Local Government Association asks for new rules to stop clustering of betting shops in town centres

Councillor Clyde Loakes with residents outside a William Hill store

Councillor Clyde Loakes with residents outside a William Hill store

First published in News
Last updated
This Is Local London: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter - Waltham Forest

Councils leaders across London are calling for tougher licensing powers to protect high streets from a 'blight' of betting shops.

The Local Government Assocation (LGA) said rules needed changing in England and Wales to prevent bookmakers being 'clustered' in town centres.

 Existing 'restrictive' planning and licensing rules do not allow councils to act on the concerns expressed by members of the local community claims the LGA.

The LGA, which represents 370 councils, said local authorities were "left powerless" when it came to limiting the number of shops opening in a given area.

According to changes in planning laws introduced last year, it has become easier for betting shops to convert existing buidings without the need for planning permission.

In order to take control of the issue, the government must allow councils to assess the negative impact of local economic growth or existing businesses.

The LGA said the number of betting shops in some parts of London had doubled in the past decade.

Tony Page of the LGA licensing committee said:

"Councils aren't anti-bookies but need powers to tackle the damage that can be caused to high streets and town centres by the clustering of betting shops.

"Planning and licensing controls are supposed to ensure new shops or business will benefit an area but the current system is preventing councils from acting on community concerns.

"The result is many of our high streets becoming saturated with betting shops and councils left powerless to act to limit the number opening up in their area.

"Licensing laws must be updated to allow councils to consider the impact a new betting shop would have on their local economy and existing businesses.

"This would protect the power of local communities and democratically-elected councillors to shape their area.

In response to a wave of applications to open betting shops across Waltham Forest, deputy leader and cabinet member for environment councillor Clyde Loakes aims to launch a public-led campaign.

He claims residents no longer want high streets "clogged" with bookies. He also says the number of bookmakers in Waltham Forest has increased by a third in the past five years.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:32pm Sun 2 Feb 14

cynicalsue says...

Why did Loakes and Co. not have this kind of campaign to stop us being 'blighted' by chicken shops?
Why did Loakes and Co. not have this kind of campaign to stop us being 'blighted' by chicken shops? cynicalsue
  • Score: 5

10:08pm Sun 2 Feb 14

Villagecranberry says...

cynicalsue wrote:
Why did Loakes and Co. not have this kind of campaign to stop us being 'blighted' by chicken shops?
Why did. Loakes not make a stance when his own party (New Labour, under now Multi- Millionaire Tony Bliar) deregulated the legislation under 'Gambling will be fun' Tessa Jowells? Like yo say, what is worse the chicken or the egg?
The toxic cancers of fun, as addictive as heroin have ruined lives of families up and down the Country, it is an absolute absurdity that Loakes is now banging the drum of this cause trying to close the stable door when the horse has bolted.
[quote][p][bold]cynicalsue[/bold] wrote: Why did Loakes and Co. not have this kind of campaign to stop us being 'blighted' by chicken shops?[/p][/quote]Why did. Loakes not make a stance when his own party (New Labour, under now Multi- Millionaire Tony Bliar) deregulated the legislation under 'Gambling will be fun' Tessa Jowells? Like yo say, what is worse the chicken or the egg? The toxic cancers of fun, as addictive as heroin have ruined lives of families up and down the Country, it is an absolute absurdity that Loakes is now banging the drum of this cause trying to close the stable door when the horse has bolted. Villagecranberry
  • Score: -3

10:20pm Sun 2 Feb 14

Techno3 says...

Villagecranberry wrote:
cynicalsue wrote:
Why did Loakes and Co. not have this kind of campaign to stop us being 'blighted' by chicken shops?
Why did. Loakes not make a stance when his own party (New Labour, under now Multi- Millionaire Tony Bliar) deregulated the legislation under 'Gambling will be fun' Tessa Jowells? Like yo say, what is worse the chicken or the egg?
The toxic cancers of fun, as addictive as heroin have ruined lives of families up and down the Country, it is an absolute absurdity that Loakes is now banging the drum of this cause trying to close the stable door when the horse has bolted.
It is the height of hypocracy for the Labour Party, which created this mess, to go round complaining that there are no powers to deal with it.

The entire point of Tessa Jowell's 2005 Gambling Act was to make sure the Labour Party's friends in the gambling industry would be able to fill their boots with the minimum of democratic scrutiny and control.
[quote][p][bold]Villagecranberry[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]cynicalsue[/bold] wrote: Why did Loakes and Co. not have this kind of campaign to stop us being 'blighted' by chicken shops?[/p][/quote]Why did. Loakes not make a stance when his own party (New Labour, under now Multi- Millionaire Tony Bliar) deregulated the legislation under 'Gambling will be fun' Tessa Jowells? Like yo say, what is worse the chicken or the egg? The toxic cancers of fun, as addictive as heroin have ruined lives of families up and down the Country, it is an absolute absurdity that Loakes is now banging the drum of this cause trying to close the stable door when the horse has bolted.[/p][/quote]It is the height of hypocracy for the Labour Party, which created this mess, to go round complaining that there are no powers to deal with it. The entire point of Tessa Jowell's 2005 Gambling Act was to make sure the Labour Party's friends in the gambling industry would be able to fill their boots with the minimum of democratic scrutiny and control. Techno3
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree