last updated
This Is Local London: Photograph of the Author by , deputy news editor

Boris Johnson has been accused of having "blood on his hands" after a Woolwich pensioner died following a flat blaze - weeks after his nearest fire station was closed down.

Maurice Cunliffe, aged 83, died in the early hours of February 27, four days after being pulled semi-conscious from a fire in his Riverview Heights flat on Eglinton Hill.

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) say he was forced to wait longer while crews from Eltham, Plumstead and East Greenwich fire stations battled to reach him.

They say firefighters from Woolwich - now closed in a cost-cutting measure - would have taken around six minutes to arrive at the scene.

But on this occasion the first engine arrived 10 minutes after the call-out.
FBU regional secretary Paul Embery said the Mayor of London, who forced through the closure of 10 fire stations, had "blood on his hands".

This Is Local London: Vigil held at Woolwich fire station

He said: "Mr Cunliffe, while suffering from smoke inhalation, was still alive and semi-conscious when crews discovered him, so his chances of being saved would have increased dramatically had he been pulled from the fire two or three minutes earlier.

"We have always said that, for someone trapped in a fire, seconds count, and in this case the extra time it took to reach Mr Cunliffe is likely to have been the difference between life and death."

"We always said that the cuts imposed by Boris Johnson - and supported by his loyal foot soldier in the form of the London Fire Brigade commissioner - were reckless and would cost lives. We take no satisfaction in being proved correct within seven weeks."

London Assembly Member for Greenwich and Lewisham Len Duvall has now written to the Chair of the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA), demanding a full explanation on the impact of the Woolwich closure.

He said: "Less than two months after the closure of Woolwich fire station, we’re now faced with a tragic incident with an increased response time. It isn’t clear at the moment but crucially those two minutes could well have made the difference."

News Shopper asked for a response from the Mayor’s Office but were instead directed to the London Fire Brigade.

A brigade spokeswoman said: "The fire was most likely caused by a halogen heater that had been placed too close to flammable materials.

"It appears that there was no smoke alarm in the flat and so it is likely that the fire was smouldering for some time before the Brigade were alerted. 

"Eglinton Hill is situated on the border of the areas covered by Plumstead and East Greenwich fire stations. At the time of the fire, mobilising systems were unavailable at Plumstead and crews from East Greenwich and Eltham fire stations were sent.

"They arrived in 7.42 and 9.05 minutes respectively, shortly followed by both fire engines from Plumstead who were also then ordered to the scene.  As a result, a total of 21 firefighters and officers attended  this emergency incident."

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

7:55pm Mon 3 Mar 14

Hatersgonnahate says...

Andrew Parkes the NS editor wrote this article welcoming cuts to the fire service.

http://www.newsshopp
er.co.uk/news/100202
79.Firefighters_must
_live_in_the_real_wo
rld_too__Editor_s_Ey
e_comment/?ref=mc

The closing statement states....

'Exactly what cuts should be made is not a matter for us, such decisions will be taken by the politicians we have elected, but that firefighters are forced to cut costs, reduce waste and make necessary redundancies, just like the rest of us have been forced to do, can only be right and proper.'

Can he confirm or deny if he still feels the closure of Woolwich Fire Station in his own words '...right and proper'?
Andrew Parkes the NS editor wrote this article welcoming cuts to the fire service. http://www.newsshopp er.co.uk/news/100202 79.Firefighters_must _live_in_the_real_wo rld_too__Editor_s_Ey e_comment/?ref=mc The closing statement states.... 'Exactly what cuts should be made is not a matter for us, such decisions will be taken by the politicians we have elected, but that firefighters are forced to cut costs, reduce waste and make necessary redundancies, just like the rest of us have been forced to do, can only be right and proper.' Can he confirm or deny if he still feels the closure of Woolwich Fire Station in his own words '...right and proper'? Hatersgonnahate
  • Score: -12

10:27pm Tue 4 Mar 14

Hatersgonnahate says...

http://www.london.fb
u.org.uk/wp-content/
uploads/2014/03/Maur
ice-Cunliffe.pdf
http://www.london.fb u.org.uk/wp-content/ uploads/2014/03/Maur ice-Cunliffe.pdf Hatersgonnahate
  • Score: -12

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree