Local London Logo
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
Today's most viewed
EDITOR'S CHOICE
TOP STORIES
LEYTON: Father and son appear in court over street attack
LEWISHAM: French students murder suspect treated for burns
Mayor scraps £25 road charge hike
FEATURES
Police show ‘zero tolerance’ in drink driver crackdown
Helping in many different ways
MAYOR NEWS
Enquiry urged into Ray Lewis allegations
TRAVEL
'Dirty' car charge increase scrapped
COMPETITIONS
UGLIEST PET COMPETITION
VOTE
The Queen and royal family cost the equivalent of 66p per person in the UK last year. This is less than two pints of milk or a music download - but do we get value for money from our royals?
Yes
No
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
Parliament protestor wins round 11
The case was the 11th to be brought against Brian Haw. (Pic: Martina Smit)
The case was the 11th to be brought against Brian Haw. (Pic: Martina Smit)

APPLAUSE broke out in court as peace campaigner Brian Haw won his latest legal battle to maintain his five-year protest outside parliament.

This time, police had claimed they feared terrorists could plant bombs among his placards.

On 23 May last year, 78 officers swooped on Mr Haw in a dawn raid that cost £27,000. They arrested him, along with three of his supporters, and seized most of the banners in his 40-metre display on Parliament Square.

The 57-year-old campaigner, from Redditch in Worcestershire, was charged with breaching the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (Socpa) - which was adapted specifically to end Mr Haw's vigil.

The case was the 11th to be brought against the 57-year-old father of seven children since he started his vigil in 2001.

But today District Judge Quentin Purdy ruled Mr Haw did not violate rules imposed on him by police under the Act.

The Met police had ordered him to keep his placards within a space of 3 metres high, 3 metres wide and 1 metre deep.

In court it was claimed that he had failed to supervise the site with "diligence and care" to keep anyone from planting an explosive device there.

However, the judge found the police conditions were invalid because they were unclear.

Also, the eventual raid was ordered by an officer of lower rank than the Met's commissioner.

"The commissioner cannot delegate his powers under Socpa as he purported to do," Judge Purdey said at the City of Westminster magistrates' court.

"Additionally I find the conditions drafted as they are lack clarity and are not workable in their current form."

He added: "Therefore I uphold the submission of no case to answer and dismiss this summons."

3:37pm Monday 22nd January 2007

Print   Email this   Comment
Posted by: Simon Baddeley on 11:30am Tue 30 Jan 07
A KNIGHT ther was, and that a worthy man, That fro the tyme that he first bigan To riden out, he loved chivalrie, Trouthe and honour, fredom and curteisie.
Ful worthy was he in his lordes werre, And therto hadde he riden, no man ferre, As wel in cristendom as in hethenesse,
And evere honoured for his worthynesse.
Add your comment
Name:
Email: *
Location:
**
Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
 
 e.g. 123-123
Comment:
Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
Format Text:

 
By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
* Your email address will not be displayed
** To avoid register now or login
Archive
Local Search
Powered by Powered by Fish4
Use our news
Feed Local London headlines live to your site with RSS - free!
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
Newsquest Media Group
A Gannett Company
This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network