One-month-old Bromley baby has finger torn off by fox
9:48pm Saturday 9th February 2013 in News By News reporter
A ONE-MONTH-OLD baby boy had his finger torn off by a fox in Bromley.
The animal tore the infant's finger off after dragging him from his cot after entering his bedroom, according to reports.
A police spokesman said: "We were called at 4.38pm on Wednesday by staff at St Thomas's Hospital to reports a baby boy who had been admitted to hospital after being attacked by a fox.
"Police attended to find a four-week-old baby with a hand injury.
"The baby was admitted to hospital after the attack at its home address.
"Inquiries continue."
The child's mother was alerted by his screaming and rushed into his room to see his hand lodged "halfway down the animal's throat", the Mail on Sunday said.
Surgeons were able to reattach the baby's finger and he was said to be recovering well.
An RSPCA spokeswoman said the only reason a fox would attack is due to fear.
She added: "It's extremely unusual for foxes to attack young children or anyone.
It's not typical fox behaviour at all - foxes will come closer to a house if there are food sources.
Then they can become quite bold, but they usually do back off and run away when there's people around."
London Mayor Boris Johnson said more must be done to tackle the growing problem of urban foxes.
He told BBC News: "They may appear cuddly and romantic but foxes are also a pest and a menace, particularly in our cities.
"This must serve as a wake-up call to London's borough leaders, who are responsible for pest control."
Mr Johnson also said his thoughts were "with the baby boy and his family".
Do you know the boy? Email awoods@london.newsquest.co.uk.
Comments(73)
angelsden
says...
2:02am Sun 10 Feb 13
Witchkid
says...
7:46am Sun 10 Feb 13
ripnetuk
says...
9:08am Sun 10 Feb 13
SimonEvrim15
says...
9:11am Sun 10 Feb 13
Marty1979
says...
9:14am Sun 10 Feb 13
The article has been updated to match the one on the nationals, originally the fox had dragged the baby out of his cot
Wonder where in Bromley, was it near woods?
Inspirationalady28
says...
9:18am Sun 10 Feb 13
Chrisbitz
says...
9:48am Sun 10 Feb 13
Oldchap
says...
10:33am Sun 10 Feb 13
Lucky the baby didn't suffer more injuries as it fell over the sides (most cot sides are about a metre high)
And wonder why they went all the way to St Thomas' as surely they could have got to the PRU much quicker?
reasonable75
says...
11:00am Sun 10 Feb 13
Oldchap wrote:In a report on BBC it quotes a London Ambulance spokesman, so maybe she called 999 & was taken to St Thomases
Poor baby - but it must have been a large fox to climb into the cot, drag the baby up over the sides then along the floor
Lucky the baby didn't suffer more injuries as it fell over the sides (most cot sides are about a metre high)
And wonder why they went all the way to St Thomas' as surely they could have got to the PRU much quicker?
But it does seem a long way
And if this happened last week why has it only just been reported
Marty1979
says...
11:55am Sun 10 Feb 13
Why do people wait for the council to do everything, couldn't they have made a temporary repair themselves
suejon
says...
12:14pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Cllr Colin Smith
says...
12:22pm Sun 10 Feb 13
This happened in LB Lewisham
Marty1979
says...
12:46pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Doesn't look much wrong with the back door. If it was the catch or lock broken then they could easily have put something to keep it shut
http://www.dailymail
.co.uk/news/article-
2276187/Fox-bites-ba
bys-finger-sleeps-Mo
ther-fights-animal-b
edroom-finding-month
-olds-hand-halfway-t
hroat.html#axzz2KUdQ
mfaT
reasonable75
says...
12:59pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Simon bald
says...
1:34pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Inspirationalady28 wrote:So my previous comment was removed.how about this one then, how dare you question the report of it being a fox attack and imply a family pet may be involved.a troll of the highest order and one that is on the newsshoppers payroll.disgusting
I heard that the Mother tried to get the fox off the baby by dragging/kicking it, surely she must have received some injuries too...and so "inquiries continue"? Something doesn't seem to add up...! I expect they'll be carrying out DNA testing to find out if it was a fox or other canine relative?
reasonable75
says...
1:38pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Gypo.Joe
says...
2:01pm Sun 10 Feb 13
1 ......Council tenants !
2 .....Did the Staffy do it ?
I rest my case m'lud.
Marty1979
says...
2:15pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Simon bald wrote:Perhaps your previous comment was deleted because it broke rules (insulting)
Inspirationalady28 wrote:So my previous comment was removed.how about this one then, how dare you question the report of it being a fox attack and imply a family pet may be involved.a troll of the highest order and one that is on the newsshoppers payroll.disgusting
I heard that the Mother tried to get the fox off the baby by dragging/kicking it, surely she must have received some injuries too...and so "inquiries continue"? Something doesn't seem to add up...! I expect they'll be carrying out DNA testing to find out if it was a fox or other canine relative?
And your comments suggest you know more than in the papers, in fact you are the first one to mention the family pet
Gypo.Joe
says...
2:33pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Is this how 'they' bought you off Lou ?
cheap cheap cheap.
Oldchap
says...
2:37pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Slonik
says...
2:39pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Mike Honcho
says...
2:45pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Cllr Colin Smith
says...
2:54pm Sun 10 Feb 13
____________________
____________________
From: Sky.Today
Sent: 10 February 2013 14:32
To: Smith, Colin, Cllr
Subject: RE: Fox article
Dear Cllr Smith,
We’ve checked the land registry for the address this incident took place and it is recorded as Bromley, Lewisham. We understand it is in the Lewisham Borough, but the emergency services all said they responded to a call in the Bromley area, so we do not intend to change our report.
Thanks,
Hazel Baker
Sky News home desk
0207 032 4411
From: Smith, Colin, Cllr
Sent: 10 February 2013 14:08
To: Sky.Today
Cc:
Subject: Fox article
Importance: High
Guys
Why are you continuing to incorrectly promote this incident as having happened in Bromley.
I was with you crew 2 ½ hours ago and know, they know, it happened in LEWISHAM as I was standing beside
Them when they received to call to breakaway and go to visit ‘the neighbour’.
Would you please correct this report ASAP.
Cllr Colin P Smith
Deputy Leader
London Borough of Bromley
zampa
says...
3:42pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Cllr Colin Smith wrote:Cllr Smith, who cares. The kiddy was hurt, fact. My mother comes under Bromley postcode but, is a Lewisham resident, so stop nit picking. Work with Lewisham Council to cut down or rid the foxes.
Just by way of an update ...
____________________
____________________
From: Sky.Today
Sent: 10 February 2013 14:32
To: Smith, Colin, Cllr
Subject: RE: Fox article
Dear Cllr Smith,
We’ve checked the land registry for the address this incident took place and it is recorded as Bromley, Lewisham. We understand it is in the Lewisham Borough, but the emergency services all said they responded to a call in the Bromley area, so we do not intend to change our report.
Thanks,
Hazel Baker
Sky News home desk
0207 032 4411
From: Smith, Colin, Cllr
Sent: 10 February 2013 14:08
To: Sky.Today
Cc:
Subject: Fox article
Importance: High
Guys
Why are you continuing to incorrectly promote this incident as having happened in Bromley.
I was with you crew 2 ½ hours ago and know, they know, it happened in LEWISHAM as I was standing beside
Them when they received to call to breakaway and go to visit ‘the neighbour’.
Would you please correct this report ASAP.
Cllr Colin P Smith
Deputy Leader
London Borough of Bromley
Oldchap
says...
3:52pm Sun 10 Feb 13
the wall
says...
4:05pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Something more to this I reckon.
How did they get the finger back?
Is this person fit to be a mother, if she can't even keep her back doors shut?
What will happen when the baby starts crawling / walking?
Marty1979
says...
4:12pm Sun 10 Feb 13
"She was fighting with it, trying to pull it away from the baby. She said it lasted a couple of minutes and she had to wrestle the fox off the baby."
Wrestle? In previous accounts she kicked it. If she wrestled with it then as in other comments she must have been injured so as well as trying to eat a baby it has attacked an adult
And if neighbours heard screaming why did none go to help?
the wall
says...
4:23pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Properly thought her back doors were being sorted out.
From the Daily Fail:
Khadine Peters, 36, who lives next door to the house where the fox attack happened, said: 'I heard screams, but I didn't think anything of it.........
Sounds like screams often came from the house.
Simon bald
says...
4:31pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Marty1979
says...
4:31pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Cllr Colin Smith wrote:
Just by way of an update ...
____________________
____________________
From: Sky.Today
Sent: 10 February 2013 14:32
To: Smith, Colin, Cllr
Subject: RE: Fox article
Dear Cllr Smith,
We’ve checked the land registry for the address this incident took place and it is recorded as Bromley, Lewisham. We understand it is in the Lewisham Borough, but the emergency services all said they responded to a call in the Bromley area, so we do not intend to change our report.
Thanks,
Hazel Baker
Sky News home deskIt's not nit picking - reports say Bromley. To me that means Bromley town or Borough
Even if an address has a BR postcode that does not make it Bromley - BR5 is Orpington but BR7 is Swanley, Kent and in Sevenoaks council area
If this lady lives in Downham or Bellingham or Grove Park the Cllr Smith is quite right in asking for accuracy
Inspirationalady28
says...
5:07pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Simon bald wrote:I beg your pardon? I'm no way connected to NS! I'm just seeing it how the Authorities will be..
Inspirationalady28 wrote:So my previous comment was removed.how about this one then, how dare you question the report of it being a fox attack and imply a family pet may be involved.a troll of the highest order and one that is on the newsshoppers payroll.disgusting
I heard that the Mother tried to get the fox off the baby by dragging/kicking it, surely she must have received some injuries too...and so "inquiries continue"? Something doesn't seem to add up...! I expect they'll be carrying out DNA testing to find out if it was a fox or other canine relative?
Inspirationalady28
says...
5:11pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Gypo.Joe wrote:You carry on with your wild accusations but I'm not Lou and nobody has bought me off ok!!?
Looks like Louise ( Inspirationalady28 ) is the moderator now.
Is this how 'they' bought you off Lou ?
cheap cheap cheap.
Gypo.Joe
says...
5:18pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Inspirationalady28 wrote:Pants on fire !!
Gypo.Joe wrote:You carry on with your wild accusations but I'm not Lou and nobody has bought me off ok!!?
Looks like Louise ( Inspirationalady28 ) is the moderator now.
Is this how 'they' bought you off Lou ?
cheap cheap cheap.
Now excuse me I've had a few sherbets and I'm singing " swing lowwwwwwwwwwwwww sweet chariot"
Oldchap
says...
5:19pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Simon bald wrote:RIP !!!!!!
Shocking reporting all round may the baby RIP
Has something happened to the baby
Inspirationalady28
says...
5:21pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Gypo.Joe
says...
5:24pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Inspirationalady28 wrote:We agree at last. Yes the truth has a very nasty habit of 'outing' on the Shopper.
I really don't believe it was a fox who attacked that poor little baby, I really don't..and neither do a lot of the posters on here!! Someone is trying to cover up something, but the truth will come out..
Oldchap
says...
5:38pm Sun 10 Feb 13
the wall wrote:Actually a very good point, the fox had bitten off the finger and was trying to eat the rest of the baby when the mother wrestled / kicked / fought it off
Council tenant and her back door not fixed.....LOL
Something more to this I reckon.
How did they get the finger back?
Is this person fit to be a mother, if she can't even keep her back doors shut?
What will happen when the baby starts crawling / walking?
If it took that long then it was lucky that the doctors could sew it back on - must have been a really clean cut
And very lucky the fox didn't chew & swallow it
Simon bald
says...
6:05pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Inspirationalady28 wrote:So who are you calling a liar? Name a name who say is lying show us how big your balls are Louise and libel some poor sap just to make you feel better about your life
I really don't believe it was a fox who attacked that poor little baby, I really don't..and neither do a lot of the posters on here!! Someone is trying to cover up something, but the truth will come out..
Inspirationalady28
says...
6:30pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Simon bald wrote:Well it's obvious who's telling "porkies" but we haven't been issued with the names yet have we!!?
Inspirationalady28 wrote:So who are you calling a liar? Name a name who say is lying show us how big your balls are Louise and libel some poor sap just to make you feel better about your life
I really don't believe it was a fox who attacked that poor little baby, I really don't..and neither do a lot of the posters on here!! Someone is trying to cover up something, but the truth will come out..
banjo8
says...
8:03pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Who cares where it happened, it doesn't matter.
Fact is, foxes are dangerous vermin which need controlling. Hunting should never have been banned and foxes in towns should be poisoned or shot to keep there scabby numbers under control. But, the people who feed them are the ones really to blame.
Marty1979
says...
8:13pm Sun 10 Feb 13
banjo8 wrote:i'd like to see a pack of hounds & blokes on horses riding down Lewisham High Street!
Talk about missing the point.
Who cares where it happened, it doesn't matter.
Fact is, foxes are dangerous vermin which need controlling. Hunting should never have been banned and foxes in towns should be poisoned or shot to keep there scabby numbers under control. But, the people who feed them are the ones really to blame.
Marty1979
says...
9:29pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Inspirationalady28 wrote:I don't often, but on this one I agree with Louise
Simon bald wrote:Well it's obvious who's telling "porkies" but we haven't been issued with the names yet have we!!?
Inspirationalady28 wrote:So who are you calling a liar? Name a name who say is lying show us how big your balls are Louise and libel some poor sap just to make you feel better about your life
I really don't believe it was a fox who attacked that poor little baby, I really don't..and neither do a lot of the posters on here!! Someone is trying to cover up something, but the truth will come out..
I'm not saying who is telling fibs, but a lot of this story doesn't add up - so we haven't been given all the facts
banjo8
says...
9:34pm Sun 10 Feb 13
nearly right all the time
says...
10:00pm Sun 10 Feb 13
dogs in the last 20yrs
none atributed to foxes,!
people do not feed them, it the Cafes, Burger Joints , Kebab house that place their refuse in alleys and overfilled waste containers.
This "attack" took place in a private residence???
Take away their food they will disapear as if by magic
Trap them, then let them free 10 miles away they will only come back, or infest
another area, you must either cull them
or cut off their food supply,OR ITRODUCE WOLVES to keep the fox population down
banjo8
says...
10:44pm Sun 10 Feb 13
Gypo.Joe
says...
11:22pm Sun 10 Feb 13
banjo8 wrote:What are you, mutton dressed up as lamb ?
Of course people feed them, I know people who cook chicken breasts for them. I didn't say trap and release them, I said trap and kill them. You won't be able to stop people leaving junk food everywhere so you have to keep numbers down. I know it's not a wolf - what's got your goat. Or perhaps you're a lamb in lamb's clothing?
Inspirationalady28
says...
3:11am Mon 11 Feb 13
Marty1979 wrote:Thank you #Marty1979 but please, I'm not Louise as everyone seems to think...?
Inspirationalady28 wrote:I don't often, but on this one I agree with Louise
Simon bald wrote:Well it's obvious who's telling "porkies" but we haven't been issued with the names yet have we!!?
Inspirationalady28 wrote:So who are you calling a liar? Name a name who say is lying show us how big your balls are Louise and libel some poor sap just to make you feel better about your life
I really don't believe it was a fox who attacked that poor little baby, I really don't..and neither do a lot of the posters on here!! Someone is trying to cover up something, but the truth will come out..
I'm not saying who is telling fibs, but a lot of this story doesn't add up - so we haven't been given all the facts
Marty1979
says...
6:18am Mon 11 Feb 13
banjo8 wrote:If you've been watching TV various people have said culling (either by trapping or shooting) wouldn't work as more would move on and poison could kill domestic pets
Of course people feed them, I know people who cook chicken breasts for them. I didn't say trap and release them, I said trap and kill them. You won't be able to stop people leaving junk food everywhere so you have to keep numbers down. I know it's not a wolf - what's got your goat. Or perhaps you're a lamb in lamb's clothing?
The best way is to remove the food sources so they leave the area
Simon bald
says...
8:58am Mon 11 Feb 13
Inspirationalady28 wrote:the name of the mum is Hayley Cawley,dad's name is Paul Dolan. didn't get the name of the fox. are any of these the liars you speak of? or are you keeping your conspiracy theory to yourself now your bottle has gone
Simon bald wrote:Well it's obvious who's telling "porkies" but we haven't been issued with the names yet have we!!?
Inspirationalady28 wrote:So who are you calling a liar? Name a name who say is lying show us how big your balls are Louise and libel some poor sap just to make you feel better about your life
I really don't believe it was a fox who attacked that poor little baby, I really don't..and neither do a lot of the posters on here!! Someone is trying to cover up something, but the truth will come out..
banjo8
says...
9:00am Mon 11 Feb 13
pastymuncher008
says...
9:08am Mon 11 Feb 13
reasonable75
says...
10:09am Mon 11 Feb 13
Simon bald wrote:Each time theres a report the facts change, so either the newspapers & TV are reporting it wrong (something the parents need to complain about) or they are quoting different stories
Inspirationalady28 wrote:the name of the mum is Hayley Cawley,dad's name is Paul Dolan. didn't get the name of the fox. are any of these the liars you speak of? or are you keeping your conspiracy theory to yourself now your bottle has goneSimon bald wrote:Well it's obvious who's telling "porkies" but we haven't been issued with the names yet have we!!?Inspirationalady28 wrote: I really don't believe it was a fox who attacked that poor little baby, I really don't..and neither do a lot of the posters on here!! Someone is trying to cover up something, but the truth will come out..So who are you calling a liar? Name a name who say is lying show us how big your balls are Louise and libel some poor sap just to make you feel better about your life
She wrestled the fox / she kicked the fox
Door was open / door was broken (not in photos)
Finger was bitten off / arm down foxes throat - if finger was bitten off how did she get it out of the foxes throat?
Inspirationalady28
says...
10:19am Mon 11 Feb 13
the wall wrote:Well I read this which differs..; Khadine Peters, 36, who lives next door, said: "I wasn't there at the time, I was walking home down the street when I saw the ambulance outside the house.
Marty1979 says...And if neighbours heard screaming why did none go to help?
Properly thought her back doors were being sorted out.
From the Daily Fail:
Khadine Peters, 36, who lives next door to the house where the fox attack happened, said: 'I heard screams, but I didn't think anything of it.........
Sounds like screams often came from the house.
"I spoke to the mum and she told me a fox had attacked her baby.
“It was really bad, I'm so scared now - I definitely won't leave my back door open again.
Inspirationalady28
says...
10:28am Mon 11 Feb 13
Simon bald wrote:I've not lost any bottle and I'm not the only one who's thinking the same thing..but you have to agree something isn't quite straightforward in this that's why the Authorities are continuing with their investigations!
Inspirationalady28 wrote:the name of the mum is Hayley Cawley,dad's name is Paul Dolan. didn't get the name of the fox. are any of these the liars you speak of? or are you keeping your conspiracy theory to yourself now your bottle has gone
Simon bald wrote:Well it's obvious who's telling "porkies" but we haven't been issued with the names yet have we!!?
Inspirationalady28 wrote:So who are you calling a liar? Name a name who say is lying show us how big your balls are Louise and libel some poor sap just to make you feel better about your life
I really don't believe it was a fox who attacked that poor little baby, I really don't..and neither do a lot of the posters on here!! Someone is trying to cover up something, but the truth will come out..
Invicta58
says...
10:29am Mon 11 Feb 13
This farce has been running for nearly 2 years and will go on even longer if you get sidetracked onto foxes.
Please concentrate on the important work and stop chasing headlines.
the wall
says...
10:32am Mon 11 Feb 13
The threat to the urban child from domesticated dogs outweigh the threat from foxes massively. If every single dog atack on a child (or adult) was given this much coverage we'd need a bigger internet.
Who leaves door open long enough in February that a fox can wander and start to eat a child!?
A foxes usual MO is to go through bins, scraps of food as well as invertebrates and small mammals, amphibians, , grasses, berries, fruit, fish, birds, eggs, beetles, insects and all other kinds of small animals etc?
So surely it'd go through the kitchen looking for food rather than upstairs to attack a baby kicking and screaming?
There is definitely more to this story imo. Just doesn't ring true.
Gypo.Joe
says...
10:55am Mon 11 Feb 13
Cllr Colin Smith
says...
10:59am Mon 11 Feb 13
Invicta58 wrote:Thank you for your incredibly helpful advice on how to spend my weekends.
Cllr Smith, now that you've established this took place in Lewisham and not Bromley perhaps you could get back to fixing Orpington High Street. This farce has been running for nearly 2 years and will go on even longer if you get sidetracked onto foxes. Please concentrate on the important work and stop chasing headlines.
I'm sorry that you object to me helping to establish the truth to protect the Borough's reputation in my own spare time, I hope you don't mind too much but I must confess that I watched the Rugby as well.
If you care to post in your own name rather than snipping trollishly from the sidelines, I will arrange for answers to be sent to any further questions you may care to raise iro Orpington High Street
Gypo.Joe
says...
11:25am Mon 11 Feb 13
We could of sung a duet..." swing low sweet chariot " ;)
Anyway you should of been out gritting the streets you lazy b'tard.
Cllr Colin Smith
says...
1:22pm Mon 11 Feb 13
Gypo.Joe wrote:http://www.google.co
If I'd have known you were watching Colin I'd of had you round for a beer. We could of sung a duet..." swing low sweet chariot " ;) Anyway you should of been out gritting the streets you lazy b'tard.
.uk/imgres?imgurl=ht
tp://4.bp.blogspot.c
om/-etdBPt9716Y/UC3u
rNTJciI/AAAAAAAAAxE/
w2a2-JMk4l4/s1600/sm
iley-emoticon.png&im
grefurl=http://www.s
mileysymbols.com/&us
g=__3psVVkh5YzxBPejK
OQoh14xKIcs=&h=600&w
=600&sz=66&hl=en&sta
rt=2&zoom=1&tbnid=Ir
5TTTMupmXluM:&tbnh=1
35&tbnw=135&ei=QvAYU
ZmoEoOn0QWau4GAAQ&pr
ev=/images%3Fq%3Dsmi
ley%2Bsymbols%26hl%3
Den%26sa%3DX%26gbv%3
D2%26tbm%3Disch&itbs
=1&sa=X&ved=0CCwQrQM
wAQ
banjo8
says...
5:31pm Mon 11 Feb 13
Gypo.Joe
says...
6:48pm Mon 11 Feb 13
Shame we couldn't say the same fer you.
banjo8
says...
7:32pm Mon 11 Feb 13
mainman
says...
11:08pm Mon 11 Feb 13
banjo8 wrote:why is it the countryside alliance always revolves around killing animals and death
Talk about missing the point. Who cares where it happened, it doesn't matter. Fact is, foxes are dangerous vermin which need controlling. Hunting should never have been banned and foxes in towns should be poisoned or shot to keep there scabby numbers under control. But, the people who feed them are the ones really to blame.
banjo8
says...
8:43am Tue 12 Feb 13
Invicta58
says...
10:30am Tue 12 Feb 13
Cllr Colin Smith wrote:Touched a nerve there.
Invicta58 wrote:Thank you for your incredibly helpful advice on how to spend my weekends.
Cllr Smith, now that you've established this took place in Lewisham and not Bromley perhaps you could get back to fixing Orpington High Street. This farce has been running for nearly 2 years and will go on even longer if you get sidetracked onto foxes. Please concentrate on the important work and stop chasing headlines.
I'm sorry that you object to me helping to establish the truth to protect the Borough's reputation in my own spare time, I hope you don't mind too much but I must confess that I watched the Rugby as well.
If you care to post in your own name rather than snipping trollishly from the sidelines, I will arrange for answers to be sent to any further questions you may care to raise iro Orpington High Street
1) I wasn't telling you how to spend your weekend. I was pointing out your strange choice of priorities. You are telling us that making sure fox stories are attributed to the correct borough are more important than correcting the High Street you wrecked nearly two years ago?
2) Do you really think Bromley's reputation is enchanced by the mess you have made with Orpington High Street? Do you think it's a showcase for how well Bromley manage town systems?
3) Why do you need to know my name before you can answer? Wasn't it you who used to bleat on here about "play the ball not the man"?
I will be writing formally to Bromley Council and looking forward to see what excuses they can come up with to explain the appalling design that has doubled congestion, how they failed to manage it and allow such a poor quality finish, why they have now replaced part of it with tarmac, and when they will be repairing the other 95%.
Its a complete fiasco. I know it, you know it, News Shopper knows it, but hey - the fox was in Lewisham so everything's OK.
banjo8
says...
12:59pm Tue 12 Feb 13
TIGGY-LEWISHAM
says...
3:04pm Wed 13 Feb 13
come on, we're not stupid, it's not a fox, so clear from all these different stories, it's a cover up
banjo8
says...
7:23pm Wed 13 Feb 13
goldenbroomboy
says...
12:47pm Thu 14 Feb 13
Sorry, but I get the impression that they are now trying to milk this incident.
Oldchap
says...
3:06pm Thu 14 Feb 13
goldenbroomboy wrote:So the mother had sold her "exclusive" to The Sun
The couple concerned have been on the front page of The Scum, and today they are on the front page of The Wail's online edition.
Sorry, but I get the impression that they are now trying to milk this incident.
Wonder how much she got - hopefully she'll spend it on the baby
the wall
says...
3:14pm Thu 14 Feb 13

Chrisbitz says...
1:16am Sun 10 Feb 13