Local London Logo
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Today's most viewed
EDITOR'S CHOICE
TOP STORIES
BNP member: 'I'm here to stay'
HARROW: Second round of blast talks
FEATURES
Young negotiators to work with gangs
Olympic dreams for judo centre
MAYOR NEWS
Boris talks with NY counterpart
BIZARRE LONDON
TRAVEL
Archbishop backs Heathrow demo
COMPETITIONS
A sweet deal with Caramel and Hotel Chocolat
VOTE
Do you think Boris Johnson's public transport alcohol ban is a good move?
Yes
No
Not sure
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
Fingerprint row at Heathrow's Terminal 5

The Information Commissioner is to investigate plans to fingerprint passengers at Heathrow's new Terminal 5.

Under the plans passengers' prints would be checked at the gate to ensure the person who checked in is the same person who boards the plane.

But airport operator BAA has been warned the security measures may be a breach of the Data Protection Act.

Spanish owned BAA says the data is encrypted immediately and then destroyed within 24 hours in line with the act.

Other airports with common departure lounge check passengers' identities using photographs rather than fingerprinting.

The Information Commissioner's Office began its investigation after a complaint by Privacy International - a civil liberties group.

The complaint states: "We believe the BAA solution is disproportionately intrusive. Even if it were to be established that passenger switching (if indeed such a problem exists) was a terrorist threat (rather than merely a breach of airline terms and conditions on transferability) then the photo option would be less invasive and would involve fewer intrusive procedures and less personal data."

Deputy Information Comissioner David Smith told the Mail on Sunday: "We want to know why Heathrow needs to fingerprint passengers at all.

"Taking photographs is less intrusive. So far we have not head BAA's case for requesting fingerpints."

He warned if the act had been breached he would try and persuade BAA to put things right - and if that was not successful they could be prosecuted.

In a statement, BAA said: "When BAA announced plans for common departure lounges, the Border and Immigration Agency (BIA) was keen on a reliable biometric element to border control.

"Fingerprinting was selected as the most robust method by BAA, the BIA and other Government departments.

"The data is encrypted immediately and is destroyed within 24 hours of use, in accordance with the Data Protection Act.

"It does not include personal details nor is it cross-referenced with any other database."

The Home Office which runs the BIA has denied telling Heathrow to fingerprint passengers.

Terminal 5, which cost £4.3billion to build, is due to open to passengers on Thursday.

The opening is not excepted to be delayed by the Information Commissioner's investigation.

7:28am Monday 24th March 2008

Print   Email this   Comment
Posted by: factoid, hayes on 1:39pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Oh no, if they bring fingerprinting in it will make life more difficult for illegal immigrants and terrorists - We can't have that can we?

Privacy international - Terrorist sympathy more like!

lets look after the civil liberties of honest taxpayers and not criminals for a change.

It's funny when our so called Authorities panda to an extremely small but vocal bunch
of P.C. loons!
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login
Archive
Local Search
Powered by Powered by Fish4
Use our news
Feed Local London headlines live to your site with RSS - free!
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network