Plans to build housing for homeless youngters in Epsom town centre approved by councillors

Epsom's councillors approved a planning application to re-develop the above site, in East Street, Epsom, into housing for homeless youngsters Epsom's councillors approved a planning application to re-develop the above site, in East Street, Epsom, into housing for homeless youngsters

A £5m plan to build housing for homeless youngsters, which residents have slammed as a "cocktail for disaster", was approved by councillors yesterday.

Epsom Council’s planning committee voted 7-4 in favour of an application by Sanctuary Supported Living to build a "young persons’ support and accommodation facility" in East Street, Epsom.

Vacant office building Shaftesbury House will be demolished and redeveloped to create 45 single-person flats, for youngsters aged 16 to 25 who are homeless or in need of housing in Epsom and Ewell and who want to turn their lives around with the help of training and support.

Computer-generated images of the finished development were presented at the meeting, showing it would have a modern, young person’s feel with a coloured facade, consisting of red brick and white, green, blue and red panelling.

Worried residents have said the development would have a negative impact on the community - including creating anti-social behaviour, noise and disruption, causing traffic and parking problems, and decreasing property values in the area, and have questioned the amount of public consultation conducted by Sanctuary.

The result of the vote was met with a stony silence in the council chamber’s public gallery.

In a lively debate, councillors considered the four main issues raised by the application - loss of employment land; the design of the proposed development; concerns of crime, safety and anti-social behaviour; and parking access and traffic. 

Councillor Anna Jones: "There is a real problem with empty office building space in the area. 

"It would be marvellous if someone like Saga or Bupa took them but they are just not going to do that."

She added: "We must not clutch at straws. 

"We can’t use the design as a reason to refuse something because we don’t like the whole project. 

"There is no distinct style in East Street, it’s uninteresting and grotty.  It’s quite a brave design for Epsom and it would be a landmark."

But Councillor Ian Booker asked "what’s driving the need for this 45-room development?"

Councillor Clive Smitheram said the planning committee faced a "massive dilemma".

He said: "We know there is a need for housing in the borough. 

"We all need to start somewhere and there are people who need a leg-up who need a start in life and they need to be supported." 

Councillor David Wood added: "We haven’t had a recession this bad in 80 years and it won’t go on forever, and if we give up our office space we won’t have places for employment in the borough in five or six years’ time."

Councillor Mike Teasdale said: "It will be an advantage to East Street, there isn’t anything else there which makes you smile and I think it’s design is acceptable in 2013."

Councillor Sheila Carlson said she had been "saddened" by the comments made about the proposed development.

She said: "There have been an awful lot of comments and there is a perception that it will lead to crime and anti-social behaviour.  Some of it I find particularly worrying and appalling.

"If the youngsters show any signs of anti-social behaviour their tenancy will be in jeopardy. 

"Just because it will have young people in it that will not automatically mean they will be drug addicts and hooligans. 

"It isn’t the case that people living in this development will be any more likely to show signs of drug and drink problems than young people at university campuses or any other areas with young people.

"The perceptions that it will cause trouble are erroneous and I was very saddened to hear people feel that way."     
 

Comments(5)

cynical me says...
8:54am Sun 17 Mar 13

build this and watch the crime rate soar.

muggings, drugs drunken behaviour.

Think of all the teenage mums this will create with the feckless inbreeding they will all do. innit bruv safe.

Build this and Epsom will be just as bad as redhill.

DavidBurr says...
11:43am Sun 17 Mar 13

45 flats on a site if this size? 3 car parking spaces? Overdevelopment and underprovisioned. What a bunch of short sighted and inconsiderate councillors we have. I bet Sanctuary housing can't beleive their luck.

JackDee says...
12:01pm Sun 17 Mar 13

@ Councillor Sheila Carlson - Sanctuary Group FINALLY admitted that these individuals that you are so eager to defend were very likely to have alcohol and drug addictions and come from broken homes.

There is no ‘perception’ involved in the debate… It was made very clear who will be lodging in the property and what their background will be…

Everyone agrees these individuals need help but putting 45 inhabitants from the same social background all together, is not what I would call creating a safe and stable environment.

Furthermore, comparing this situation to Uni students who now have to pay +- £9,000 to get through their studies; who although enjoy partying and having fun do actually have to get up in the morning to study/ go to lectures/seminars is ridiculous yet nothing less than I’d expect from you or the other councillors who voted for the development to go ahead.

Sanctuary Group are only allocating one employee to supervise the property at night. Even back in my time at university there was 1 warden per accommodation block (15 students per block might) to act in a supervisory role - this was hard enough to monitor so how Sanctuary feel that one member of staff is going to have the capability to control 45 unemployed individuals who suddenly have nice lodgings and free to come and go as they wish is beyond me…

And FYI (although you are fully aware of this being Cllr), Sanctuary made it very clear that even IF inhabitants used drugs or alcohol this wouldn't necessarily mean their tenancy would be terminated.

@ Cllr Mike Teasdale - Who on earth do you think is going to be 'smiling' once the place is fully inhabited and crime has risen by over 150%...?? (statistics don't lie). The local residents who can't park in their streets at night because the sanctuary have only provided 4 parking spaces for inhabitants/visitors
..? or the local residents whose cars/houses have been broken into..?
Epsom & Ewell council have referred to developing Epsom as a whole, but what business in their right mind is going to want to move into any of the offices located next to this development…?

Angela M says...
2:14pm Thu 21 Mar 13

Putting 45 emotionally fragile individuals in the same tower block has previously been shown to cause problems.

This is how slums start - a nice purpose-built building, and the best intentions of providing homes for those who need it. A few years down the line and the area goes downhill and the other local residents will avoid this area. I'm worried for the nearby shops, because those of us with some disposable income may be driven away.

Even if these young people want to change, they are likely to come from a difficult background so may have ingrained habits. If they start hanging around on the street swearing and smoking, those of us wishing to protect young children would naturally stay away completely.

ianborn1973 says...
11:48am Mon 25 Mar 13

As usual Epsom and Ewell Council does want it wants. It does not listen to its residents and all it does it looks to line its own pockets.

Look at the state of Epsom Town Centre, declining shops, increasing charity shops and increasing Parking fees because thats going to attract customers. Not to forget the lovely building either side of the station.

I grew up in Epsom and Ewell and they were both lovely places but now after 40 years i am looking to move away, something i did'nt want to do but with a counci thats lost touch and does'nt care about its residents. - Just look rising council tax this year by 2% but delivering a year on year worse service, i really love a comment from the counci lwhere this 2% is going? maybe senior councillers pay rises?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree