Boris Island north Kent airport plans dealt a blow

This Is Local London: A computer generated image of how a new airport in the Isle of Grain could look (image by Foster and Partners). A computer generated image of how a new airport in the Isle of Grain could look (image by Foster and Partners).

AIRPORT plans for north Kent have been knocked back in a report published this morning.

The independent Airports Commission’s Interim Report said the south east would need one new runway by 2030 and is likely to need a second by 2050.

None of the ideas for a Thames Estuary hub – including 'Boris Island', championed by London Mayor Boris Johnson – were included in the three-strong shortlist, though more analysis will be made into an Isle of Grain airport option early next year.

The three options being pursued by the commission, led by aviation tsar Sir Howard Davies, include one proposal at Gatwick and two at Heathrow.

The report said: “The Thames Estuary airport options were not at this stage shortlisted.

“While the potential they offered to reduce aviation noise impacts in the South East of England and to support economic development on the eastern side of London was attractive, they presented many challenges and uncertainties.”

The commission noted the estuary options would be the most expensive with the cost of an Isle of Grain airport around five times that of the other three shortlisted at up to £112 billion.

The report also acknowledged the "major environmental issues" a north Kent airport would present and the substantial infrastructure that would be required should it go ahead.

An Estuary airport would also have knock-on effects for other airports, the report said, forcing the closure of Heathrow for commercial reasons and London City of airspace reasons.

Further analysis will be carried out at the Isle of Grain in the first half of next year to see whether it is a credible proposal to be pursued with the other three.

Sir Howard Davies said the commission hopes to deliver a final recommendation to the government in 2015.

The Secretary of State for Transport, Patrick McLoughlin, will make an oral statement to Parliament today.

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:53am Tue 17 Dec 13

molsey says...

Remember just before the last election when labour was in power, the additional runway at Heathrow was permitted to go ahead after a 2 year public inquiry. But Cameron saw votes from the mass of adjoining southern counties in declaring he would scrap if he got in, and he did both.
Now how much will it cost the public purse to go all through it again, but Dave has scheduled that for after the next election, another not-in-the-public-in
terest political move?
Remember just before the last election when labour was in power, the additional runway at Heathrow was permitted to go ahead after a 2 year public inquiry. But Cameron saw votes from the mass of adjoining southern counties in declaring he would scrap if he got in, and he did both. Now how much will it cost the public purse to go all through it again, but Dave has scheduled that for after the next election, another not-in-the-public-in terest political move? molsey

2:43pm Tue 17 Dec 13

white rabbit9 says...

molsey wrote:
Remember just before the last election when labour was in power, the additional runway at Heathrow was permitted to go ahead after a 2 year public inquiry. But Cameron saw votes from the mass of adjoining southern counties in declaring he would scrap if he got in, and he did both.
Now how much will it cost the public purse to go all through it again, but Dave has scheduled that for after the next election, another not-in-the-public-in

terest political move?
They always get what they want. The agenda always gets what it want's if it's not the conservative's who bring it in then it will be labour who gets it in. Smoke and mirrors. The agenda pushes on.
[quote][p][bold]molsey[/bold] wrote: Remember just before the last election when labour was in power, the additional runway at Heathrow was permitted to go ahead after a 2 year public inquiry. But Cameron saw votes from the mass of adjoining southern counties in declaring he would scrap if he got in, and he did both. Now how much will it cost the public purse to go all through it again, but Dave has scheduled that for after the next election, another not-in-the-public-in terest political move?[/p][/quote]They always get what they want. The agenda always gets what it want's if it's not the conservative's who bring it in then it will be labour who gets it in. Smoke and mirrors. The agenda pushes on. white rabbit9

11:18am Wed 18 Dec 13

Gypo.Joe says...

white rabbit9 wrote:
molsey wrote:
Remember just before the last election when labour was in power, the additional runway at Heathrow was permitted to go ahead after a 2 year public inquiry. But Cameron saw votes from the mass of adjoining southern counties in declaring he would scrap if he got in, and he did both.
Now how much will it cost the public purse to go all through it again, but Dave has scheduled that for after the next election, another not-in-the-public-in


terest political move?
They always get what they want. The agenda always gets what it want's if it's not the conservative's who bring it in then it will be labour who gets it in. Smoke and mirrors. The agenda pushes on.
I really don't understand why you just don't take an OD. You would be better suited to the user name Mr Negative if you intend staying in the land of the living.
[quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]molsey[/bold] wrote: Remember just before the last election when labour was in power, the additional runway at Heathrow was permitted to go ahead after a 2 year public inquiry. But Cameron saw votes from the mass of adjoining southern counties in declaring he would scrap if he got in, and he did both. Now how much will it cost the public purse to go all through it again, but Dave has scheduled that for after the next election, another not-in-the-public-in terest political move?[/p][/quote]They always get what they want. The agenda always gets what it want's if it's not the conservative's who bring it in then it will be labour who gets it in. Smoke and mirrors. The agenda pushes on.[/p][/quote]I really don't understand why you just don't take an OD. You would be better suited to the user name Mr Negative if you intend staying in the land of the living. Gypo.Joe

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree