Lisa wrote:
Croyboy, did you miss the most vital point, that the \'uncle\' is white! Obvious paedophile, find him and then hang him thats what they need to do!

hindi wrote:
croyboy? or should i call u cryboy u need 2 stop moaning and get a life ! u talk crap !just another redneck who cant take the fact that u people are second rate no class whiteboys in ur own country !just shut up keep hurtin !lol

Croyboy you are constantly telling us all what a multicultural hell hole we live in.

I remember you stating recently that the nazis had a lot of good ideas, you failed to give any examples of these "good ideas" though??

And your comments in response to the tragic story about the terrified young Mauritius girl and the death of her baby, are truly disgusting.

Firstly, I'm flattered that you should recall my humble contributions. Secondly, I should be pleased to rectify my failure: the Nazi Party was probably the first ecologically-aware political group in Europe; it promoted motorways (until recently considered a Good Thing!), personal transport for the masses (the Volkswagen),
and health and fitness for ordinary citizens, especially young people (Think of our ever-increasing obesity problem. And before you say "Oh, yes: the Hitler Youth!", this was based on the ideas of our very own Baden Powell.
Enough for you?

If you were to pause and think for a second, rather than to trip over yourself in your eagerness to display your moral superiority, you could possibly have concluded that said "young Mauritius girl" dumping her baby was ever more reprehensible than my comments.

I have no idea whether your claims regarding the virtues of the Nazi`s are correct or not.

I do know for certain that the German Nazi government were responsible for the systematic slaughter of millions of innocent people.

I think when an organisation or person is responsible for depraved evil atrocities against mankind , no normal person champions their good points.

...regardless of your views on the mother`s actions, for you to state that you think the death of a baby is a good thing, because it will save the taxpayer money , IMO is a truly sick thing to say..

Really! ...So modest. I thought you saw yourself as an authority on this and many other subjects!

Yes, while the communist governments of the Soviet Union and China killed an even greater number of " innocent people". And whereas this all happened before I - and I suspect you - were born - the communist government of Cambodia was killing people far more recently, and communist government of North Korea continues to do so today, so why your pre-occupation with ancient history?
Oh, yes, and in your wisdom (?), am I permitted to "champion" the "good points" of oppressive communist regimes such as those in Vietnam, Cuba, and China (until recently), which have made considerable improvements in health care? ...Or is it only the Nazis that are a no-no?

You can't know for sure what I "think", but I have made it clear that it would appear to be not altogether to the UK taxpayers' disadvantage that events took the turn they did. But the main point is, it's not our responsibility, and we cannot supply welfare facilities to the whole world... although our "betters" at Westminster don't seem to have realised this yet.

Croygirl wrote:
Croyboy, were you dropped on your head as a child?

LOL croyboy, do the words pot, kettle and black mean anything to you?

I remember you stating recently that the nazis had a lot of good ideas, you failed to give any examples of these "good ideas" though??

I have no interest in debating the good/bad points of different past or present regimes.

The reason i made mention of the Nazis, was to highlight the fact that you, like most other far right racist extremists seem to feel some kind of affinity with Facsism and Hitler`s Nazis.

For once I must find myself agreeing with a lot of what Croyboy has said, regarding past issues such as the Nazi party and Mao's China, both offering up some excellent ideas, especially Mao's China, just a sham about the genocide.
But that doesnt mean I agree with everything stated. I personally believe the influx of immigrants is purely the next step of evolution in a country with more miggrant heritage than any other. In fact we can hardly claim to be british. Everyone within this country is a product of immigration, wheter it be recent from places like India and Pakistan or over 2000 years ago from Germanic europe. The truth of Britain is that we are a nation built upon immigartion and multiculturalism, something that has worked to our advantage in the past. Todays Britain purely seems to be history repeating, however in a more socially violent and implosive way than ever.
Anyway, doesn't bother me, soon as I finnish uni im off to Canada.

...a country with more miggrant heritage than any other. In fact we can hardly claim to be british.

You claim I am guilty of playground insults...

And you state I havent the faintest idea of what you stand for.

Firstly you advocate the removal from this country of millions of hardworking, taxpaying, law abiding citizens because they were not born in this country...

You claim you would like to see a "democratic" referendum concerning this issue ,when asked whether you believed all british citizens should be allowed to partake in this "democratic" procedure, you answered "not if I could help it, would you allow turkeys to vote for christmas?" I take it in this anology, the turkeys are meant to represent british citizens not born in this country and their descendants , and is Christmas meant to be the removal of said people??
Nice and democratic then, nearly as democratic as... well...Nazi germany.(lol)

So you see, judging from these views, I dont think many reasonable people would think me guilty of springing to conclusions or making wild accusations, when I claim your views are Racist, Far Right and Extremist.

That's right. Although I've always openly said I think it would be in the UK's interest to stop the importation of people, and then to start repatriating the majority of the aliens already here, that doesn't mean you know what I think on any other subjects, something you frequently affect to have knowledge of (That's the "wild accusations" bit.). ...And anyway, why should it matter to you?

I advocate their removal, yes, but tell me Yogi, how on earth do you know they're all
"hardworking, taxpaying, law abiding citizens"? You are again affecting to possess knowledge you don't in fact have.

It would be a thoroughly democratic procedure, as the "demos" - the people - would decide, rather than an unrepresentative clique of professional nest-fetherers and jobsworths in the Westminster talking-shop.

1/ Who's a "reasonable" person in this case? ...Someone who agrees with you?

2/ My views on immigration are clear enough, but maybe you're extrapolating too much from them.

3/ When have I ever mentioned "race"? ...As opposed to yourself!

4/ Why do you feel the need to keep finding a label to hang around the necks of others?

5/ Have you ever considered I might be a Green? ...You know, smaller population equals more sustainability?

6/ And to rephrase a previous question: why should my personal qualities be so important to you anyway?

As for the matters of the Mauritian mother who left her baby to die, and the doctor who conned her desperately sick patients, I've already answered your questions elsewhere - and can't help but notice you seem to be preoccupied with my opinions on these reports rather than having any sort of empathy with the actual victims of the crimes.
I wonder why.

Well from other recent DNA studies as well Croyboy, we have seen significant examples of DNA dating back to early Mediterranean tribes.

there is DNA from all over europe in Britain...

their are few people in this country with truly British DNA

thats the last time I defend anything you have to say.

I'd be delighted to challenge it...firstly by asking what "fact" you're talking about! How many, or what proportion, are "hardworking"? After all, a good many of the welfare-dependent inhabitants of the sink estates around Croydon are immigrants/of immigrant descent. Thus "taxpaying"? ...Hardly. "law abiding"? ...Not if drug-dealing and mugging have yet to be decriminalised; and what about the "law abiding British citizens" who blew themselves up on the tube, and those other "law abiding British citizens" who go abroad - or perhaps stay here - to pursue jihad? However, all this is in a way irrelevant, as even if "every single non british born citizen and descendant of," was "hardworking law abiding and taxpaying", my contention is that we don't need them here.

Yogi wrote: You have previously advocated not allowing non british born or their british born descendants the allowance to vote in this "democratic" referendum. Afterall as you put it "would you allow turkey`s a vote on Xmas"
If this is still your stance...
Yes, it is: Croyboy is nothing if not consistent!

Why "your admired Nazi Germany"? You also said earlier "I am just highlighting the fact that you are a Nazi sympathizer..." How do you know any of this? ...And this from an individual who said "I have no interest in debating the good/bad points of different past or present regimes" - which suggests a limited knowledge of same. ...And, again, why are you apparently afraid to stick to the issues?

It really doesn't matter to me what you or, for that matter, anyone else might think about me personally, so it's rather a tiresome waste of time trotting out the same old shrieks of "Racist" and "Nazi" in practically every post.

As regards label-hanging, you said: I am just expressing my opinions, if in doing so I am guilty of "labelling" others then so be it. As long as I give reasoning for any such labelling ,I dont see that this should be a problem, should it? I seem to remember you "labelling" others as "liberal`s" on more than one occasion.... Oh dear that pot is not rearing it`s ugly head again, is it?
Of course it's only an opinion, albeit one repetitively expressed. Maybe that's the point. Yes, I'm sure I must have mentioned the word "liberal" in passing, but
ad nauseam? ...As an incantation that was somehow supposed to prove I was on the side of the angels? ....No, Yogi, I think not.

And about my being Green, you were led to rule out this possibility, considering that the "green`s" are widely viewed as being....well...pret


ty liberal!
Oh, dear! ...In my experience dedicated greens are about the most illiberal people you could wish to meet.