Bexleyheath and Crayford MP David Evennett 'disgraceful' for voting against same sex marriage

This Is Local London: David Evennett. David Evennett.

MP DAVID Evennett has been branded "disgraceful" after announcing he will vote against plans to legalise same sex marriage.

The Bexleyheath and Crayford MP confirmed he would not be backing David Cameron’s plans to allow gay marriage when the controversial vote reaches parliament next year.

More than 110 of the 303 Conservative MPs are thought to be planning to oppose the bill in what could be the biggest Tory rebellion of modern times.

Bexley Councillor Stefano Borella, who is openly gay, was among those who has slammed Mr Evennett’s decision.

The North End ward councillor told News Shopper: "I think it’s disgraceful - I don’t see why any MP should be voting against it.

"It’s going to give the wrong message as there are a large number of people in the community who want to see their elected politicians taking a lead on this.

"I’m disappointed he will vote against it but it’s a free vote so he is entitled to his view.

"I just feel we should be supporting it and that this is another step forward."

In a statement to News Shopper, Mr Evennett, who is a government whip, said: "I, personally, am a strong supporter of traditional marriage and will not be voting in favour of any changes."

It has been reported the Prime Minister is now planning to fast-track the bill through Parliament and the free-vote could come as early as January.

A free-vote prevents ministers from facing disciplinary action if they vote against David Cameron’s position.

Several Bexley church-goers travel to the gay-friendly Metropolitan Community Church in Camden, where Charlton resident Reverend Sharon Ferguson works.

The 54-year-old said: "I hope and pray David Evennett will reconsider how he is going to vote.

"If not, I think people - and not just the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community - will have to think again.

"If their MP is going to vote against an equality vote like this, what other equality issues is he likely to vote against?"

The Metro Centre is a voluntary organisation that meets weekly in Bexley for youngsters to discuss issues relating to their sexuality.

Communications director Patricia Durr said: "As a service provider to the young lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community in Bexley we’re saddened this is the message going out about equality.

"We know from the work we do that same sex marriage matters to the young people of Bexley."

Comments (56)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:50am Wed 28 Nov 12

ron.1952 says...

Evennett get with it please, Its not the 50s any more.

I have an idea for people like you Evennet, if you don't like gay marriage dont marry a gay guy/girl.

I don't fuss over who you want to marry so why would you be bothered who a gay person wants to marry.
Evennett get with it please, Its not the 50s any more. I have an idea for people like you Evennet, if you don't like gay marriage dont marry a gay guy/girl. I don't fuss over who you want to marry so why would you be bothered who a gay person wants to marry. ron.1952

10:54am Wed 28 Nov 12

ron.1952 says...

Ronny forgot to send you hugs David.

Ron xx
Ronny forgot to send you hugs David. Ron xx ron.1952

2:15pm Wed 28 Nov 12

Rev. Sue Scottley says...

As one of Mr. Evennett's contituents I am disappointed and somewhat cross. His voting should reflect what *we* want. Perhaps he should be asking more of his constituents what they want.
As one of Mr. Evennett's contituents I am disappointed and somewhat cross. His voting should reflect what *we* want. Perhaps he should be asking more of his constituents what they want. Rev. Sue Scottley

2:27pm Wed 28 Nov 12

PaulErith says...

I'll start by saying I'm all for same sex marriages as I believe it wrong to discriminate based on people's sexuality.

However, I don't really think it's fair to call him disgraceful. There's a vote on it, and hence he does have the right to vote the way he believes. When you vote in an MP, you're giving them a mandate to do just that. You're voting for that person because, broadly, they will share your beliefs. However, he can't keep every one of his constituents happy. You're probably not going to agree with everything that he does. If you don't like it, then vote him out at the next election.
I'll start by saying I'm all for same sex marriages as I believe it wrong to discriminate based on people's sexuality. However, I don't really think it's fair to call him disgraceful. There's a vote on it, and hence he does have the right to vote the way he believes. When you vote in an MP, you're giving them a mandate to do just that. You're voting for that person because, broadly, they will share your beliefs. However, he can't keep every one of his constituents happy. You're probably not going to agree with everything that he does. If you don't like it, then vote him out at the next election. PaulErith

3:37pm Wed 28 Nov 12

ksc says...

Is marriage not something special, not,if some people get their way, I know it's an old fashion view, but I like the idea of a man and woman getting married, political correctness dictates that you're not meant to discriminate, and if two men or two woman want to get married then so be it, which, I believe dilutes the whole sanctity of marriage thing.
Speaking hypothetically if it's OK for same sex marriages then who would have the right to speak up against a man or woman getting legally married to his or her dog, why would that be wrong, they would both love each other and would both want to spend the rest of their lives together, but I bet those for and against same sex marriage would be dead set against that.
But of course this is my personal view just like Mr Evennett's view and the views of people in the comments above, and as we all know, just because my view is different to your view, that doesn't make me a bad person, or automatically wrong.
Is marriage not something special, not,if some people get their way, I know it's an old fashion view, but I like the idea of a man and woman getting married, political correctness dictates that you're not meant to discriminate, and if two men or two woman want to get married then so be it, which, I believe dilutes the whole sanctity of marriage thing. Speaking hypothetically if it's OK for same sex marriages then who would have the right to speak up against a man or woman getting legally married to his or her dog, why would that be wrong, they would both love each other and would both want to spend the rest of their lives together, but I bet those for and against same sex marriage would be dead set against that. But of course this is my personal view just like Mr Evennett's view and the views of people in the comments above, and as we all know, just because my view is different to your view, that doesn't make me a bad person, or automatically wrong. ksc

5:03pm Wed 28 Nov 12

Tip-Top says...

You're right KSC, a paw print on a legal document is just as good as a lesbians signature.
You're right KSC, a paw print on a legal document is just as good as a lesbians signature. Tip-Top

5:52pm Wed 28 Nov 12

dizzy13 says...

This man wouldn't know what was right if it bit him on the bottom. I bet he would have voted for it if Cameron had told him. He is a poodle. I have heard he is retiring at the next election from someone who used to deliver leaflets for him, so maybe he doesn't care about us residents anymore??
This man wouldn't know what was right if it bit him on the bottom. I bet he would have voted for it if Cameron had told him. He is a poodle. I have heard he is retiring at the next election from someone who used to deliver leaflets for him, so maybe he doesn't care about us residents anymore?? dizzy13

6:50pm Wed 28 Nov 12

Gypo.Joe says...

ksc wrote:
Is marriage not something special, not,if some people get their way, I know it's an old fashion view, but I like the idea of a man and woman getting married, political correctness dictates that you're not meant to discriminate, and if two men or two woman want to get married then so be it, which, I believe dilutes the whole sanctity of marriage thing.
Speaking hypothetically if it's OK for same sex marriages then who would have the right to speak up against a man or woman getting legally married to his or her dog, why would that be wrong, they would both love each other and would both want to spend the rest of their lives together, but I bet those for and against same sex marriage would be dead set against that.
But of course this is my personal view just like Mr Evennett's view and the views of people in the comments above, and as we all know, just because my view is different to your view, that doesn't make me a bad person, or automatically wrong.
Old fashioned, in a word YES.

I'm all for equal rights, because that's what this issue is all about. If two men or women want to marry who cares, there's lots more important things to deal with.
[quote][p][bold]ksc[/bold] wrote: Is marriage not something special, not,if some people get their way, I know it's an old fashion view, but I like the idea of a man and woman getting married, political correctness dictates that you're not meant to discriminate, and if two men or two woman want to get married then so be it, which, I believe dilutes the whole sanctity of marriage thing. Speaking hypothetically if it's OK for same sex marriages then who would have the right to speak up against a man or woman getting legally married to his or her dog, why would that be wrong, they would both love each other and would both want to spend the rest of their lives together, but I bet those for and against same sex marriage would be dead set against that. But of course this is my personal view just like Mr Evennett's view and the views of people in the comments above, and as we all know, just because my view is different to your view, that doesn't make me a bad person, or automatically wrong.[/p][/quote]Old fashioned, in a word YES. I'm all for equal rights, because that's what this issue is all about. If two men or women want to marry who cares, there's lots more important things to deal with. Gypo.Joe

9:32pm Wed 28 Nov 12

ron.1952 says...

"I believe dilutes the whole sanctity of marriage thing."

Please explain how ksc ?

Ron
"I believe dilutes the whole sanctity of marriage thing." Please explain how ksc ? Ron ron.1952

9:45am Thu 29 Nov 12

goldenbroomboy says...

A "Gay" marriage cannot be consummated (I mean consummation, not penetration), so the concept is a pc farce.
A "Gay" marriage cannot be consummated (I mean consummation, not penetration), so the concept is a pc farce. goldenbroomboy

10:34am Thu 29 Nov 12

ron.1952 says...

goldenbroomboy wrote:
A "Gay" marriage cannot be consummated (I mean consummation, not penetration), so the concept is a pc farce.
How much you wanna bet me GBB.

I'll soon put you straight mate. No pun intended.

Ron.
[quote][p][bold]goldenbroomboy[/bold] wrote: A "Gay" marriage cannot be consummated (I mean consummation, not penetration), so the concept is a pc farce.[/p][/quote]How much you wanna bet me GBB. I'll soon put you straight mate. No pun intended. Ron. ron.1952

1:32pm Thu 29 Nov 12

goldenbroomboy says...

ron.1952 wrote:
goldenbroomboy wrote: A "Gay" marriage cannot be consummated (I mean consummation, not penetration), so the concept is a pc farce.
How much you wanna bet me GBB. I'll soon put you straight mate. No pun intended. Ron.
Ron, reproduction without a female is very difficult.
[quote][p][bold]ron.1952[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]goldenbroomboy[/bold] wrote: A "Gay" marriage cannot be consummated (I mean consummation, not penetration), so the concept is a pc farce.[/p][/quote]How much you wanna bet me GBB. I'll soon put you straight mate. No pun intended. Ron.[/p][/quote]Ron, reproduction without a female is very difficult. goldenbroomboy

4:03pm Thu 29 Nov 12

ron.1952 says...

Yes you are right GBB, but how about if straight couples stopped having gay children.

I agree withg Joe G, this is all about equal rights anyway.

Ron
Yes you are right GBB, but how about if straight couples stopped having gay children. I agree withg Joe G, this is all about equal rights anyway. Ron ron.1952

5:35pm Thu 29 Nov 12

MsChevious says...

ksc wrote:
Is marriage not something special, not,if some people get their way, I know it's an old fashion view, but I like the idea of a man and woman getting married, political correctness dictates that you're not meant to discriminate, and if two men or two woman want to get married then so be it, which, I believe dilutes the whole sanctity of marriage thing. Speaking hypothetically if it's OK for same sex marriages then who would have the right to speak up against a man or woman getting legally married to his or her dog, why would that be wrong, they would both love each other and would both want to spend the rest of their lives together, but I bet those for and against same sex marriage would be dead set against that. But of course this is my personal view just like Mr Evennett's view and the views of people in the comments above, and as we all know, just because my view is different to your view, that doesn't make me a bad person, or automatically wrong.
ksc, you really should change your username to WTF.

Comparing same-sex marriage to **** is ridiculous. You've lost straight away because you are clearly incapable of making a proper argument.

As another of Mr Evennett's constituants I'm appauled - all the opinion polls which only ask UK residents and only let each person 'vote' once (not those run by the Campaign for Marriage by the way...) show an overwhelming majority support equal marriage. His mandate is to represent the views of his constituants, not his own out-dated prejudices.
[quote][p][bold]ksc[/bold] wrote: Is marriage not something special, not,if some people get their way, I know it's an old fashion view, but I like the idea of a man and woman getting married, political correctness dictates that you're not meant to discriminate, and if two men or two woman want to get married then so be it, which, I believe dilutes the whole sanctity of marriage thing. Speaking hypothetically if it's OK for same sex marriages then who would have the right to speak up against a man or woman getting legally married to his or her dog, why would that be wrong, they would both love each other and would both want to spend the rest of their lives together, but I bet those for and against same sex marriage would be dead set against that. But of course this is my personal view just like Mr Evennett's view and the views of people in the comments above, and as we all know, just because my view is different to your view, that doesn't make me a bad person, or automatically wrong.[/p][/quote]ksc, you really should change your username to WTF. Comparing same-sex marriage to **** is ridiculous. You've lost straight away because you are clearly incapable of making a proper argument. As another of Mr Evennett's constituants I'm appauled - all the opinion polls which only ask UK residents and only let each person 'vote' once (not those run by the Campaign for Marriage by the way...) show an overwhelming majority support equal marriage. His mandate is to represent the views of his constituants, not his own out-dated prejudices. MsChevious

5:37pm Thu 29 Nov 12

MsChevious says...

Apparently one is not allowed to say

b e a s t i a l i t y

That told me!
Apparently one is not allowed to say b e a s t i a l i t y That told me! MsChevious

10:23pm Thu 29 Nov 12

planetx says...

Marriage is always has been always will be between a man and a woman, no matter what the law may say. A vote for so called gay marriage is a vote for a vile perversion.
Marriage is always has been always will be between a man and a woman, no matter what the law may say. A vote for so called gay marriage is a vote for a vile perversion. planetx

10:30pm Thu 29 Nov 12

ron.1952 says...

planetx wrote:
Marriage is always has been always will be between a man and a woman, no matter what the law may say. A vote for so called gay marriage is a vote for a vile perversion.
Run along back to planet x, that's where you belong.

Ron
[quote][p][bold]planetx[/bold] wrote: Marriage is always has been always will be between a man and a woman, no matter what the law may say. A vote for so called gay marriage is a vote for a vile perversion.[/p][/quote]Run along back to planet x, that's where you belong. Ron ron.1952

10:37pm Thu 29 Nov 12

Beckenham Chris says...

whatever next ? What about if a gay man wants to marry his horse will that be allowed ?
whatever next ? What about if a gay man wants to marry his horse will that be allowed ? Beckenham Chris

10:40pm Thu 29 Nov 12

Beckenham Chris says...

goldenbroomboy wrote:
A "Gay" marriage cannot be consummated (I mean consummation, not penetration), so the concept is a pc farce.
Have you not heard of Felching ? That just about does it ! (apparantly)
[quote][p][bold]goldenbroomboy[/bold] wrote: A "Gay" marriage cannot be consummated (I mean consummation, not penetration), so the concept is a pc farce.[/p][/quote]Have you not heard of Felching ? That just about does it ! (apparantly) Beckenham Chris

10:44pm Thu 29 Nov 12

Beckenham Chris says...

planetx wrote:
Marriage is always has been always will be between a man and a woman, no matter what the law may say. A vote for so called gay marriage is a vote for a vile perversion.
Crafty Butcher ?
[quote][p][bold]planetx[/bold] wrote: Marriage is always has been always will be between a man and a woman, no matter what the law may say. A vote for so called gay marriage is a vote for a vile perversion.[/p][/quote]Crafty Butcher ? Beckenham Chris

10:49pm Thu 29 Nov 12

ron.1952 says...

Beckenham Chris wrote:
whatever next ? What about if a gay man wants to marry his horse will that be allowed ?
Gee up ! Whoa back ! All the way to Brighton.

Ron x
[quote][p][bold]Beckenham Chris[/bold] wrote: whatever next ? What about if a gay man wants to marry his horse will that be allowed ?[/p][/quote]Gee up ! Whoa back ! All the way to Brighton. Ron x ron.1952

9:48am Fri 30 Nov 12

MsChevious says...

planetx wrote:
Marriage is always has been always will be between a man and a woman, no matter what the law may say. A vote for so called gay marriage is a vote for a vile perversion.
Except that's not true. Even in the Bible marriage was sometimes between one man and several women; one man and his female slaves (who weren't allowed to say no); or one man and a female child (as girls could be married off by their families then)

So, you see, the law has moved with the times and so should you!
[quote][p][bold]planetx[/bold] wrote: Marriage is always has been always will be between a man and a woman, no matter what the law may say. A vote for so called gay marriage is a vote for a vile perversion.[/p][/quote]Except that's not true. Even in the Bible marriage was sometimes between one man and several women; one man and his female slaves (who weren't allowed to say no); or one man and a female child (as girls could be married off by their families then) So, you see, the law has moved with the times and so should you! MsChevious

11:49am Fri 30 Nov 12

ron.1952 says...

How nice to see the homophobes posting and voting as much as they can.

Ron
How nice to see the homophobes posting and voting as much as they can. Ron ron.1952

6:38pm Fri 30 Nov 12

toomush2drink says...

So th christian values are no to gay marriage eh ? Sex offenders are ok though are they ?

http://news.bbc.co.u
k/1/hi/uk/407506.stm


That article was in 1999 so no doubt the defence will be things have changed since then in which case why cant two gay people get married too ?

Christianity equals hypocrites at their worst.

Planetx its time to move with the times.

Religion is big business lets not forget that.
The church of englands property portfolio was worth £1.6 billion in december 2010-
Total assets are running at over £4 billion.
No wonder they dont want a few gays ruining the gravy train.

Do they still do the collection thing every sunday ? I wonder why ?
So th christian values are no to gay marriage eh ? Sex offenders are ok though are they ? http://news.bbc.co.u k/1/hi/uk/407506.stm That article was in 1999 so no doubt the defence will be things have changed since then in which case why cant two gay people get married too ? Christianity equals hypocrites at their worst. Planetx its time to move with the times. Religion is big business lets not forget that. The church of englands property portfolio was worth £1.6 billion in december 2010- Total assets are running at over £4 billion. No wonder they dont want a few gays ruining the gravy train. Do they still do the collection thing every sunday ? I wonder why ? toomush2drink

6:41pm Fri 30 Nov 12

Lord Erastus Theobald Piggott says...

toomush2drink wrote:
So th christian values are no to gay marriage eh ? Sex offenders are ok though are they ?

http://news.bbc.co.u

k/1/hi/uk/407506.stm



That article was in 1999 so no doubt the defence will be things have changed since then in which case why cant two gay people get married too ?

Christianity equals hypocrites at their worst.

Planetx its time to move with the times.

Religion is big business lets not forget that.
The church of englands property portfolio was worth £1.6 billion in december 2010-
Total assets are running at over £4 billion.
No wonder they dont want a few gays ruining the gravy train.

Do they still do the collection thing every sunday ? I wonder why ?
One must not confuse Christianity with the politics of the Roman Catholic or Church of England ideology.
[quote][p][bold]toomush2drink[/bold] wrote: So th christian values are no to gay marriage eh ? Sex offenders are ok though are they ? http://news.bbc.co.u k/1/hi/uk/407506.stm That article was in 1999 so no doubt the defence will be things have changed since then in which case why cant two gay people get married too ? Christianity equals hypocrites at their worst. Planetx its time to move with the times. Religion is big business lets not forget that. The church of englands property portfolio was worth £1.6 billion in december 2010- Total assets are running at over £4 billion. No wonder they dont want a few gays ruining the gravy train. Do they still do the collection thing every sunday ? I wonder why ?[/p][/quote]One must not confuse Christianity with the politics of the Roman Catholic or Church of England ideology. Lord Erastus Theobald Piggott

10:43am Sat 1 Dec 12

jeff onions says...

i thought it was "adam and eve" in the bible and not "adam and steve" huh? well done to this mp you've just got yourself re-elected next time round!

just because a couple of bro-mancers like pigott and joe get all frisky in december with the thought of the pending xmas quiz and xmas goose stoo is not a reason for a sensinble rational mp to make the correct decision!!!!

jeff....single and available to - rite chicks under 40! yaaaaaaaaaaaaaar!!!!
!
i thought it was "adam and eve" in the bible and not "adam and steve" huh? well done to this mp you've just got yourself re-elected next time round! just because a couple of bro-mancers like pigott and joe get all frisky in december with the thought of the pending xmas quiz and xmas goose stoo is not a reason for a sensinble rational mp to make the correct decision!!!! jeff....single and available to - rite chicks under 40! yaaaaaaaaaaaaaar!!!! ! jeff onions

11:44pm Sat 1 Dec 12

planetx says...

Well done Mr Evennett doing what is right and not bowing to the lies of the true bigots who hate the truth thinking they are enlightened but are really in the dark ages just like the law if it is changed.
Well done Mr Evennett doing what is right and not bowing to the lies of the true bigots who hate the truth thinking they are enlightened but are really in the dark ages just like the law if it is changed. planetx

9:00am Sun 2 Dec 12

paulbexleyheath says...

i have met david evennett a couple time at various openings of things , were hes at his best standing there talking about stuff he dont have a clue about , eating and drinking the free food.
wake up man . get with it . times are changing . ****.
i have met david evennett a couple time at various openings of things , were hes at his best standing there talking about stuff he dont have a clue about , eating and drinking the free food. wake up man . get with it . times are changing . ****. paulbexleyheath

3:15pm Sun 2 Dec 12

Bob Downondiss says...

planetx when you come out of your closet you can tell us all about your imaginary friend in the sky. Now tell me I though this friend loved everyone no matter what. Or like all you religious freaks you choose the bits you like personally, the other bits you cast aside. What a good Christian you are.
planetx when you come out of your closet you can tell us all about your imaginary friend in the sky. Now tell me I though this friend loved everyone no matter what. Or like all you religious freaks you choose the bits you like personally, the other bits you cast aside. What a good Christian you are. Bob Downondiss

6:31am Mon 3 Dec 12

planetx says...

Bob Downondiss as I said the real bigots and phobics are people like you and you don't even know what religious means or you would'nt be showing your painful ignorance.the fact is so called 'gay marriage' is a perversion
Bob Downondiss as I said the real bigots and phobics are people like you and you don't even know what religious means or you would'nt be showing your painful ignorance.the fact is so called 'gay marriage' is a perversion planetx

10:25am Mon 3 Dec 12

Bob Downondiss says...

I assure you Planetx your imaginary friend knows that you are the bigot and ignorant. I'm sure he will foregive you though as your God loves all.
Now on your knees MF.
I assure you Planetx your imaginary friend knows that you are the bigot and ignorant. I'm sure he will foregive you though as your God loves all. Now on your knees MF. Bob Downondiss

11:27am Mon 3 Dec 12

ron.1952 says...

" And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my fingers upon thee ! ".......Jules.


Ronny.
" And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my fingers upon thee ! ".......Jules. Ronny. ron.1952

11:35am Mon 3 Dec 12

ron.1952 says...

planetx how about women clergy, same bigoted view on that matter too caveman/woman.

Is the earth still flat in your world ?

Ron
planetx how about women clergy, same bigoted view on that matter too caveman/woman. Is the earth still flat in your world ? Ron ron.1952

10:32pm Mon 3 Dec 12

Marty1979 says...

Yet all this equality only seems to work to the benefit of the gay community

There are specific gay pubs (whilst straight people aren't actually banned, it's clear they aren't welcome)

A firm I worked for actually had a "club" just for gay people

And a gay bloke who worked there said to a number of us "the thought of sex with a woman makes me physically sick" . Well obviously his father must have had sex with a woman....

Just imagine if a straight person had made a similar comment
Yet all this equality only seems to work to the benefit of the gay community There are specific gay pubs (whilst straight people aren't actually banned, it's clear they aren't welcome) A firm I worked for actually had a "club" just for gay people And a gay bloke who worked there said to a number of us "the thought of sex with a woman makes me physically sick" . Well obviously his father must have had sex with a woman.... Just imagine if a straight person had made a similar comment Marty1979

10:49am Tue 4 Dec 12

rarecockneyguvnor says...

“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.”

Charles Darwin.



Just about says it all, change, deal with it or die out homophobes.
“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change.” Charles Darwin. Just about says it all, change, deal with it or die out homophobes. rarecockneyguvnor

2:52pm Tue 4 Dec 12

planetx says...

Charles Darwin father of modern fairy tales pretending to be science
Charles Darwin father of modern fairy tales pretending to be science planetx

3:19pm Tue 4 Dec 12

rarecockneyguvnor says...

Oh great so you deny evolution too planetx. How quaint of you.

Now think about this, you really believe we are all decended from Adam and Eve right. So Adam and Eve have a few children, so those children must have had incestous relations with either each other or their parents. Am I Right ? So in denying evolution you believe incest occourred. Well I never, what strange going on in your world.
Perhaps you can go ask that friend in the sky for your answer.
Oh great so you deny evolution too planetx. How quaint of you. Now think about this, you really believe we are all decended from Adam and Eve right. So Adam and Eve have a few children, so those children must have had incestous relations with either each other or their parents. Am I Right ? So in denying evolution you believe incest occourred. Well I never, what strange going on in your world. Perhaps you can go ask that friend in the sky for your answer. rarecockneyguvnor

3:38pm Tue 4 Dec 12

planetx says...

have not got a friend in the sky don't know where you get the idea from you really are obsessed
have not got a friend in the sky don't know where you get the idea from you really are obsessed planetx

3:49pm Tue 4 Dec 12

Lord Erastus Theobald Piggott says...

David Evernotreadyforchang
e.

Get wise, son.
David Evernotreadyforchang e. Get wise, son. Lord Erastus Theobald Piggott

7:46pm Tue 4 Dec 12

rarecockneyguvnor says...

planetx wrote:
have not got a friend in the sky don't know where you get the idea from you really are obsessed
Obsessed well I'm surprised you could spell the word.
Now answer me please about the incest regarding Adam and Eve and their childrens on going procreation ?


PS capital letters and full stops would help your posts. Have you thought about Sunday skool.
[quote][p][bold]planetx[/bold] wrote: have not got a friend in the sky don't know where you get the idea from you really are obsessed[/p][/quote]Obsessed well I'm surprised you could spell the word. Now answer me please about the incest regarding Adam and Eve and their childrens on going procreation ? PS capital letters and full stops would help your posts. Have you thought about Sunday skool. rarecockneyguvnor

11:38pm Tue 4 Dec 12

planetx says...

you still didn't answer my question
you still didn't answer my question planetx

11:38pm Tue 4 Dec 12

planetx says...

you still didn't answer my question
you still didn't answer my question planetx

12:03am Wed 5 Dec 12

rarecockneyguvnor says...

planetx wrote:
you still didn't answer my question
Steady now you're gettting an itchy trigger finger posting twice.

I await your answer about Adam and Eve and their childrens incest.

Come along now don't be shy, what does your good book tell you about it pray tell. Or perhaps 'him' upstairs will tell you if you ask nice.
[quote][p][bold]planetx[/bold] wrote: you still didn't answer my question[/p][/quote]Steady now you're gettting an itchy trigger finger posting twice. I await your answer about Adam and Eve and their childrens incest. Come along now don't be shy, what does your good book tell you about it pray tell. Or perhaps 'him' upstairs will tell you if you ask nice. rarecockneyguvnor

12:10am Wed 5 Dec 12

andygino says...

He's absolutely right opposing gay marriage.
There are civil partnerships are available for gay couples as a non religious ceremony.
Marriage in a church is should reflect the Christian message of a life long commitment between a man and women with the hope of procreation.
As far as I know, there’s no evidence from any biblical scholar within the last two thousand years than condones the marriage of two men or women within the gospels.
The Church is not supposed to be 'in this world' and follow the latest rantings of Stonewall and mischief making atheists, but continue the timeless message of Christ's teachings down the generations to be swayed by any social metropolitan fashion of the day.
He's absolutely right opposing gay marriage. There are civil partnerships are available for gay couples as a non religious ceremony. Marriage in a church is should reflect the Christian message of a life long commitment between a man and women with the hope of procreation. As far as I know, there’s no evidence from any biblical scholar within the last two thousand years than condones the marriage of two men or women within the gospels. The Church is not supposed to be 'in this world' and follow the latest rantings of Stonewall and mischief making atheists, but continue the timeless message of Christ's teachings down the generations to be swayed by any social metropolitan fashion of the day. andygino

1:04am Wed 5 Dec 12

rarecockneyguvnor says...

You religious nuts need to worry more about sorting your own house out before you pontificate about same sex marriage. Your churches are full of b um thudders and child molesters. What's even worse is the fact that its all been covered up for years by those that preach the good word at the highest level.
Lots of people starving around the world and the church is one of most countries largest land owners, lets not even go there about the Pope mincing around around in robes fit for any monarch and red Prada shoes. Ohh the hypocrisy of the church.
You religious nuts need to worry more about sorting your own house out before you pontificate about same sex marriage. Your churches are full of b um thudders and child molesters. What's even worse is the fact that its all been covered up for years by those that preach the good word at the highest level. Lots of people starving around the world and the church is one of most countries largest land owners, lets not even go there about the Pope mincing around around in robes fit for any monarch and red Prada shoes. Ohh the hypocrisy of the church. rarecockneyguvnor

1:01pm Wed 5 Dec 12

gemmy says...

andygino wrote:
He's absolutely right opposing gay marriage.
There are civil partnerships are available for gay couples as a non religious ceremony.
Marriage in a church is should reflect the Christian message of a life long commitment between a man and women with the hope of procreation.
As far as I know, there’s no evidence from any biblical scholar within the last two thousand years than condones the marriage of two men or women within the gospels.
The Church is not supposed to be 'in this world' and follow the latest rantings of Stonewall and mischief making atheists, but continue the timeless message of Christ's teachings down the generations to be swayed by any social metropolitan fashion of the day.
A Civil partnership is different from a marriage, even if the ceremony is a non-religious ceremony, if it was the same as a 'marriage' it would be an option for a hetrosexual couple. I know this from experience as I share a house with a man that I am not romantically linked, we wanted to protect our joint assets but were told we would have to marry as Civil Partnership is not a legal option for us.
[quote][p][bold]andygino[/bold] wrote: He's absolutely right opposing gay marriage. There are civil partnerships are available for gay couples as a non religious ceremony. Marriage in a church is should reflect the Christian message of a life long commitment between a man and women with the hope of procreation. As far as I know, there’s no evidence from any biblical scholar within the last two thousand years than condones the marriage of two men or women within the gospels. The Church is not supposed to be 'in this world' and follow the latest rantings of Stonewall and mischief making atheists, but continue the timeless message of Christ's teachings down the generations to be swayed by any social metropolitan fashion of the day.[/p][/quote]A Civil partnership is different from a marriage, even if the ceremony is a non-religious ceremony, if it was the same as a 'marriage' it would be an option for a hetrosexual couple. I know this from experience as I share a house with a man that I am not romantically linked, we wanted to protect our joint assets but were told we would have to marry as Civil Partnership is not a legal option for us. gemmy

9:38pm Wed 5 Dec 12

dizzy13 says...

Evennet is in the letter's section this week trying to grasp some dignity back -tough! You don't speak for us, you are a sham. If Cameron had told you to vote for it and it was whipped, you would have done. Hardly a man of moral's. Hardly a man to represent all.
Evennet is in the letter's section this week trying to grasp some dignity back -tough! You don't speak for us, you are a sham. If Cameron had told you to vote for it and it was whipped, you would have done. Hardly a man of moral's. Hardly a man to represent all. dizzy13

10:55pm Wed 5 Dec 12

planetx says...

I don't know what you are talking about when you say him upstairs,or imaginary friend.You are the one who keeps talking about it. I have not even said anything like that so you are obsessed by it. Who said I believe incest happened? But one thing is certain children cannot be born from a so called 'gay' relationship.
I don't know what you are talking about when you say him upstairs,or imaginary friend.You are the one who keeps talking about it. I have not even said anything like that so you are obsessed by it. Who said I believe incest happened? But one thing is certain children cannot be born from a so called 'gay' relationship. planetx

11:06am Thu 6 Dec 12

rarecockneyguvnor says...

Planetx you are denying evolution so please explain to me how we all decended from two humans. ( Adam and Eve )


I'll try to explain about your imaginary friend........sit down now this may be a shock.......ready ..........its your so called God. The figment of your imagination.
Planetx you are denying evolution so please explain to me how we all decended from two humans. ( Adam and Eve ) I'll try to explain about your imaginary friend........sit down now this may be a shock.......ready ..........its your so called God. The figment of your imagination. rarecockneyguvnor

10:26pm Sun 9 Dec 12

Beckenham Chris says...

who would want their but looking like a donkey yawning ?
who would want their but looking like a donkey yawning ? Beckenham Chris

1:37pm Mon 10 Dec 12

Beckenham Chris says...

And Jesus said unto the crowd of mincing hairdressers "and lo blessed are the shirtlifters,pillow biters and uphill gardeners"

and " let any man who is not a crafty buthcher stand now before me with his piece in his hand Amen"
And Jesus said unto the crowd of mincing hairdressers "and lo blessed are the shirtlifters,pillow biters and uphill gardeners" and " let any man who is not a crafty buthcher stand now before me with his piece in his hand Amen" Beckenham Chris

4:04pm Mon 10 Dec 12

Gypo.Joe says...

Beckenham Chris are you a closet turd burglar by chance ?

thAnK yoU
Beckenham Chris are you a closet turd burglar by chance ? thAnK yoU Gypo.Joe

5:32pm Mon 10 Dec 12

Beckenham Chris says...

Gypo.Joe wrote:
Beckenham Chris are you a closet turd burglar by chance ?

thAnK yoU
Gypo - No I am not although I see that many on here are drivers on the Marmite Motoway on their way to drop Anchor at Poo Bay.
[quote][p][bold]Gypo.Joe[/bold] wrote: Beckenham Chris are you a closet turd burglar by chance ? thAnK yoU[/p][/quote]Gypo - No I am not although I see that many on here are drivers on the Marmite Motoway on their way to drop Anchor at Poo Bay. Beckenham Chris

10:59am Thu 13 Dec 12

Gypo.Joe says...

Well I'm a lesbian myself, in a mans body. I'm rather partial to a bit of carpet munching. Num Num Num Num, a black belt in bean flicking.
Well I'm a lesbian myself, in a mans body. I'm rather partial to a bit of carpet munching. Num Num Num Num, a black belt in bean flicking. Gypo.Joe

11:06am Thu 13 Dec 12

Tip-Top says...

Gypo - You are what you eat ;o)
Gypo - You are what you eat ;o) Tip-Top

11:59am Thu 13 Dec 12

Gypo.Joe says...

I big old clitoris burger, wiv fish sauce.

Luvley jubbly.
I big old clitoris burger, wiv fish sauce. Luvley jubbly. Gypo.Joe

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree