Merton Council plan to "increase parking" by blocking bays with bike racks

This Is Local London: Ryan Marfleet with members of staff  Mike Lount and Eamon Murphy Ryan Marfleet with members of staff Mike Lount and Eamon Murphy

The council is proposing to “increase parking provision” in a road by blocking eight spaces at a business with a single bay and bike racks.

Ryan Marfleet, who opened Schmidt Kitchens in Wimbledon in February 2012 and uses eight forecourt parking spaces which are included in his lease, was stunned by Merton Council’s plans to introduce an on-street parking bay and a row of 11 bike racks running across his forecourt.

Despite the forecourt providing free parking for customers and staff at the premises for the past 30 years, the council said they were not legitimate bays and Mr Marfleet had no right to park on his own forecourt.

Mr Marfleet said: “The additional parking bay in the road will have a major impact, but the 11 bike stands is a nail in the coffin.

“Our staff and customers won’t be able to park and ultimately it will force us out of business in a very short time.

“The council should be supporting local business.

“I can’t understand the motivation behind their proposal at all.”

Brigitte Birch, who runs the London Pottery Company in Kingston Road, described parking enforcement in the area as “tyrannical”.

She said: “By putting these unreasonable parking restrictions everywhere it has stopped businesses functioning in the area.

“The council is adding to the problem rather than taking it away.”

Conservative Abbey Ward councillors, Diane Neil Mills and Henry Nelless, have both spoken out against the plans with Coun Nelless calling it “spiteful”.

Councillor Andrew Judge, cabinet member for environmental sustainability and regeneration, defended the plan.

He said: “We have written to Mr Marfleet to let him know there is no right of way for cars on the forecourt outside his shop and that it is illegal to drive on the pavement. 

“We understand that there is a shortage of parking space in the area and are looking at how we might increase parking provision in Kingston Road. 

“With the help of local businesses, we will also be reviewing parking in shopping areas across the borough.”

The final decision will rest with Coun Judge following consideration of responses from the
consultation.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

12:06pm Thu 21 Feb 13

Mordenman says...

Good to see that Merton Council is joining forces with the coalition and the bankers to destroy local businesses.
Good to see that Merton Council is joining forces with the coalition and the bankers to destroy local businesses. Mordenman

12:37pm Thu 21 Feb 13

Jon_events says...

Lucky that his staff/customers who have parked there for 30 years haven't been fined for driving on the pavement.

Be interesting to know how many people drive to the shop, or walk in to browse and then get stuff delivered. Or return to pick up things.

Very good initiative by Merton Council in my opinion.
Lucky that his staff/customers who have parked there for 30 years haven't been fined for driving on the pavement. Be interesting to know how many people drive to the shop, or walk in to browse and then get stuff delivered. Or return to pick up things. Very good initiative by Merton Council in my opinion. Jon_events

11:02pm Thu 21 Feb 13

Tobermory says...

How can his customers have been parking there for 30 years the shop was only recently opened, maybe he should have looked into vehicle access before moving in? I assume since he has no drop kerb access he is also willing to pay for any damage to the footway caused by his customers and also pay damages to anyone hit by a car illegally driving across the pavement? I'm also confused how his customers are meant to use this 'free' parking when the adjacent road has pay and display bays along it which already block access?
How can his customers have been parking there for 30 years the shop was only recently opened, maybe he should have looked into vehicle access before moving in? I assume since he has no drop kerb access he is also willing to pay for any damage to the footway caused by his customers and also pay damages to anyone hit by a car illegally driving across the pavement? I'm also confused how his customers are meant to use this 'free' parking when the adjacent road has pay and display bays along it which already block access? Tobermory

2:26pm Sat 23 Feb 13

tjames says...

JUDGE
JUDGE tjames

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree