Former council employee ordered to pay £117k after council discrimination claim rejected

This Is Local London: Man who unsuccessfully took council to tribunal ordered to pay record costs Man who unsuccessfully took council to tribunal ordered to pay record costs

An “unscrupulous” former council employee who unsuccessfully took Waltham Forest Council to an employment tribunal has been ordered to pay record legal costs.

David Makanjuola, who worked as an environmental health enforcement officer for the authority for almost 20 years, made 69 separate allegations against the authority.

He claimed unfair dismissal, discrimination and harassment because of race and disability.

But when the tribunal unanimously rejected all claims the council successfully applied to be reimbursed for legal costs of £117,000.

The highest cost previously awarded to an individual was £83,000, according to the council’s law firm, Ely Place Chambers.

Explaining his decision, which Mr Makanjuola is appealing against, Employment Judge Ferris said: “When a large organisation (like the respondent) faces elaborately organised claims, presented by an extremely intelligent and unscrupulous litigant like the claimant, it is very much more difficult to defend than it is when a claimant is merely inefficient and clumsy.

“We accept that the cost to the respondent must, for these reasons, have been unusual and excessive.”

Mr Makanjuola worked for the council from Feb 23 1992 until his dismissal, which the council said was for gross misconduct, on March 21 2011.

The issue has been ongoing since he first appealed the dismissal in April 2011.

Councillor Mark Rusling, cabinet member for economic development and corporate resources, said: “After two years of unnecessary time and costs we’re ecstatic with the result achieved by our in-house legal service and the fact that our full costs have been awarded.

“As a council we do not tolerate discrimination against any member of staff. All claims of this nature are taken seriously but where we know a claim is unfounded we will have no hesitation in vigorously defending the council’s position and recovering our costs, which is, at the end of the day, public money.”

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:06pm Mon 10 Feb 14

mdj says...

'Mr Makanjuola worked for the council from Feb 23 1992 until his dismissal, which the council said was for gross misconduct, on March 21 2011. '

Nineteen years is a lot of misconduct; it's hard to know whether our council has played a blinder here in fighting off this claim, or took ages to do the right thing.
Congratulations seem to be in order for holding firm, though.

I wonder how this will be reported in WF News?
'Mr Makanjuola worked for the council from Feb 23 1992 until his dismissal, which the council said was for gross misconduct, on March 21 2011. ' Nineteen years is a lot of misconduct; it's hard to know whether our council has played a blinder here in fighting off this claim, or took ages to do the right thing. Congratulations seem to be in order for holding firm, though. I wonder how this will be reported in WF News? mdj

3:25pm Mon 10 Feb 14

Villagecranberry says...

Good on the council, too many play the race card for monetary purposes when they are utterly incompetent and unfit for the job.
Good on the council, too many play the race card for monetary purposes when they are utterly incompetent and unfit for the job. Villagecranberry

5:41pm Mon 10 Feb 14

myopinioncounts says...

An employee at my son's company was always playing the race card to avoid accusations of misconduct and the managers were too afraid to challenge him. One day he went into the office to find that the new manager was also black and he told him in no uncertain terms that playing the 'race card' would no longer work!
An employee at my son's company was always playing the race card to avoid accusations of misconduct and the managers were too afraid to challenge him. One day he went into the office to find that the new manager was also black and he told him in no uncertain terms that playing the 'race card' would no longer work! myopinioncounts

10:50am Tue 11 Feb 14

G_Whiz says...

I suppose, if we all thought we could get away with it, we all would give it a go! - This fella obviously pushed it a little too far!

No matter how far a council can fast track someone, bend over backwards for them and be ruthlessly P.C. They must have some limits?. Took their time to realise though!

Employ the best person for the Job. Any discrimination, either positive or negative is bad for everyone.
I suppose, if we all thought we could get away with it, we all would give it a go! - This fella obviously pushed it a little too far! No matter how far a council can fast track someone, bend over backwards for them and be ruthlessly P.C. They must have some limits?. Took their time to realise though! Employ the best person for the Job. Any discrimination, either positive or negative is bad for everyone. G_Whiz

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree